Flexible ligand docking: A multistep strategy approach

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 1-19

  Wang, Jian ^a,b   Kollman, Peter A ^a   Kuntz, Irwin D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Docking; Molecular dynamics; Molecular mechanics

Indexed keywords

LIGAND;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; DIELECTRIC CONSTANT; DIPOLE; HYDROGEN BOND; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

ELECTROSTATICS; HYDROGEN BONDING; LIGANDS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 0033168443     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990701)36:1<1::AID-PROT1>3.0.CO;2-T     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Blaney JM, Dixon JS. Distance geometry in molecular modeling. Perspect. Drug Discov Design 1993;1:301-319.
2. Kuntz ID, Meng EC, Shoichet BK. Structure-based molecular design. Accounts Chem Res 1994;27:117-123.
3. Rosenfeld R, Vajda S, Delisi C. Flexible docking and design. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1995;24:677-700.
4. Kuntz ID, Blaney JM, Oatley SJ, Langridge RL, Ferrin TE. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interaction. J Mol Biol 1982;161:269-288.
5. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Huey R, Olson AJ. Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: parallel application of AutoDock 2.4. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1996;10:293-304.
6. Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC, Leach AR, Taylor R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J Mol Biol 1997;267:727-748.
7. Ewing T, Kuntz ID. Critical evaluation of search algorithms for automated molecular docking and database screening. J Comp Chem 1997;18:1175-1189.
8. Rarey M, Kramer B, Lengauer T, Klebe G. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. J Mol Biol 1996;261:470-489.
9. Böhm HJ. The computer program LUDI: a new method for the de novo design of enzyme inhibitors. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1992;6:61-78.
10. Welch W, Ruppert J, Jain AN. Hammerhead: fast, fully automated docking of flexible ligands to protein binding sites. Chemistry and Biology 1996;3:449-462.
11. Bohacek RS, McMartin C. Modern computational chemistry and drug discovery: structure generating programs. Curr Opin Chem Biol 1997;1:157-161.
12. Eisen MB, Wiley DC, Karplus M, Hubbard RE. HOOK - a program for finding novel molecular architectures that satisfy the chemical and steric requirements of a molecular binding site. Proteins 1994;19:199-221.
13. Weiner SJ, et al. A new force field for molecular mechanical simulation of nucleic acids and proteins. J Am Chem Soc 1984;106: 765-784.
14. Weiner SJ, Kollman PA, Nguyen DT, Case DA. An all atom force field for simulations of proteins and nucleic acids. J. Comp. Chem. 1986.7:230-252.
15. Meng EC, Gschwend DA, Blaney JM, Kuntz ID. Orientational sampling and rigid-body minimization in molecular docking. Proteins 1993;17:266-278.
16. Gschwend DA, Kuntz ID. Orientational sampling and rigid-body minimization in molecular docking revisited: on-the-fly optimization and degeneracy removal. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1996;10: 123-132.
17. Cornell WD, et al. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 1995;117:5179-5197.
18. Gasteiger J, Marsili M. Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity-a rapid access to atomic charges. Tetrahedron 1980;36:3219-3228.
19. Storer JW, Giesen DJ, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG. Class IV charge models: a new semiempirical approach in quantum chemistry. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1995;9:87-110.
20. Crippen GM. Distance geometry and conformational calculations, New York: Research Studies Press, John Wiley & Sons; 1981. p. 1-58.
21. Blaney JM, Dixon JS. Distance geometry in molecular modeling. New York:VCH Press; 1994. p 299-335.
22. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 1983;220:671-680.
23. Pearlman DA, et al. AMBER 4.1, San Francisco:University of California; 1995.
24. Singh UC, Kollman PA. An approach to computing electrostatic charges for molecules. J Comp Chem 1984;5:129-144.
25. Bayly CI, Kollman PA. A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges - the RESP model. J Phys Chem 1993;97:10269-10280.
26. Westhead DR, Clark DE, Murray CW. A comparison of heuristic search algorithms for molecular docking. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1997;11:209-228.
27. Hart WE. San Diego: University of California; 1996.
28. Klebe G, Mietzner T. A fast and efficient method to generate biologically relevant conformations. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1994;8:583-606.