Towards the high-resolution protein structure prediction. Fast refinement of reduced models with all-atom force field

BMC Structural Biology

Volumn 7, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Kmiecik, Sebastian ^a   Gront, Dominik ^a   Kolinski, Andrzej ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; GENOME; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; TIME;

PROTEIN;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34547620863     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6807-7-43     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Progress in modeling of protein structures and interactions. O Schueler-Furman C Wang P Bradley K Misura D Baker, Science 2005 310 5748 638 642 10.1126/science.1112160 16254179
2. Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins. P Bradley KM Misura D Baker, Science 2005 309 5742 1868 1871 10.1126/science. 1113801 16166519
3. Automated modeling of coiled coils: application to the GCN4 dimerization region. M Nilges AT Brunger, Protein engineering 1991 4 6 649 659 10.1093/protein/4.6.649 1946322
4. Prediction of the folding pathways and structure of the GCN4 leucine zipper. M Vieth A Kolinski CL Brooks 3rd J Skolnick, Journal of molecular biology 1994 237 4 361 367 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1239 8151697
5. Combining MONSSTER and LES/PME to Predict Protein Structure from Amino Acid Sequence: Application to the Small Protein CMTI-1. C Simmerling MR Lee AR Ortiz A Kolinski J Skolnick PA Kollman, J Am Chem Soc 2000 122 35 8392 88402 10.1021/ja993119k
6. Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. MJ Sippl, Current opinion in structural biology 1995 5 2 229 235 10.1016/0959-440X(95)80081-6 7648326
7. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. S Miyazawa RL Jernigan, Journal of molecular biology 1996 256 3 623 644 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0114 8604144
8. Molecular dynamics in the endgame of protein structure prediction. MR Lee J Tsai D Baker PA Kollman, Journal of molecular biology 2001 313 2 417 430 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5032 11800566
9. Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials. BN Dominy CL Brooks, J Comput Chem 2002 23 1 147 160 10.1002/jcc.10018 11913380
10. Evaluating CASP4 predictions with physical energy functions. M Feig CL Brooks 3rd, Proteins 2002 49 2 232 245 10.1002/prot.10217 12211003
11. Exploring protein energy landscapes with hierarchical clustering. D Gront UH Hansmann A Kolinski, Int J Quantum Chem 2005 105 6 826 830 16479277 10.1002/qua.20741
12. A composite score for predicting errors in protein structure models. D Eramian MY Shen D Devos F Melo A Sali MA Marti-Renom, Protein Sci 2006 15 7 1653 1666 10.1110/ps.062095806 16751606
13. GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. DT Jones, Journal of molecular biology 1999 287 4 797 815 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2583 10191147
14. Can correct protein models be identified? B Wallner A Elofsson, Protein Sci 2003 12 5 1073 1086 10.1110/ps.0236803 12717029
15. Refinement of homology-based protein structures by molecular dynamics simulation techniques. H Fan AE Mark, Protein Sci 2004 13 1 211 220 10.1110/ps.03381404 14691236
16. Ab initio construction of protein tertiary structures using a hierarchical approach. Y Xia ES Huang M Levitt R Samudrala, Journal of molecular biology 2000 300 1 171 185 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3835 10864507
17. Protein modeling and structure prediction with a reduced representation. A Kolinski, Acta biochimica Polonica 2004 51 2 349 371 15218533
18. Generalized protein structure prediction based on combination of fold-recognition with de novo folding and evaluation of models. A Kolinski JM Bujnicki, Proteins 2005 61 84 90 10.1002/prot.20723 16187348
19. CASP6 Home page. http://predictioncenter.org/casp6/
20. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. A Sali TL Blundell, Journal of molecular biology 1993 234 3 779 815 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626 8254673
21. Backbone building from quadrilaterals: A fast and accurate algorithm for protein backbone reconstruction from alpha carbon coordinates. D Gront S Kmiecik A Kolinski, J Comput Chem 2007 28 9 1593 1597 10.1002/jcc.20624 17342707
22. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys. B Park M Levitt, Journal of molecular biology 1996 258 2 367 392 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0256 8627632
23. Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. BH Park ES Huang M Levitt, Journal of molecular biology 1997 266 4 831 846 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0809 9102472
24. Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation. T Lazaridis M Karplus, Journal of molecular biology 1999 288 3 477 487 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2685 10329155
25. Discrimination between native and intentionally misfolded conformations of proteins: ES/IS, a new method for calculating conformational free energy that uses both dynamics simulations with an explicit solvent and an implicit solvent continuum model. YN Vorobjev JC Almagro J Hermans, Proteins 1998 32 4 399 413 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19980901)32:4<399::AID-PROT1>3.0.CO;2-C 9726412
26. Modelling the polypeptide backbone with 'spare parts' from known protein structures. M Claessens E Van Cutsem I Lasters S Wodak, Protein engineering 1989 2 5 335 345 10.1093/protein/2.5.335 2928296
27. Amber 7. DA Case Pearlman, D.A., Caldwell, J.W., Cheatham,T.E. III, Wang, J., Ross, W.S., Simmerling, C.L., Darden, T.A., Merz, K.M., Stanton, R.V., Cheung, A.I., Vincent, J.J., Crowley, M., Tsui, V., Gohike, H., Radmer, R.J., Duan, Y., Pitera, J., Massova, I., Seibel, G.L., Singh, U.C., Weiner, P.K., Kollman, P.A., University of California, San Francisco 2002
28. Effective energy functions for protein structure prediction. T Lazaridis M Karplus, Current opinion in structural biology 2000 10 2 139 145 10.1016/S0959-440X(00)00063-4 10753811
29. Comparative protein structure modeling by iterative alignment, model building and model assessment. B John A Sali, Nucleic acids research 2003 31 14 3982 3992 12853614 10.1093/nar/gkg460
30. HCPM - program for hierarchical clustering of protein models. D Gront A Kolinski, Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2005 21 14 3179 3180 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti450 15840705
31. Improving sequence-based fold recognition by using 3D model quality assessment. CS Pettitt LJ McGuffin DT Jones, Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2005 21 17 3509 3515 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti540 15955780
32. BioShell - a package of tools for structural biology computations. D Gront A Kolinski, Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2006 22 5 621 622 10.1093/bioinformatics/btk037 16407320
33. Home page of the Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers. http://www.biocomp.chem.uw.edu.pl