Can molecular dynamics simulations help in discriminating correct from erroneous protein 3D models?

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 9, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Taly, Jean François ^a   Marin, Antoine ^a   Gibrat, Jean François ^a  

^a INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CONFORMATIONAL SPACE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; POTENTIAL FUNCTION; REDUCED REPRESENTATION; ROOT-MEAN SQUARE DEVIATION; SECONDARY STRUCTURES; THREE DIMENSIONAL (3D) STRUCTURES;

AMINO ACIDS; CONFORMATIONS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROTEINS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

MONTE CARLO METHODS;

STRUCTURAL PROTEIN; PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STRUCTURAL PROTEOMICS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; EVALUATION; KINETICS; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; KINETICS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN;

EID: 39449089086     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-6     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Kryshtafovych A Venclovas C Fidelis K Moult J Progress over the first decade of CASP experiments Proteins 2005, 61(Suppl 7):225-36. 10.1002/ prot.20740 16187365
2. Oldziej S Czaplewski C Liwo A Chinchio M Nanias M Vila JA Khalili M Arnautova YA Jagielska A Makowski M Schafroth HD Kazmierkiewicz R Ripoll DR Pillardy J Saunders JA Kang YK Gibson KD Scheraga HA Physics-based protein-structure prediction using a hierarchical protocol based on the UNRES force field: Assessment in two blind tests Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:7547-52. 1140449 15894609 10.1073/pnas.0502655102
3. Schueler-Furman O Wang C Bradley P Misura K Baker D Progress in modeling of protein structures and interactions Science 2005, 310:638-42. 10.1126/ science.1112160 16254179
4. Lazaridis T Karplus M Effective energy functions for protein structure prediction Curr Opin Struct Biol 2000, 10:139-45. 10.1016/ S0959-440X(00)00063-4 10753811
5. Novotny J Bruccoleri R Karplus M An analysis of incorrectly folded protein models. Implications for structure predictions J Mol Biol 1984, 177:787-818. 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90049-4 6434748
6. Novotny J Rashin AA Bruccoleri RE Criteria that discriminate between native proteins and incorrectly folded models Proteins 1988, 4:19-30. 10.1002/prot.340040105 3186690
7. Vorobjev YN Almagro JC Hermans J Discrimination between native and intentionally misfolded conformations of proteins: ES/IS, a new method for calculating conformational free energy that uses both dynamics simulations with an explicit solvent and an implicit solvent continuum model Proteins 1998, 32:399-413. 10.1002/ (SICI)1097-0134(19980901)32:4<399::AID-PROT1>3.0.CO;2-C 9726412
8. Janardhan A Vajda S Selecting near-native conformations in homology modeling: The role of molecular mechanics and solvation terms Protein Sci 1998, 7:1772-80. 2144075 10082374
9. Lazaridis T Karplus M Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation J Mol Biol 1999, 288:477-87. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2685 10329155
10. Gatchell DW Dennis S Vajda S Discrimination of near-native protein structures from misfolded models by empirical free energy functions Proteins 2000, 41:518-34. 10.1002/ 1097-0134(20001201)41:4<518::AID-PROT90>3.0.CO;2-6 11056039
11. Kinjo AR Kidera A Nakamura H Nishikawa K Physicochemical evaluation of protein folds predicted by threading Eur Biophys J 2001, 30:1-10. 10.1007/s002490000111 11372527
12. Dominy BN Brooks CL III Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials J Comput Chem 2002, 23:147-60. 10.1002/ jcc.10018 11913380
13. Felts AK Gallicchio E Wallqvist A Levy RM Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model Proteins 2002, 48:404-22. 10.1002/ prot.10171 12112706
14. Lee MR Tsai J Baker D Kollman PA Molecular dynamics in the endgame of protein structure prediction J Mol Biol 2001, 313:417-30. 10.1006/ jmbi.2001.5032 11800566
