Enhanced dendritic cell antigen capture via Toll-like receptor-induced actin remodeling

Science

Volumn 305, Issue 5687, 2004, Pages 1153-1157

  West, Michale A ^a   Wallin, Robert P A ^a,b,c   Matthews, Stephen P ^a   Svensson, Henrik G ^a   Zaru, Rossana ^a   Ljunggren, Hans Gustaf ^c   Prescott, Alan R ^a   Watts, Colin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIGENS; CELLS; ENZYME INHIBITION; ENZYMES;

CYTOSKELETONS; DENDRITIC CELLS;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;

ACTIN; LIGAND; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN CLASS 1; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN CLASS 2; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE; SYNAPTOPHYSIN; TOLL LIKE RECEPTOR;

CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTIGEN EXPRESSION; ANTIGEN PRESENTATION; ARTICLE; CELL MATURATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOSKELETON; DENDRITIC CELL; ENDOCYTOSIS; IMMUNOSTIMULATION; LIGAND BINDING; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PINOCYTOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INDUCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; T LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION;

ACTINS; ANIMALS; ANTIGEN PRESENTATION; ANTIGENS; CELL MEMBRANE; CELLS, CULTURED; CYTOSKELETON; DENDRITIC CELLS; DOWN-REGULATION; ENDOCYTOSIS; LIGANDS; LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDES; MEMBRANE GLYCOPROTEINS; MICE; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; MICROSCOPY, VIDEO; MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASES; PINOCYTOSIS; RECEPTORS, CELL SURFACE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TOLL-LIKE RECEPTORS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 4143086928     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1099153     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. C. A. Janeway Jr., R. Medzhitov, Annu. Rev. Immunol. 20, 197 (2002).
2. P. Matzinger, Science 296, 301 (2002).
3. A. Lanzavecchia, F. Sallusto, Cell 106, 263 (2001).
4. I. Mellman, R. M. Steinman, Cell 106, 255 (2001).
5. P. Guermonprez, I. Valladeau, L. Zitvogel, C. Thery, S. Amigorena, Annu. Rev. Immunol. 20, 621 (2002).
6. F. Granucci, C. Vizzardelli, E. Virzi, M. Rescigno, P. Ricciardi-Castagnoli, Eur. J. Immunol. 31, 2539 (2001).
7. Q. Huang et al., Science 294, 870 (2001).
8. M. Kleijmeer et al., J. Cell Biol. 155, 53 (2001).
9. M. Boes et al., J. Immunol. 171, 4081 (2003).
10. A. Chow, D. Toomre, W. Garrett, I. Mellman, Nature 418, 988 (2002).
11. E. S. Trombetta, M. Ebersold, W. Garrett, M. Pypaert, I. Mellman, Science 299, 1400 (2003).
12. J. M. Blander, R. Medzhitov, Science 304, 1014 (2004).
13. H. Lelouard et al., Nature 417, 177 (2002).
14. M. Cella, A. Engering, V. Pinet, J. Pieters, A. Lanzavecchia, Nature 388, 782 (1997).
15. L. Delamarre, H. Holcombe, I. Mellman, J. Exp. Med. 198, 111 (2003).
16. F. Sallusto, M. Cella, C. Danieli, A. Lanzavecchia, J. Exp. Med. 182, 389 (1995).
17. M. A. West, A. R. Prescott, E. L. Eskelinen, A. J. Ridley, C. Watts, Curr. Biol. 10, 839 (2000).
18. W. S. Garrett et al., Cell 102, 325 (2000).
19. Materials and Methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
20. M. A. West et al., data not shown.
21. S. Akira, J. Biol. Chem. 278, 38105 (2003).
22. A. Regnault et al., J. Exp. Med. 189, 371 (1999).
23. J. G. Evans, I. Correia, O. Krasavina, N. Watson, P. Matsudaira, J. Cell Biol. 161, 697 (2003).
24. S. Linder, M. Aepfelbacher, Trends Cell Biol. 13, 376 (2003).
25. O. Destaing, F. Saltel, J. C. Geminard, P. Jurdic, F. Bard, Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 407 (2003).
26. M. A. West et al., Eur. J. Immunol. 29, 3450 (1999).
27. S. Burns, A. J. Thrasher, M. P. Blundell, L. Machesky, G. E. Jones, Blood 98, 1142 (2001).
28. S. Burns et al., Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 57, 118 (2004).
29. G. C. Ochoa et al., J. Cell Biol. 150, 377 (2000).
30. Only cells that have completely lost podosomes are scored as affected, which may underestimate the TLR signaling effect. CpG effects on endocytosis and podosome stability were generally less robust, probably because of lower and more variable expression of TLR9 in myeloid DCs.
31. N. Araki, M. T. Johnson, J. A. Swanson, J. Cell Biol. 135, 1249 (1996).
32. R. M. Steinman, D. Hawiger, M. C. Nussenzweig, Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21, 685 (2003).
33. J. Han, J. D. Lee, L. Bibbs, R. J. Ulevitch, Science 265, 808 (1994).
34. Single-Letter abbreviations for the amino acid residues are as follows: A, Ala; C, Cys; D, Asp; E, Glu; F, Phe; G, Gly; H, His; I, Ile; K, Lys; L, Leu; M, Met; N, Asn; P, Pro; Q, Gln; R, Arg; S, Ser; T, Thr; V, Val, W, Trp; and Y, Tyr.
35. We thank S. Rousseau and P. Cohen for helpful discussions, S. Akira for TLR and MyD88 knockout mice, and A. Chow and I. Mellman for advice on retroviral DC transfection. This work was supported by a Medical Research Council Programme Grant to C.W. and A.R.P. and by the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research, Research Council, and Cancer Society.