A review of the cognitive interview

Psychology, Crime and Law

Volumn 5, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 177-196

  Memon, Amina ^a   Higham, Philip A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033265990     PISSN: 1068316X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10683169908415000     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Bekerian, D. L. and Dennett, J. L. (1992). The cognitive interview technique: Reviving the issues. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 275-97.
2. Bekerian, D. A. and Dennett, J. L. (1994). The fate of errors produced under the cognitive interview. Paper presented at the Practical Aspects of Memory Conference, Maryland, July 1994.
3. Bekerian, D. A. and Dennett, J. L. (1997). Imagery effects in spoken and written recall. In D. Payne and F. Conrad (Eds.) Intersections in Basic and Applied Memory Research (pp. 175-91). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Bjork, R. A. and Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1989). On the puzzling relationship between environmental context and human memory. In C. Izawa (Ed.) Current Issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Floweree Symposium on Cognition (pp. 313-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Bull, R. and Cherryman, J. (1996). Helping to identify skill gaps in specialist investigative interviewing: Enhancement of professional skills. Final Report to the Home Office Police Research Group, London, HMSO.
6. Dinges, D. F., Whitehouse, W. G., Orne, E. C., Powell, J. W., Orne, M. T. and Erdelyi, M. (1992). Evaluating hypnotic memory enhancement (hypermnesia and Reminisence) using multitrial forced recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 1139-47.
7. DasGupta, A., Juza, D. M., White, G. and Maloney, J. (1995) Memory and hypnosis: A comparative analysis of guided memory, cognitive interview and hypnotic hypermnesia. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 14, 117-30.
8. Eich, E. (1995). Mood as a mediator of place dependent memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(3), 293-308.
9. Fisher, R. P. (1995). Interviewing victims and witnesses of crime. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 1(4), 732-64.
10. Fisher, R. P. (1996). Misconceptions in design and analysis of research with the cognitive interview. Psycoloquy, 7(35), witness-memory.12.fisher.
11. Fisher, R. P. and Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The Cognitive Interview. Springfield III.: Charles C. Thomas.
12. Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E. and Amador, M. (1989). Field test of the cognitive interview: Enhancing the recollection of actual victims and witnesses of crime. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(5), 722-27.
13. Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E. and Raymond, D. S. (1987). Critical analysis of police interviewing techniques. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15, 177-85.
14. Fisher, R. P., Quigley, K. L., Brock, P., Chin, E. and Cutler, B. L. (1990). The effectiveness of the cognitive interview in description and identification tasks. Paper presented at the American Psychology-Law Society, Williamsburg, VA.
15. Foley, M. A., Durso, F. T., Wilder, A. and Freidman, R. (1991). Developmental comparisons of explicit versus implicit imagery and reality monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 1-13.
16. Gardiner, J. M. and Java (1993). Recognizing and remembering. In A. Collins, M. A. Conway, S. E. Gathercole and P. E. Morris (Eds.) Theories of Memory (pp. 163-88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Geiselman, R. E. and Callot, R. (1990). Reverse versus forward order recall of script based texts, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 141-4.
18. Geiselman, R. E. and Fisher, R. P. (1997). Ten years of cognitive interviewing. In D. Payne and F. Conrad (Eds.) Intersections in Basic and Applied Memory Research, (pp. 291-310). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., MacKinnon, D. P. and Holland, H. L. (1985). Eyewitness memory enhancement in the police interview: Cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus hypnosis, Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 401-12.
20. George, R. (1991). A field evaluation of the cognitive interview. Unpublished Masters Thesis, Polytechnic of East London.
21. Higham, P. A. (in press). Believing details known to have been suggested. British Journal of Psychology.
22. Higham, P. A. and Roberts, W. T. (1996a). Measuring recall performance. Psycoloquy, 7(38), witness-memory.13.higham.
23. Higham, P. A. and Roberts, W. T. (1996b) Analyzing states of consciousness during retrieval as a way to improve the cognitive interview. Psycoloquy 7(17), witness-memory.4.higham.
24. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S. and Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
25. Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Wang, A. W. and Taylor, T. H. (1979). Fact and fantasy: The roles of accuracy and variability in confusing imaginations with perceptual experiences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 229-40.
26. Kebbel, M. and Wagstaff, C. J. (1996). Enhancing the practicality of the cognitive interview in forensic situations. Psycoloquy, 7(16), witness-memory.3.kebbell.
27. Koehnken, G. (1995). Interviewing adults. In R. Bull and D. Carson (Eds.) Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts. Chichester: Wiley.
28. Koehnken, G., Thurer, C. and Zorberbier, D. (1994). The cognitive interview: Are interviewers memories enhanced too? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 13-24.
29. Koriat, A. and Goldsmith, M. (1994). Memory in naturalistic and laboratory contexts: Distinguishing the accuracy-oriented and quantity-oriented approaches to memory assessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 297-316.
30. Koriat, A. and Goldsmith, M. (1996a). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490-517.
