Co-witness feedback in line-ups

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 489-497

  Skagerberg, Elin M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; OFFENDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOANALYSIS; RECALL; RECOGNITION; RELIABILITY; UNIVERSITY STUDENT; WITNESS;

EID: 34248379610     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1285     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bradfield, A. L., & Wells, G. L. (2000). The perceived validity of eyewitness identification testimony: A test of the five Biggers criteria. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 581-594.
2. Dixon, S., & Memon, A. (2005). The effect of post-identification feedback on the recall of crime and perpetrator details. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 935-951.
3. Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Allan, K. (2003). Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other's memories for an event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 533-543.
4. Gabbert, E, Memon, A., Allan, K., & Wright, D. B. (2004). Say it to my face: Examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 215-227.
5. Gabbert, E, Memon, A., & Wright, D. B. (2006). Memory conformity: Disentangling the steps towards influence during a discussion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 480-485.
6. Hafstad, G. S., Memon, A., & Logie, R. (2004). Post-identification feedback, confidence and recollections of witnessing conditions in child witnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 901-912.
7. Harley, E. M., Carlsen, K. A., & Loftus, G. R. (2004). The 'saw it all along effect': Demonstrations of visual hindsight bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 960-968.
8. Lindsay, S. D. (1990). Misleading suggestions can impair eyewitnesses' ability to remember event details. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory an Cognition, 16, 1077-1083.
9. Loftus, E. F. (1974). Reconstructing memory: The incredible eyewitness. Psychology Today, 8, 116-119.
10. Loftus, E. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Loftus, E. F, & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585-589.
12. Luus, C. A. E., & Wells, G. L. (1994). The malleability of eyewitness confidence: Co witness and perseverance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 714-723.
13. Memon, A., & Wright, D. B. (1999). The search for John Doe 2: Eyewitness testimony and the Oklahoma bombing. The Psychologist, 12, 292-295.
14. Neuschatz, J. S., Preston, E. L., Burkett, A. D., Toglia, M. R., Lampinen, J. M., Neuschatz, J. S., Fairless, A. H., Lawson, D. S., Powers, R. A., & Goodsell, C. A. (2005). The effects of postidentification feedback and age on retrospective eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 435-453.
15. Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I. (2006). Co-witnesses talk: A survey of eyewitness discussion. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 12, 181-191.
16. Powles, M. (2005). Inspector at the Sussex Police. Personal communication whilst working there June/July 2005.
17. Schacter, D. L. (2001). The seven sins of memory: How the mind forgets and remembers. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
18. Scheck, B., Neufeld, P., & Dwyer, J. (2003). Actual innocence: When justice goes wrong and how to make it right. New York: New American Library.
19. Semmler, C., Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2004). Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 334-346.
20. Shaw, J. S., Garven, S., & Wood, J. M. (1997). Co-witness information can have immediate effects on eyewitness memory reports. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 503-521.
21. Wells, G. L., & Bradfield, A. L. (1998). 'Good you identified the suspect': Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 360-376.
22. Wells, G. L., Malpass, R. S., Lindsay, R. C. L., Fisher, R. P., Turtle, J. W., & Fulero, S. M. (2000). From the lab to the police station: A successful application of eyewitness research. American Psychologist, 55, 581-598.
23. Wells, G. L., Olson, E. A., & Charman, S. D. (2003). Distorted retrospective eyewitness reports as a function of feedback and delay. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 42-52.
24. Wright, D. B., & Loftus, E. F. (2006). Eyewitness memory. In A. Heaton-Armstrong, E. Shepherd, G. Gudjonsson, & D. Wolchover (Eds.), Witness Testimony: Psychological, investigative and forensic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Wright, D. B., Mathews, S. A., & Skagerberg, E. M. (2005). Social recognition memory: The effect of other people's responses for previously seen and unseen items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 200-209.
26. Wright, D. B., & McDaid, A. T. (1996). Comparing system and estimator variables using data from real line-ups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 75-84.
27. Wright, D. B., Self, G., & Justice, C. (2000). Memory conformity: Exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 189-202.