Thinking the impossible: How to solve the protein folding problem with and without homologous structures and more

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 350, Issue , 2006, Pages 305-320

  Casadio, Rita ^a   Fariselli, Piero ^a   Martelli, Pier Luigi ^a   Tasco, Gianluca ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

3D modeling of globular proteins; 3D modeling of membrane proteins; Ab initio methods; Building by homology; Prediction of protein interacting patches; Protein folding; Protein structure prediction; Remote homologs; Threading; Validation

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE; BETA3 INTEGRIN; GLOBULAR PROTEIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; PROTEIN GLUTAMINE GAMMA GLUTAMYLTRANSFERASE; VASOPRESSIN; PROTEIN;

AB INITIO CALCULATION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; LIGAND BINDING; MACHINE LEARNING; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SULFOLOBUS SOLFATARICUS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; SULFOLOBUS;

ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SULFOLOBUS; TRANSGLUTAMINASES;

EID: 39049189646     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: 19406029     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1385/1-59745-189-4:305     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Sternberg, M. (1997) Protein Structure Prediction: A Practical Approach, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
2. Lesk, A. M. (2005) Introduction to Bioinformatics, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
3. Rost, B. (1999) Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng. 12, 85-94.
4. Sanchez, R., Pieper, U., Melo, F., et al. (2000) Protein structure modeling for structural genomics. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7 Suppl, 986-990.
5. Moult, J. (2005) A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15, 285-289.
6. Bourne, P. E. (2003) CASP and CAFASP experiments and their findings. Methods Biochem. Anal. 44, 501-507.
7. Bonneau, R., Strauss, C. E., Rohl, C. A., et al. (2002) De novo prediction of threedimensional structures for major protein families. J. Mol. Biol. 322, 65-78.
8. Friedberg, I., Jaroszewski, L. Y., and Godzik, A. (2004) The interplay of fold recognition and experimental structure determination in structural genomics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14, 307-312.
9. Capriotti, E., Fariselli, P., Rossi, I., and Casadio, R. (2004) A Shannon entropybased filter detects high-quality profile-profile alignments in searches for remote homologues. Proteins 54, 351-360.
10. Prybylski, D. and Rost B. (2004) Improving fold recognition without folds. J. Mol. Biol. 341, 255-269.
11. Tramontano, A. (2005) The Ten Most Wanted Solutions in Protein Bioinformatics, CRC Press, London, UK.
12. Kelley, L. A., McCallum, R. M., and Sternberg, M. J. (2000) Enhanced genome annotation using structural profiles in the program 3D-PSSM. J. Mol. Biol. 299, 499-520.
13. Rost, B. (1995) TOPITS: threading one-dimensional predictions into threedimensional structures. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 3, 314-321.
14. Mc Guffin, L. J. and Jones, D. T. (2003) Improvement of the GenTHREADER method for genomic fold recognition. Bioinformatics 19, 874-881.
15. Fischer, D. (2003) 3D-SHOTGUN: a novel, cooperative, fold-recognition metapredictor. Proteins 51, 434-441.
16. Sali, A. and Blundell, T. L. (1993) Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779-781.
17. Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S., and Thornton, J. M. (1993) PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Cryst. 26, 283-291.
18. Sippl, M. J. (1993) Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins 17, 355-362.
19. Vriend, G. (1990) WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program. J. Mol. Graph. 8, 52-56.
20. Casadio, R., Fariselli, P., and Martelli, P. L. (2003) In silico prediction of the structure of membrane proteins: is it feasible? Brief Bioinf. 4, 341-348.
