Social recognition memory: The effect of other people's responses for previously seen and unseen items

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 200-209

  Wright, Daniel B ^a   Mathews, Sorcha A ^a   Skagerberg, Elin M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conformity; Eyewitness; Memory; Misinformation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; RECOGNITION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TIME; VISION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 27644544860     PISSN: 1076898X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1076-898X.11.3.200     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adams, E. J., & Wright, D. B. (2001, July 16-20). "Memory for vehicles." Paper presented at the Third International Conference of Memory (ICOM 3), Valencia, Spain.
2. Arndt, J., & Reder, L. A. (2002). Word frequency and receiver operating characteristic curves in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 830-842.
3. Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31-35.
4. Baguley, T. (2004). Understanding statistical power in the context of applied research. Applied Ergonomics, 35, 73-80.
5. Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., & Henry, S. (2000). Costs and benefits of collaborative remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 497-507.
6. Basden, B. H., Reysen, M. B., & Basden, D. R. (2002). Transmitting false memories in social groups. American Journal of Psychology, 115, 211-231.
7. Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2002). Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 164-169.
8. Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., Wright, R., & Mojardin, A. H. (2003). Recollection rejection: False-memory editing in children and adults. Psychological Review, 110, 762-784.
9. Clark, S. E., Hori, A., Putnam, A., & Martin, T. P. (2000). Group collaboration in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1578-1588.
10. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.
11. Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000). The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychological Review, 107, 261-288.
12. DeCarlo, L. T. (1998). Signal detection theory and generalized linear models. Psychological Methods, 3, 186-205.
13. Dempster, A., Laird, N., & Rubin, D. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: B, 39, 1-38.
14. Donaldson, W. (1996). The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing. Memory & Cognition, 24, 523-533.
15. Dunn, J. C. (2004). Remember-know: A matter of confidence. Psychological Review, 111, 524-542.
16. Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Allan, K. (2003). Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other's memories for an event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 533-543.
17. Gabbert, F., Memon, A., Allan, K., & Wright, D. B. (2004). Say it to my face: Examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 215-227.
18. Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C. S., Baddeley, A. D., & Emslie, H. (1994). The Children's Test of Phonological Working Memory. Memory, 2, 103-127.
19. Ghetti, S. (2003). Memory for nonoccurrences: The role of metacognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 722-739.
20. Goldstein, H. (2003). Multilevel statistical models (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
21. Kihlstrom, J. F. (2002). Memory, autobiography, history. Proteus: A Journal of Ideas, 19(2), 1-6.
22. Kilgarriff, A. (1997). Putting frequencies in the dictionary. International Journal of Lexicography, 10, 135-155.
23. Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., & Pansky, A. (2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 483-531.
24. Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Loftus, E. F. (1993). The reality of repressed memories. American Psychologist, 48, 518-537.
26. Loftus, E. F., Donders, K., Hoffman, H. G., & Schooler, J. W. (1989). Creating new memories that are quickly accessed and confidently held. Memory & Cognition, 17, 607-616.
27. Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19-31.
28. MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7, 19-40.
29. Marsh, E. J., Tversky, B., & Hutson, M. (2005). How eyewitnesses talk about events: Implications for memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 531-544.
30. Mazzoni, G. A. L., Loftus, E. F., & Kirsh, I. (2001). Changing beliefs about implausible autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 51-59.
31. Meade, M. L., & Roediger, H. L., III (2002). Explorations in the social contagion of memory. Memory & Cognition, 30, 995-1009.
32. Memon, A., & Wright, D. B. (1999). The search for John Doe 2: Eyewitness testimony and the Oklahoma bombing. The Psychologist, 12, 292-295.
33. Ost, J., Costall, A., & Bull, R. (2002). A perfect symmetry? A study of retractors' experiences of making and then repudiating claims of early sexual abuse. Psychology, Crime & Law, 8, 155-181.
34. Rasbash, J., Browne, W., Healy, M., Cameroon, B., & Charlton, C. (2004). MLwiN 2.00. London: Institute of Education, Multilevel Models Project.
35. Reysen, M. B. (2005). The effects of conformity on recognition judgments. Memory, 13, 87-94.
36. Roediger, H. L., III, Meade, M. L., & Bergman, E. T. (2001). Social contagion of memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 365-371.
37. Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in list. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814.
38. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioural research: A correlational approach. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
39. Rotello, C. M. (1999). Metacognition and memory for non-occurrence. Memory, 7, 43-63.
40. Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., & Reeder, J. A. (2004). Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: A two-dimensional signal-detection model. Psychological Review, 111, 588-616.
41. Schacter, D. L. (2001). The seven sins of memory: How the mind forgets and remembers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
42. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Schneider, D. M., & Watkins, M. J. (1996). Response conformity in recognition testing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 481-485.
44. Shaw, J. S., III, Garven, S., & Wood, J. M. (1997). Co-witness information can have immediate effects on eyewitness memory reports. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 503-523.
45. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 26, 1-12.
46. Vacha-Haase, T., & Thompson, B. (2004). How to estimate and interpret various effect sizes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 473-481.
47. Weldon, M. S. (2000). Remembering as a social process. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation. San Diego, CA.: Academic Press.
48. Weldon, M. S., & Bellinger, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1160-1175.
49. Wright, D. B. (1998). Modelling clustered data in autobiographical memory research: The multilevel approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 339-357.
50. Wright, D. B. (2003). Making friends with your data: Improving how statistics are conducted and reported. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 123-136.
51. Wright, D. B., Boyd, C. E., & Tredoux, C. G. (2003). Inter-racial contact and the own race bias for face recognition in South Africa and England. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 365-373.
52. Wright, D. B., & Davies, G. M. (1999). Eyewitness testimony. In F. T. Durso, Nickerson, R. S., Schvaneveldt, R. W., Dumais, S. T., Lindsay, D. S., & Chi, M. T. H. (Eds.), Handbook of applied cognition (pp. 789-818). New York: Wiley.
53. Wright, D. B., & Klumpp, A. (2004). Collaborative inhibition is due to the product, not the process, of recalling in groups. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1080-1083.
54. Wright, D. B., Loftus, E. F., & Hall, M. (2001). Now you see it; now you don't: Inhibiting recall and recognition of scenes. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 471-482.
55. Wright, D. B., Self, G., & Justice, C. (2000). Memory conformity: Exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 189-202.
56. Wright, D. B., & Stroud, J. N. (1998). Memory quality and misinformation for peripheral and central objects. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 273-286.
57. Yonelinas, A. P. (2001). Consciousness, control, and confidence: The 3 Cs of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 361-379.