Framing ICT implementation in a context of educational change: A multilevel analysis

School Effectiveness and School Improvement

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 99-120

  Wong, Emily M L ^a   Li, S C ^a  

^a HONG KONG BAPTIST UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Collegiality; ICT implementation strategies; Managing change in schools; Multilevel models

Indexed keywords

EID: 40749161556     PISSN: 09243453     EISSN: 17445124     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09243450801896809     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., & Kefala, S. (2006). The ICT Impact Report: A review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.edu/education/doc/reports/doc/ ictimpact.pdf
2. Bober, M.J. (2002). Technology integration: The difficulties inherent in measuring pedagogical change. TechTrends, 46(1), 21-23.
3. Chan, D.K.K. (2002). Policy implications of adopting a managerial approach in education. In J.K.H. Mok & D.K.K. Chan (Eds.), Globalization and education: The quest for quality education in Hong Kong (pp. 243-258). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
4. Cheng, Y.C., & Townsend, T. (2000). Educational change and development in the Asia-Pacific region: Trends and issues. In T. Townsend & Y.C. Cheng (Eds.), Educational change and development in the Asia-Pacific region: Challenges for the future (pp. 317-343). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
5. Curriculum Development Council (2001). The way forward in curriculum development: Learning to learn, life-long learning and whole-person development. Hong Kong: HK Government Press.
6. Dexter, S.L., Anderson, R.E., & Becker, H.J. (2000). Teachers' views of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(3), 221-239.
7. Education and Manpower Bureau (1998). Information technology for learning in a new era five-year strategy 1998/99 to 2002/03. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government.
8. Freiberg, H.J., & Stein, T.A. (1999). Measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments. In H.J. Freiberg (Ed.), School climate: Measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments (pp. 11-29). London/Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
9. Fullan, M. (1992). Successful school improvement: The implementation perspective and beyond. Buckingham, UK/Philadelphia: Open University Press.
10. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London/New York: Falmer Press.
11. Fullan, M. (1996). Leadership for change. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 701-722). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Fullan, M., & Watson, N. (2000). School-based management: Reconceptualizing to improve learning outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 453-473.
13. Gonder, P.O. (1994). Improving school climate & culture. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
14. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R.H. (1998). Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 157-179.
15. Heck, R.H., & Thomas, S.L. (2000). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Heppell, S. (1993). Teacher education, learning and the information generation: The progression and evolution of educational computing against a background of change. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 2(2), 229-237.
17. Hinkin, T.R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104-121.
18. Honey, M., Culp, K.M., & Carrigg, F. (2000). Perspectives on technology and education research: Lessons from the past and present. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(1), 5-14.
19. Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Jonassen, D.H., Peck, K.L., & Wilson, B.G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle Rover, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
21. Kreft, I., & De Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London/ Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Lankshear, C., Snyder, I., & Green, B. (2000). Teachers and technoliteracy: Managing literacy, technology and learning in schools. St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
23. Law, N., Yuen, H.K., Ki, W.W., Li, S.C., & Lee, Y. (1999). Second International Information Technology in Education Study. Hong Kong: CITE, University of Hong Kong.
24. Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498-518.
25. Leithwood, K., & Duke, D.L. (1999). A century's quest to understand school leadership. In J. Murphy & K.S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration: A project of the American Educational Research Association (2nd ed., pp. 45-72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. Levin, B. (2001). Reforming education: From origins to outcomes. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
27. Little, J.W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers' professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509-536.
28. McCombs, B.L. (2000, September). Assessing the role of educational technology in the teaching and learning process: A learner-centred perspective. Paper presented at the Secretary's Conference on Educational Technology 2000: Measuring Impacts and Shaping the Future, Alexandria, VA.
29. McDonnell, L.M., & Elmore, R.F. (1991). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. In A.R. Odden (Ed.), Education policy implementation (pp. 157-183). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
30. McLaughlin, M.W. (1991). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. In A.R. Odden (Ed.), Education policy implementation (pp. 185-195). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
31. Means, B. (1994). Introduction: Using technology to advance educational goals. In B. Means (Ed.), Technology and education reform (pp. 1-21). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32. Mok, J.K.H., & Welch, A.R. (2002). Economic rationalism, managerialism and structural reform in education. In J.K.H. Mok & D.K.K. Chan (Eds.), Globalization and education: The quest for quality education in Hong Kong (pp. 23-40). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
33. Owens, R.G. (2001). Organizational behavior in education (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
34. Panel On Education Technology. (1997). Report to the president on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
35. Papert, S. (1997). Why school reform is impossible. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(4), 417-427.
36. Peter, J.P. (1981). Construct validity: A review of basic issues and marketing practices. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(2), 133-145.
37. Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA/London/New Delhi: Sage.
38. Raudenbush, S.W., Bryk, A.S., Cheong, Y.F., & Congdon, R.T. (2001). HLM 5: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
39. Raudenbush, S.W., & Willms, J.D. (1991). The organisation of schooling and its methodological implications. In S.W. Raudenbush & J.D. Willms (Eds.), Schools, classrooms, and pupils: International studies of schooling from a multilevel perspective (pp. 1-12). San Diego, New York: Academic Press.
40. Reinhartz, J., & Beach, D.M. (2004). Educational leadership: Changing schools, changing roles. Boston: Pearson.
41. Richardson, V. (2003). Constructivist pedagogy. Teachers College Record, 105(9), 1623-1640.
42. Rowen, B. (1990). Commitment and control: Alternative strategies for the organizational design of schools. Review of Research in Education, 16, 353-389.
43. Schein, E.H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
44. Senge, P.M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The Art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.
45. Sergiovanni, T.J. (1995). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective. Boston/London: Allyn and Bacon.
46. Sleegers, P., Geijsel, F., & Van den Berg, R. (2002). Conditions fostering educational change. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 75-102). Dordrecht, The Netherlands/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
47. Smylie, M.A., & Hart, A.W. (1999). School leadership for teacher learning and change: A human and social capital development perspective. In J. Murphy & K.S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration: A project of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 421-441). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
48. Smylie, M.A., Miretzky, D., & Konkol, P. (2004). Rethinking teacher workforce development: A strategic human resource management perspective. In M.A. Smylie & D. Miretzky (Eds.), Developing the teacher workforce (pp. 34-69). Chicago: NSSE.
49. Tiene, T., & Ingram, A. (2001). Exploring current issues in educational technology. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
50. Tse, T.K.C. (2002). A critical review of the quality education movement in Hong Kong. In J.K.H. Mok & D.K.K. Chan (Eds.), Globalization and education: The quest for quality education in Hong Kong (pp. 143-169). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
51. Valli, L., Cooper, D., & Frankes, L. (1997). Professional development schools and equity: A critical analysis of rhetoric and research. Review of Research in Education, 22, 251-304.
52. Van der Vegt, R., Smyth, L.F., & Vandenberghe, R. (2001). Implementing educational policy at the school level - Organization dynamics and teacher concerns. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(1), 8-23.
53. Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131-175.
54. Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers' use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 165-205.
55. Wong, E.M.L. (2006). Insights into the social ecology of ICT implementation in schools: A quantitative approach. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Baptist University. Unpublished PhD thesis.
56. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K.A. (2003). Factors affecting technology use in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807-840.