31. Koriat, A. and Goldsmith, M. (1996b). Memory metaphors and the real-life/laboratory controversy: Correspondence versus storehouse conceptions of memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 167-88.
32. Koriat, A. and Goldsmith, M. (1996c). The correspondence metaphor of memory: Right, wrong or useful? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 211-22.
33. Koriat, A. and Goldsmith, M. (1996d). Memory as something that can be counted versus memory as something that can be counted on. In D. Hermann, C. McEvoy, C. Hertzog, P. Hertel and M. Johnson (Eds.) Basic and Applied Memory Research: Practical Applications, Vol. 2 (pp. 3-18). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Lindsay, D. S. and Johnson, M. K. (1989). The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source. Memory and Cognition, 17, 349-58.
35. McCauley, M. and Fisher, R. P. (1995). Facilitating children's eyewitness recall with the revised cognitive interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4), 510-17.
36. Malpass, R. (1996). Enhancing eyewitness memory. In S. L. Sporer., R. S. Malpass and G. Koehnken (Eds.) Psychological Issues in Eyewitness Identification. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Malpass, R. and Devine, P. (1981). Guided memory in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(3), 343-50.
38. Mello, E. W. and Fisher, R. P. (1996). Enhancing older adult eyewitness memory with the cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 403-18.
39. Memon, A. (1985). Context effects in face recognition. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham, U.K.
40. Memon, A. (1997). The cognitive interview. In O. Hargie (Ed.) A Handbook of Communication Skills. London and NY: Routledge.
41. Memon, A. and Bruce, V. (1985). Context effects in episodic studies of verbal and facial memory: A review. Current Psychological Research and Reviews, Winter 1985-86, 349-69.
42. Memon, A. and Bull, R. (1991). The cognitive interview: Its origins, empirical support, evaluation and practical implications. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 291-307.
43. Memon, A. and Koehnken, G. (1992). Helping interviewees to remember more: The Cognitive Interview. Expert Evidence, 1(2), 39-48.
44. Memon, A. and Stevenage, S. V. (1996a). Interviewing witnesses: What works and what doesn't? Psycoloquy, 7(6), witness memory.1.memon.
45. Memon, A. and Stevenage, S. V. (1996b). A clarification of the importance of comparison groups and accuracy rates with the CI. Psycoloquy, 7(41), witness-memory.14.memon.
46. Memon, A. and Stevenage, S. V. (1996c). The importance of time and training for CI interviewers. Psycoloquy, 7(18), witness-memory.5.memon.
47. Memon, A., Bull, R. and Smith, M. (1995). Improving the quality of the police interview: Can training in the use cognitive techniques help? Policing and Society, 5(1), 32-40.
48. Memon, A., Cronin, O., Eaves, R. and Bull, R. (1996a). An empirical test of the mnemonic components of the cognitive interview. In G. M. Davies, S. Lloyd-Bostock, M. McMurran and C. Wilson (Eds.) Psychology and Law: Advances in Research. Berlin: De Gruyter.
49. Memon, A., Wark, L., Bull, R. and Koehnken, G. (1997a). Isolating the effects of the cognitive interview techniques. British Journal of Psychology, 88(2), 179-198.
50. Memon, A., Milne, R., Holley, A., Bull, R. and Koehnken, G. (1994). Towards understanding the effects of interviewer training in evaluating the cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 641-59.
51. Memon, A., Wark, L., Holley, A., Bull, R. and Koehnken, G. (1996b). Reducing suggestibility in child witness interviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 503-18.
52. Memon, A., Wark, L., Holley, A., Bull, R. and Koehnken, G. (1997b). Eyewitness performance in cognitive and structured interviews. Memory, 5, 639-55.
53. Memon, A., Wark, L., Holley, A., Koehnken, G. and Bull, R. (1996c). Interviewer behaviour in structured and cognitive interviews. Psychology, Crime and the Law, 3, 181-201.
54. Memon, A., Wark, L., Holley, A., Koehnken, G. and Bull, R. (1997c). Context effects and event memory: how powerful are the effects? In D. Payne and F. Conrad (Eds.) Intersections in Basic and Applied Memory Research, (pp. 175-91). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
55. Milne, R. (1997). Application and analysis of the cognitive interview. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Portsmouth.
56. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and Verbal Processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
57. Payne, D. G. (1987) Hypermnesia and reminiscence in recall: A historical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 5-27.
58. Pinizzotto, A. J. (1989). Memory and hypnosis: Implications for use of forensic hypnosis. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 20, 322-28.
59. Roberts, K. (1996). How research on source monitoring can inform cognitive interview techniques. Psycoloquy, 7(44), witness-memory.15.roberts.
60. Sherman, S., Cialdini, R., Schwartzman, D. and Reynolds, K. (1985). Imagining can heighten or lower the perceived likelihood of contracting a disease: The mediating effects of ease of imagery. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 118-27.
61. Smith, S. (1988). Environmental context dependent memory. In G. Davies and D. Thomson (Eds.) Memory in Context: Context in Memory (pp. 13-34). London: Wiley.
62. Suengas, A. G. and Johnson, M. K. (1988). Qualitative effects of rehearsal on memories for perceived and imagined complex events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 377-89.
63. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 26, 1-12.
64. Tulving, E. and Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 353-70.
65. Turtle, J. (1995, July). Officers: What do they want? What have they got! Paper presented at the 1st biennial meeting of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, University of British Columbia.