Similarity networks of protein binding sites

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 470-478

  Zhang, Ziding ^a   Grigorov, Martin G ^a  

^a NESTLÉ RESEARCH CENTER   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Binding site; Complex network; Drug design; Fold; Scale free; Sequence; Small world

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; AMINOCAPROIC ACID; BENZAMIDINE; CHOLERA TOXIN; CITRIC ACID; GLYCOPEPTIDE; HIRUGEN; IMMUNOGLOBULIN; IMMUNOGLOBULIN F(AB) FRAGMENT; IMMUNOGLOBULIN G1; LECTIN; LIGAND; MANNOSE BINDING PROTEIN; MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY; N ACETYLGALACTOSAMINE; PHOSPHORYLCHOLINE; PHOSPHOTYROSINE; PROFLAVINE; PROTEIN; PROTEIN TYROSINE PHOSPHATASE 1B; SIALIDASE; TETRANECTIN; THROMBIN; TRYPSIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; DATA BASE; DRUG DESIGN; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING;

ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; DATABASES, PROTEIN; LIGANDS; METALLOPROTEASES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NERVE NET; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SWINE;

EID: 30144443247     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20752     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Strogatz SH. Exploring complex networks. Nature 2001;410:268-276.
2. Greene LH, Higman VA. Uncovering network systems within protein structures. J Mol Biol 2003;334:781-791.
3. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of "small-world" networks. Nature 1998;393:440-442.
4. Barabasi AL, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 1999;286:509-512.
5. Maslov S, Sneppen K. Specificity and stability in topology of protein networks. Science 2002;296:910-913.
6. Ravasz E, Somera AL, Mongru DA, Oltvai ZN, Barabasi AL. Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science 2002;297:1551-1555.
7. Shen-Orr SS, Milo R, Mangan S, Alon U. Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli. Nat Genet 2002;31:64-68.
8. Wuchty S. Evolution and topology in the yeast protein interaction network. Genome Res 2004;14:1310-1314.
9. Grigorov MG. Global properties of biological networks. Drug Discovery Today 2005;10:365-372.
10. Bork P, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, Ramani AK, Lee I, Marcotte EM. Protein interaction networks from yeast to human. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2004;14:292-299.
11. Wuchty S. Scale-free behavior in protein domain networks. Mol Biol Evol 2001;18:1694-1702.
12. Park J, Lappe M, Teichmann SA. Mapping protein family interactions: intramolecular and intermolecular protein family interaction repertoires in the PDB and yeast. J Mol Biol 2001;307:929-938.
13. Amitai G, Shemesh A, Sitbon E, Shklar M, Netanely D, Venger I, Pietrokovski S. Network analysis of protein structures identifies functional residues. J Mol Biol 2004;344:1135-1146.
14. Rao F, Caflisch A. The protein folding network. J Mol Biol 2004;342:299-306.
15. Qian J, Luscombe NM, Gerstein M. Protein family and fold occurrence in genomes: power-law behaviour and evolutionary model. J Mol Biol 2001;313:673-681.
16. Dokholyan NV, Shakhnovich B, Shakhnovich EI. Expanding protein universe and its origin from the biological Big Bang. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:14132-14136.
17. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
18. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. The protein structure prediction problem could be solved using the current PDB library. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:1029-1034.
19. Orengo CA, Todd AE, Thornton JM. From protein structure to function. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1999;9:374-382.
20. Wilson CA, Kreychman J, Gerstein, M. Assessing annotation transfer for genomics: quantifying the relations between protein sequence, structure and function through traditional and probabilistic scores. J Mol Biol 2000;297:233-249.
21. Nagano N, Orengo CA, Thornton JM. One fold with many functions: the evolutionary relationships between TIM barrel families based on their sequences, structures and functions. J Mol Biol 2002;321:741-765.
22. Morris RJ, Najmanovich RJ, Kahraman A, Thornton JM. Real spherical harmonic expansion coefficients as 3D shape descriptors for protein binding pocket and ligand comparisons. Bioinformatics 2005;21:2347-2355.
23. Stark A, Sunyaev S, Russell RB. A model for statistical significance of local similarities in structure. J Mol Biol 2003;326:1307-1316.
24. Kinoshita K, Nakamura H. Identification of protein biochemical functions by similarity search using the molecular surface database eF-site. Protein Sci 2003;12:1589-1595.
25. Artymiuk PJ, Poirrette AR, Grindley HM, Rice DW, Willett P. A graph-theoretic approach to the identification of three-dimensional patterns of amino acid side-chains in protein structures. J Mol Biol 1994;243:327-344.
26. Ferre F, Ausiello G, Zanzoni, A, Helmer-Citterich M. SURFACE: a database of protein surface regions for functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:D240-D244.
27. Binkowski TA, Adamian L, Liang J. Inferring functional relationships of proteins from local sequence and spatial surface patterns. J Mol Biol 2003;332:505-526.
28. Schmitt S, Kuhn D, Klebe G. A new method to detect related function among proteins independent of sequence and fold homology. J Mol Biol 2002;323:387-406.
29. Wallace AC, Borkakoti N, Thornton JM. TESS: a geometric hashing algorithm for deriving 3D coordinate templates for searching structural databases. Application to enzyme active sites. Protein Sci 1997;6:2308-2323.
30. Shulman-Peleg A, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Recognition of functional sites in protein structures. J Mol Biol 2004;339:607-633.
31. Jambon M, Imberty A, Deleage G, Geourjon C. A new bioinformatic approach to detect common 3D sites in protein structures. Proteins 2003;52:137-145.
32. Puvanendrampillai D, Mitchell JB. L/D Protein Ligand Database (PLD): additional understanding of the nature and specificity of protein-ligand complexes. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1856-1857.
33. Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. Protein Eng 1998;11:739-747.
34. Murphy LR, Wallqvist A, Levy RM. Simplified amino acid alphabets for protein fold recognition and implications for folding. Protein Eng 2000;13:149-152.
35. Bron C, Kerbosch J. Algorithm 457: Finding all cliques of an undirected graph. Commun ACM 1973;16:575-577.
36. Weskamp N, Kuhn D, Hullermeier E, Klebe G. Efficient similarity search in protein structure databases by k-clique hashing. Bioinformatics 2004;20:1522-1526.
37. Pearson WR, Lipman DJ. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988;85:2444-2448.
38. Laskowski RA, Watson JD, Thornton JM. From protein structure to biochemical function? J Struct Funct Genomics 2003;4:167-177.
39. Sterner R, Schmid FX. Biochemistry. De novo design of an enzyme. Science 2004;304:1916-1917.
40. Dwyer MA, Looger LL, Hellinga HW. Computational design of a biologically active enzyme. Science 2004;304:1967-1971.
41. Mestres J. Computational chemogenomics approaches to systematic knowledge-based drug discovery. Curr Opin Drug Discov Dev 2004;7:304-313.
42. Vendruscolo M, Dokholyan NV, Paci E, Karplus M. Small-world view of the amino acids that play a key role in protein folding. Phys Rev E 2002;65:061910-1-061910-4.