Changing the criterion for memory conformity in free recall and recognition

Memory

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 137-148

  Wright, Daniel ^a   Gabbert, Fiona ^b   Memon, Amina ^c   London, Kamala ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERTAY DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACE PROFILE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MENTAL CAPACITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION; WITNESS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SOCIAL CONFORMITY;

EID: 39749171753     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: 14640686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09658210701836174     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Allan, K. and Gabbert, F. I still think it was a banana: Memorable lies and forgettable truths. Acta Psychologica
2. Banks, W. P. (1970) Signal detection theory and human memory. Psychological Bulletin, 74, pp. 81-99.
3. Bartlett, F. C. (1932) Remembering: An experimental and social study, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
4. Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R. and Henry, S. (2000) Costs and benefits of collaborative remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, pp. 497-507.
5. Bates, D. and Sarkar, D. (2007) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes
6. Blank, H. (2005) Another look at retroactive and proactive interference: A quantitative analysis of conversion processes. Memory, 13, pp. 200-224.
7. Clark, S. E., Hori, A., Putnam, A. and Martin, T. P. (2000) Group collaboration in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, pp. 1578-1588.
8. Conover, W. J. and Iman, R. L. (1981) Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. American Statistician, 35, pp. 124-129.
9. Conway, M. A. and Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000) The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychological Review, 107, pp. 261-288.
10. Dalton, A. L. and Daneman, M. (2006) Social suggestibility to central and peripheral misinformation. Memory, 14, pp. 486-501.
11. DeCarlo, L. T. (1998) Signal detection theory and generalized linear models. Psychological Methods, 3, pp. 186-205.
12. Echterhoff, G., Hirst, W. and Hussy, W. (2005) How eyewitnesses resist misinformation: Social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristics. Memory & Cognition, 35, pp. 770-782.
13. Finlay, F., Hitch, G. J. and Meudell, P. R. (2000) Mutual inhibition in collaborative recall: Evidence for a retrieval-based account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, pp. 1556-1567.
14. Fisher, R. P. and Geiselman, R. E. (1992) Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview, C. C. Thomas, Springfield, IL
15. Forbes, K. E. and Venneri, A. (2003) A case for case: Handling letter case selection in written spelling. Neuropsychologia, 41, pp. 16-24.
16. Gabbert, F., Memon, A. and Allan, K. (2003) Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other's memories for an event?. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, pp. 533-543.
17. Gabbert, F., Memon, A., Allan, K. and Wright, D. B. (2004) Say it to my face: Examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 9, pp. 215-227.
18. Gabbert, F., Memon, A. and Wright, D. B. (2006) Memory conformity: Disentangling the steps towards influence during a discussion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, pp. 480-485.
19. Gabbert, F., Memon, A. and Wright, D. B. (2007) I saw it for longer than you: The relationship between perceived encoding duration and memory conformity. Acta Psychologica, 124, pp. 319-331.
20. Garry, M., French, L., Kinzett, T. and Mori, K. Eyewitness memory following discussion: Using the MORI technique with a Western sample. Applied Cognitive Psychology
21. Hope, L., Ost, J. and Gabbert, F. "With a little help from my friends.": The role of co-witness relationship in susceptibility to misinformation. Acta Psychologica
22. Kihlstrom, J. F. (2002) Memory, autobiography, history. Proteus: A Journal of Ideas, 19:2, pp. 1-6.
23. Koehnken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A. and Bull, R. (1999) A metaanalysis of the effects of the cognitive interview. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5, pp. 101-116.
24. Koriat, A. and Goldsmith, M. (1994) Memory in naturalistic and laboratory contexts: Distinguishing the accuracy-oriented and quantity-oriented approaches to memory assessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, pp. 297-315.
25. Macmillan, N. A. and Creelman, C. D. (2005) Detection theory: A user's guide (2nd ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, Mahwah, NJ
26. Marsh, E. J. and Tversky, B. (2004) Spinning the stories of our lives. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, pp. 491-503.
27. Meade, M. L. and Roediger, H. L. III. (2002) Explorations in the social contagion of memory. Memory & Cognition, 30, pp. 995-1009.
