Surface treatments on quartz fiber post: Influence on adhesion and flexural properties

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 375-379

  Cheleux, Nicolas ^a,b   Sharrock, Patrick ^a   Degrange, Michel ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PAUL SABATIER   (France)

^b Faculty of Odontology   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; CALIBRA; CHLOROFORM; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME & BOND NT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SELF CURE ADHESIVE; SILANE DERIVATIVE; SILICON DIOXIDE; SOLVENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PLIABILITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SHEAR STRENGTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; CHLOROFORM; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PLIABILITY; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; QUARTZ; RESIN CEMENTS; SHEAR STRENGTH; SILANES; SILICON DIOXIDE; SOLVENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 38449098695     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reducation in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod 1989;15:512-516.
2. Morfis AS. Vertical root fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990; 69:631-635.
3. Testori T, Badimo N, Castagnola M. Vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth: A clinical survey of 36 cases. J Endod 1993; 19:87-90.
4. Tarnse A. Iatrogenic vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dental Traumatol 1988; 4:190-196.
5. Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 7:43 M37.
6. Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber, and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1:153-158.
7. Hayashi M, Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Ebisu S. Fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores and crowns. Dent Mater 2006; 22:477-485.
8. Cormier CJ, Bums DR, Moon P. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. J Prosthodont 2001 ; 10:26-36.
9. Martinez-Insua A, Da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:527-532.
10. Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J, Rafter M, Billy E. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restores with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89:360-367.
11. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999; 27:275-278.
12. Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. A new concept crown-root for reconstruction: The Composipost. Chirurg Dent France 1990; 540:131-141. (In French).
13. Drummond J. In vitro evaluation of endodontic posts. Am J Dent 2000; 13:5B-8B.
14. Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials 2002; 23:2667-2682.
15. Lanza A, Aversa R, Rengo S, Apicella D, Apicella A. 3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor. Dem Mater 200521:709-715.
16. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000; 13:15B-18B.
17. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2000; 13:9B-13B.
18. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dem 1998; 80:151-157.
19. Torbjomer A, Karlsson S, Odman PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73:439-444.
20. Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Dietrich T. Survival of glass fibre reinforced composite post restorations after 2 years. An observational clinical study. J Dent 2005; 33:305-312.
21. Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16:39-44.
22. Monticelli F, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Clinical behaviour of translucent-fiber posts: A 2 year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16:593-596.
23. Tronstad L, Asbjornsenk K, Doving L. Influence of coronal restorations on the periapical health of endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dental Traumatol 2000; 16:218-221.
24. Ray HA, Trope M. Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration. Im J Endod 1995;28:12-18.
25. Le Bell AM, Tanner J, Lassila LV, Kangasniemi I, Vallittu PK. Depth of light-initiated polymerization of glass fiber-reinforced composite in a simulated root canal. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16:403-408.
26. Roberts HR, Leonard DL, Vandewall KS, Cohen ME, Charlton DG. The effect of a translucent post on resin composite depth of cure. Dent Mater 2004; 20:617-622.
27. Purton DG, Payne JA. Comparison of carbon fiber and stainless steel root canal posts. Quintessence Int 1996;27:93-97.
28. Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Bond strength of resin cement to dentin and to surface-treated posts of titanium alloy, glass fiber, and zirconia. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5:153-162.
29. Cardoso PE, Sadek FT, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Adhesion testing with the microtensile method: Effects of dental substrate and adhesive system on bond strength measurements. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4:291-297.
30. Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cements to ceramics. Dent Mater 2004;19:725-731.
31. Goracci C, Raffaelli O, Monticelli F, Balleri E, Ferrari M. The adhesion between prefabricated FRC posts and resin composite cores: Microtensile bond strength with and without post silanization. Dent Mater 2005; 21:437-444.
32. Aksommuang J, Foxton RM, Nakajima M, Tagami J. Microtensile bond strength of a dual-cure resin core material to glass and quartz fibre posts. J Dent 2004; 32:443-450.
33. Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio R, Ferrari M. Effect of temperature on the silane coupling agents when bonding core resin to quartz fiber post. Dent Mater 2006; 22:1024-1028.
34. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S. Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls: An SEM investigation. Dent Mater 2001; 17:422-429.
35. Ferrari M, Mannocci F. A 'one-bottle' adhesive system for bonding a fibre post into a root canal: An SEM evaluation of the post-resin interface. Int Endod J7000; 33:397-400.
36. Vichi A, Grandini S, Ferrari M. Clinical procedure for luting glass-fiber posts. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 353-359.
37. Balbosh A, Kern M. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95:218-223.
38. Goracci C, Sadek FT, Fabianelli A, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Oper Dent 2005;30:627-635.
39. Hedlund SO, Johansson NG, Sjögren G. Retention of prefabricated and individually cast root canal posts in vitro. Br Dent J 2003; 195:155-158.
40. Perdigão J, Geraldeli S, Lee Ik. Push-out bond strengths of tooth-colored posts bonded with different adhesive systems. Am J Dent 2004; 17:422-426.
41. Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew G. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent 1989; 17:61-67.
42. Boschian-Pest L, Cavalli G, Bertani P, Gagliani M. Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber posts: Push-out tests and SEM observations. Dent Mater 2002; 18:596-602.
43. Goracci C, Fabianelli A, Sadek FT, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. The contribution of friction to the dislocation resistance of bonded fiber posts. J Endod 2005; 31:608-612.
44. Bell AM, Lassila LV, Kangasniemi I, Vallittu PK. Bonding of fibrereinforced composite post to root canal dentin. J Dent 2005; 33:533-539.
45. Drummond JL, Sakaguchi RL, Racean DC, Wozny J, Steinberg AD. Testing mode and surface treatment effects on dentin bonding. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;32:533-541.
46. Nergiz I, Schmage P, Platzer U, McMullan-Vogel CG. Effect of different surface textures on retentive strength of tapered posts. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78:451-457.
47. Monticelli F, Toledano M, Tay FR, Cury AH, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Postsurface conditioning improves interfacial adhesion in post/core restorations. Dem Mater 2006; 22:602-609.
48. Mannocci F, Sherriff M, Watson TF. Three-point bending test of fiber posts. J Endod 2001; 27:758-761.
49. Lassila LV, Tanner J, Le Bell AM, Narva K, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mater 2004;20:29-36.
50. Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Fatigue resistance and structural characteristics of fiber posts: Three-point bending test and SEM evaluation. Dent Mater 2005; 21:75-82.