15. Fan H Mark AE Refinement of homology-based protein structures by molecular dynamics simulation techniques Protein Sci 2004, 13:211-20. 10.1110/ps.03381404 14691236
16. Chen J Brooks CL 3rd Can molecular dynamics simulations provide high-resolution refinement of protein structure? Proteins 2007, 67(4):922-930. 10.1002/prot.21345 17373704
17. Marin A Pothier J Zimmermann K Gibrat JF FROST: A filter-based fold recognition method Proteins 2002, 49:493-509. 10.1002/prot.10231 12402359
18. Andreeva A Howorth D Brenner SE Hubbard TJ Chothia C Murzin AG SCOP database in 2004: Refinements integrate structure and sequence family data Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32:D226-9. 308773 14681400 10.1093/nar/ gkh039
19. Melo F Sanchez R Sali A Statistical potentials for fold assessment Protein Sci 2002, 11:430-48. 10.1110/ps.25502 11790853
20. Hess B Similarities between principal components of protein dynamics and random diffusion Phys Rev E 2000, 62:8438-48. 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.8438
21. Hess B Convergence of sampling in protein simulations Phys Rev E 2002, 65:031910,1-031910,10. 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.031910
22. Kabsch W Sander C Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features Biopolymers 1983, 22(12):2577-637. 10.1002/bip.360221211 6667333
23. Gilquin B Guilbert C Perahia D Unfolding of hen egg lysozyme by molecular dynamics simulations at 300 K: Insight into the role of the interdomain interface Proteins 2000, 41:58-74. 10.1002/ 1097-0134(20001001)41:1<58::AID-PROT90>3.0.CO;2-3 10944394
24. Bradley P Misura KM Baker D Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins Science 2005, 309:1868-71. 10.1126/ science.1113801 16166519
25. Kmiecik S Gront D Kolinski A Towards the high-resolution protein structure prediction. Fast refinement of reduced models with all-atom force field BMC Struct Biol 2007, 7:43. 1933428 17603876 10.1186/ 1472-6807-7-43
26. Simmerling C Lee MR Ortiz AR Kolinski A Skolnick J Kollman PA Combining MONSSTER and LES/PME to predict protein structure from amino acid sequence: Application to the small protein CMTI-1 J Am Chem Soc 2000, 122:8392-8402. 10.1021/ja993119k
27. Bryson K Loux V Bossy R Nicolas P Chaillou S van de Guchte M Penaud S Maguin E Hoebeke M Bessieres P Gibrat JF AGMIAL: Implementing an annotation strategy for prokaryote genomes as a distributed system Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34:3533-45. 1524909 16855290 10.1093/nar/gkl471
28. Chandonia JM Walker NS Lo Conte L Koehl P Levitt M Brenner SE ASTRAL compendium enhancements Nucleic Acids Res 2002, 30:260-3. 99063 11752310 10.1093/nar/30.1.260
29. Madej T Gibrat JF Bryant SH Threading a database of protein cores Proteins 1995, 23:356-69. 10.1002/prot.340230309 8710828
30. Gibrat JF Madej T Bryant SH Surprising similarities in structure comparison Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996, 6:377-85. 10.1016/ S0959-440X(96)80058-3 8804824
31. Zhang Y Skolnick J Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality Proteins 2004, 57:702-10. 10.1002/prot.20264 15476259
32. Sali A Blundell TL Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints J Mol Biol 1993, 234:779-815. 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626 8254673
33. Van Der Spoel D Lindahl E Hess B Groenhof G Mark AE Berendsen HJ GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free J Comput Chem 2005, 26:1701-18. 10.1002/jcc.20291 16211538
34. Caves L Evanseck J Karplus M Locally accessible conformations of proteins: Multiple molecular dynamics simulations of crambin Protein Sci 1998, 7:649-66. 2143962 9541397
35. McQuarrie DA Statistical Mechanics New-York: HarperCollins 1976.
36. Eisenberg D Luthy R Bowie JU VERIFY3D: Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles Methods Enzymol 1997, 277:396-404. 9379925
37. Humphrey W Dalke A Schulten K VMD - Visual Molecular Dynamics J Molec Graphics 1996, 14:33-38. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5