28. Memon, A. (2006) The cognitive interview. The handbook of communication skills, pp. 531-550. Routledge, London & New York
29. Memon, A. and Higham, P. (1999) A review of the cognitive interview. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, pp. 177-196.
30. Meudell, P. R., Hitch, G. J. and Boyle, M. M. (1995) Collaboration in recall: Do pairs of people cross cue each other to produce new memories?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, pp. 141-152.
31. Milne, R. and Bull, R. (2002) Back to basics: A componential analysis of the original cognitive interview mnemonics with three age groups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, pp. 743-753.
32. Mori, K. (2003) Surreptitiously projecting different movies to two subsets of viewers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, pp. 599-604.
33. Mori, K. (2007) A revised method for projecting two different movies to two groups of viewers without their noticing the duality. Behavior Research Methods, 39, pp. 574-578.
34. Paterson, H. M. (2004) Co-witnesses and the effects of discussion on eyewitness memory
35. Paterson, H. M. and Kemp, R. I. (2006) Co-witnesses talk: A survey of eyewitness discussion. Psychology, Crime and Law, 12, pp. 181-191.
36. Rajaram, S. and Pereira-Pasarin, L. P. (2007) Collaboration can improve individual recognition memory: Evidence from immediate and delayed tests. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, pp. 95-100.
37. Reysen, M. B. (2003) The effects of social pressure on group recall. Memory & Cognition, 31, pp. 1163-1168.
38. Reysen, M. B. (2005) The effects of social pressure on group recall. Memory & Cognition, 31, pp. 1163-1168.
39. Reysen, M. B. and Adair, S. A. Social processing improves recall performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
40. Roberts, W. T. and Higham, P. A. (2002) Selecting accurate statements from the cognitive interview using confidence ratings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, pp. 33-43.
41. Roediger, H. L., Meade, M. L. and Bergman, E. T. (2001) Social contagion of memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, pp. 365-371.
42. Roediger, H. L. III and McDermott, K. B. (1995) Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, pp. 803-814.
43. Schneider, D. M. and Watkins, M. J. (1996) Response conformity in recognition testing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, pp. 481-485.
44. Shaw, J. S. III, Garven, S. and Wood, J. M. (1997) Co-witness information can have immediate effects on eyewitness memory reports. Law and Human Behavior, 21, pp. 503-523.
45. Skagerberg, E. M. (2007) Co-witness feedback in line-ups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, pp. 489-497.
46. Skagerberg, E. M. and Wright, D. B. (2008) Manipulating power can affect memory conformity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, pp. 146-155.
47. Skagerberg, E. M. and Wright, D. B. The prevalence of co-witnesses and co-witness discussions in real eyewitnesses. Psychology, Crime, & Law
48. Swets, J. A., Dawes, R. M. and Monahan, J. (2000) Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, pp. 1-26.
49. Thompson, R. (2002) Are two heads better than one?. Psychologist, 15, pp. 616-619.
50. Weingardt, K. R., Toland, H. K. and Loftus, E. F. (1994) Reports of suggested memories: Do people truly believe them?. Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments, pp. 3-26. Cambridge University Press, New York
51. Weldon, M. S. (2000) Remembering as a social process. Psychology of learning and motivation, Academic Press, San Diego, CA
52. Wells, G. L., Memon, A. and Penrod, S. D. (2006) Eyewitness evidence: Improving its probative value. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, pp. 45-75.
53. Wright, D. B. (1997) Extra-binomial variation in multilevel logistic models with sparse structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 50, pp. 21-29.
54. Wright, D. B. and Klumpp, A. (2004) Collaborative inhibition is due to the product, not the process, of recalling in groups. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, pp. 1080-1083.
55. Wright, D. B., Mathews, S. A. and Skagerberg, E. M. (2005) Social recognition memory: The effect of other people's responses for previously seen and unseen items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, pp. 200-209.
56. Wright, D. B., Self, G. and Justice, C. (2000) Memory conformity: Exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person. British Journal of Psychology, 91, pp. 189-202.
57. Wright, D. B., Startup, H. M. and Mathews, S. A. (2005) Mood, dissociation, and false memories using the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm. British Journal of Psychology, 96, pp. 283-293.
58. Zho, X-H., Obuchowski, N. A. and McClish, D. K. (2002) Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York