21. Casadio, R., Jacoboni, I., Messina, A., and De Pinto, V. (2002) A 3D model of the voltage-dependent anion channel. FEBS Lett. 520, 1-7.
22. Aiello, R., Messina, A., Schiffler, B., et al. (2004) Functional characterization of a second porin isoform in drosophila melanogster: DmPorin2 forms voltage-independent cation selective pores. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 25,364-25,373.
23. Morozzo della Rocca, B., Miniero, D. V., Tasco, G., et al. (2005) Substrate-induced conformational changes of the mitochondrial oxoglutarate carrier: a spectroscopic and molecular modelling study. Mol. Membr. Biol. 22, 443-445.
24. Casadio, R., Compiani, M., Facchiano, A., et al. (2002) Protein structure prediction and biomolecular recognition: from protein sequence to peptidomimetic design with the human beta 3 integrin SAR QSAR Envir Res 13, 473-486.
25. Casadio, R., Polverini, E., Mariani, P., et al. (1999) The structural basis for the regulation of tissue transglutaminase by calcium ions. Eur. J. Biochem. 262, 672-679.
26. Calonghi, N., Cappadone, C., Pagnotta, E., et al. (2005) Histone deacetylase 1: a target of 9-hydroxystearic acid in the inhibition of cell growth in human colon cancer. J. Lipid Res. 46, 1569-1603.
27. Menotti, L., Casadio, R., Bertucci, C., Lopez, M., and Campadelli-Fiume, G. (2002) Substitution in the murine nectin1 receptor of a single conserved amino acid at a position distal from the Herpes Simplex virus gD binding site confers high-affinity binding to gD. J. Virol. 76, 5463-5471.
28. Casadio, R., Martelli, P. L., Giordano, A., Rossi, M., and Raia, C. A. (2002) A lowresolution 3D model of the tetrameric alcohol dehydrogenase from Sulfolobus solfataricus. Protein Eng. 15, 215-223.
29. Occhipinti, E., Martelli, P. L., Spinozzi, F., et al. (2003) 3D structure of Sulfolobus solfataricus carboxypeptidase developed by molecular modeling is confirmed by site-directed mutagenesis and small angle X-ray scattering. Biophys. J. 85, 1165-1175.
30. Xiong, J. P., Stehle, T., Zhang, R., et al. (2002) Crystal structure of the extracellular segment of Integrin alpha V-beta3 in complex with an Arg-Gly-Asp ligand. Science 296, 151-155.
31. Liu, S., Ceriona, R. A., and Clardy, J. (2002) Structural basis for the guanine nucleotide-binding activity of tissue transglutaminase and its regulation of transamidation activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 2743–2747.
32. Esposito, L., Sica, F., Raia, C. A., et al. (2002) Crystal structure of alcohol dehydrogenase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus Solfataricus at 1.85 Angstrom resolution J. Mol. Biol. 318, 463–477.
33. Aloy, P., Pichaut, M., and Russel, R. B. (2005) Protein complexes: structure prediction challenges for the 21st century. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15, 15–22.
34. Fariselli, P., Pazos, F., Valencia, A., and Casadio, R. (2002) Prediction of protein–protein interaction sites in heterocomplexes with neural networks. Eur. J. Biochem. 269, 1356–1361.
35. Fariselli, P., Zauli, A., Rossi, I., Finelli, M., Martelli, P. L., and Casadio, R. (2003) A neural network method to improve prediction of protein–protein interaction sites in heterocomplexes. Proc 13th IEEE Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing (NNSP’03) 13, 33–41.
36. Jacoboni, I., Martelli, P. L., Fariselli, P., Compiani, M., and Casadio, R. (2000) Predictions of protein segments with the same aminoacid sequence and different secondary structure: a benchmark for predictive methods. Proteins 41, 535–544.
37. Martelli, P. L., Fariselli, P., Malaguti, L., and Casadio, R. (2002) Prediction of the disulfide bonding state of cysteines in proteins with hidden neural networks. Protein Eng. 15, 951–953.
38. Kabsch W. and Sander, C. (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22, 2577–2637.
39. Shindyalov, I. N. and Bourne, P. E. (1998) Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. Protein Eng. 11, 739–747.