Modelling user satisfaction and student learning in a spoken dialogue tutoring system with generic, tutoring, and user affect parameters

HLT-NAACL 2006 - Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Main Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 264-271

  Forbes Riley, Kate ^a   Litman, Diane J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b Learning Research and Development Ctr   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; STUDENTS;

GENERIC PARAMETERS; PREDICTIVE MODELS; SPOKEN DIALOGUE; STUDENT LEARNING; TUTORING SYSTEM; USER SATISFACTION;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 38749095547     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1220835.1220869     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. J. Ang, R. Dhillon, A. Krupski, E. Shriberg, and A. Stolcke. 2002. Prosody-based automatic detection of annoyance and frustration in human-computer dialog. In Proc. Int. Conf. Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP).
2. A. Batliner, K. Fischer, R. Huber, J. Spilker, and E. Noth. 2003. How to find trouble in communication. Speech Communication, 40:117-143.
3. K. Bhatt, M. Evens, and S. Argamon. 2004. Hedged responses and expressions of affect in human/human and human/computer tutorial interactions. In Proc. 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
4. H. Bonneau-Maynard, L. Devillers, and S. Rosset. 2000. Predictive performance of dialog systems. In Proc. Language Resources and Evaluation Conf. (LREC)).
5. M. T. H. Chi, S. A. Siler, H. Jeong, T. Yamauchi, and R. G. Hausmann. 2001. Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25:471-533.
6. S. Craig, A. Graesser, J. Sullins, and B. Gholson. 2004. Affect and learning: An exploratory look into the role of affect in learning. Journal of Educational Media, 29:241-250. (Pubitemid 39473944)
7. K. Forbes-Riley and D. Litman. 2005. Correlating student acoustic-prosodic profiles with student learning in spoken tutoring dialogues. In Proc. INTERSPEECH.
8. K. Forbes-Riley, D. Litman, S. Silliman, and J. Tetreault. 2006. Comparing synthesized versus pre-recorded tutor speech in an intelligent tutoring spoken dialogue system. In Proc. FLAIRS.
9. C.M. Lee, S. Narayanan, and R. Pieraccini. 2002. Combining acoustic and language information for emotion recognition. In Proc. ICSLP.
10. D. Litman and K. Forbes-Riley. 2004a. Annotating student emotional states in spoken tutoring dialogues. In Proc. SIGdial, pages 144-153.
11. D. Litman and K. Forbes-Riley. 2004b. Predicting student emotions in computer-human tutoring dialogues. In Proc. ACL, pages 352-359.
12. D. Litman, C. Rosé, K. Forbes-Riley, K. VanLehn, D. Bhembe, and S. Silliman. 2006. Spoken versus typed human and computer dialogue tutoring. Intnl Jnl of Artificial Intelligence in Education, To Appear.
13. S. Möller. 2005a. Parameters for quantifying the interactioin with spoken dialogue telephone services. In Proc. SIGdial.
14. S. Möller. 2005b. Towards generic quality prediction models for spoken dialogue systems - a case study. In Proc. INTERSPEECH.
15. J. D. Moore, K. Porayska-Pomsta, S. Varges, and C. Zinn. 2004. Generating tutorial feedback with affect. In Proc. FLAIRS.
16. J. Mostow and G. Aist. 2001. Evaluating tutors that listen: An overview of Project LISTEN. In K. Forbus and P. Feltovich, editors, Smart Machines in Education.
17. H. Pon-Barry, B. Clark, E. Owen Bratt, K. Schultz, and S. Peters. 2004. Evaluating the effectiveness of SCoT: a Spoken Conversational Tutor. In Proc. of ITS 2004 Workshop on Dialogue-based Intelligent Tutoring Systems: State of the Art and New Research Directions.
18. E. Shriberg, E. Wade, and P. Price. 1992. Human-machine problem solving using spoken language systems (SLS): Factors affecting performance and user satisfaction. In Proc. DARPA Speech and NL Workshop, pages 49-54.
19. K. VanLehn, P. W. Jordan, C. P. Rosé, D. Bhembe, M. Böttner, A. Gaydos, M. Makatchev, U. Pappuswamy, M. Ringenberg, A. Roque, S. Siler, R. Srivastava, and R. Wilson. 2002. The architecture of Why2-Atlas: A coach for qualitative physics essay writing. In Proc. Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
20. M. Walker, D. Litman, C. Kamm, and A. Abella. 1997. PARADISE: A framework for evaluating spoken dialogue agents. In Proc. ACL/EACL, pages 271-280.
21. M. Walker, C. Kamm, and D. Litman. 2000. Towards developing general models of usability with PARADISE. Natural Language Engineering, 6:363-377.
22. M. Walker, A. Rudnicky, R. Prasad, J. Aberdeen, E. Bratt, J. Garofolo, H. Hastie, A. Le, B. Pellom, A. Potamianos, R. Passonneau, S. Roukos, G. Sanders, S. Seneff, and D. Stallard. 2002. DARPA communicator: Cross-system results for the 2001 evaluation. In Proc. Internat. Conf. on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP).