Parameters for quantifying the interaction with spoken dialogue telephone services

Proceedings of the 6th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 166-177

  Möller, Sebastian ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDIVIDUAL SYSTEMS; INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNIONS; REGRESSION MODEL; SPOKEN DIALOGUE; SPOKEN DIALOGUE SYSTEM; SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; TELEPHONE SERVICES; TELEPHONE-BASED SPOKEN DIALOGUE SERVICES;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPEECH PROCESSING;

TELEPHONE SYSTEMS;

EID: 38749092232     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Bernsen, N.O., Dybkjær, H., Dybkjær, L. (1998). Designing interactive speech systems: From first ideas to user testing. Springer, Berlin.
2. rd IEEE Workshop on Interactive Voice Technology for Telecommunications Applications (IVTTA'96), Basking Ridge NJ, 129-134.
3. th Int. Conf. on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP'96), IEEE, Piscataway NJ, 2, 1009-1012.
4. Carletta, J. (1996). Assessing agreement of classification tasks: The kappa statistics, Computational Linguistics, 22(2), 249-254.
5. th Europ. Conf. on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech 2001 - Scandinavia), Aalborg, 3, 2087-2090.
6. th FASE Symposium, Edinburgh, 4, 1311-1320.
7. Danieli, M., Gerbino, E. (1995). Metrics for evaluating dialogue strategies in a spoken language system. In: Empirical Methods in Discourse Interpretation and Generation. Papers from the 1995 AAAI Symposium, US-Stanford CA, AAAI Press, Menlo Park CA, 34-39.
8. Fraser, N. (1997). Assessment of interactive systems. In: Handbook on Standards and Resources for Spoken Language Systems (D. Gibbon, R. Moore and R. Winski, eds.), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 564-615.
9. Gerbino, E., Baggia, P., Ciaramella, A., Rullent, C. (1993). Test and evaluation of a spoken dialogue system. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP'93), 2, 135-138.
10. th Int. Conf. on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 2000), Beijing, 4, 1-4.
11. nd Int. Conf. on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP'92), Banff, 1, 201-204.
12. Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In: Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts (P. Cole and J.L. Morgan, eds.), Academic Press, New York NY, 41-58.
13. rd Europ. Conf. on Speech Communication and Technology (Eu-rospeech'93), Berlin, 2, 1419-1422.
14. IEC Standard 60268-16 (1998). Sound system equipment - Part 16: Objective rating of speech intelligibility by speech transmission index. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva.
15. ITU-T Delayed Contribution D.030 (2005). Proposal for Parameters Describing the Performance of Speech Technology Devices, Federal Republic of Germany (Author: S. Möller), ITU-T SG12 Meeting, 18-27 January 2005, CH-Geneva.
16. ITU-T Rec. P.851 (2003). Subjective quality evaluation of telephone services based on spoken dialogue systems. International Telecomm. Union, Geneva.
17. th Int. Conf. on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP'98), Sydney, 4, 1211-1214.
18. Möller, S. (2005). Quality of telephone-based spoken dialogue systems. Springer, New York NY.
19. Möller, S., Smeele, P., Boland, H., Krebber, J. (2005). Evaluating spoken dialogue systems according to de-facto standards: A case study, submitted to Computer Speech and Language.
20. NIST Speech Recognition Scoring Toolkit (2001). Speech recognition scoring toolkit. National Institute of Standards and technology, http://www.nist.gov/speech/tools, Gaithersburg MD.
21. Polifroni, J., Hirschman, L., Seneff, S., Zue, V. (1992). Experiments in evaluating interactive spoken language systems. In: Proc. DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop, Harriman CA, 28-33.
22. Price, P.J., Hirschman, L., Shriberg, E., Wade, E. (1992). Subject-based evaluation measures for interactive spoken language systems. In: Proc. DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop, Harriman CA, 34-39.
23. th Europ. Conf. on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech 2001 - Scandinavia), Aalborg, 3, 2165-2168.
24. rd Europ. Conf. on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech'93), Berlin, 2, 1423-1426.
25. Skowronek, J. (2002). Entwicklung von Modellierungsansätzen zur Vorhersage der Dienstequalität bei der Interaktion mit einem natürlichsprachlichen Dialogsystem. Diploma thesis (unpublished), Institut für Kommunikationsakustik, Ruhr-Universität, Bochum.
26. th Europ. Conf. on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech 2001 - Scandinavia), Aalborg, 3, 2091-2094.
27. th Int. Conf. on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 2000), Beijing, 4, 740-743.
28. van Leeuwen, D., Steeneken, H. (1997). Assessment of recognition systems. In: Handbook on Standards and Resources for Spoken Language Systems (D. Gibbon, R. Moore and R. Winski, eds.), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 381-407.
29. Walker, M.A., Litman, D.J., Kamm, C.A., Abella, A. (1998). Evaluating spoken dialogue agents with PARADISE: Two case studies, Computer Speech and Language, 12(3), 317-347.
30. th Ann. Meeting of the Assoc. for Computational Linguistics, Madrid, 271-280.
31. Zue, V., Seneff, S., Glass, J.R., Polifroni, J., Pao, C., Hazen, T.J., Hetherington, L. (2000). JUPITER: A telephone-based conversational interface for weather information. IEEE Trans. Speech and Audio Processing, 8(1), 85-96. (Pubitemid 30540738)