Contact Allergy: Alternatives for the 2007 North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) Standard Screening Tray

Disease-a-Month

Volumn 54, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 7-156

  Scheman, Andrew ^a   Jacob, Sharon ^a   Zirwas, Matt ^a   Warshaw, Erin ^a   Nedorost, Susan ^a   Katta, Rajani ^a   Cook, Jeremy ^a   Castanedo Tardan, Mari Paz ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHETIC AGENT; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; BACITRACIN; BENZOCAINE; BETAMETHASONE; CINCHOCAINE; CLOBETASOL PROPIONATE; CLOPREDNOL; CORTICOSTEROID; DESONIDE; DEXAMETHASONE; DIFLORASONE DIACETATE; FLUDROXYCORTIDE; FLUMETASONE; FLUNISOLIDE; FLUOROMETHOLONE; FLUPREDNIDENE; FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE; FRAGRANCE; HYDROCORTISONE; LIDOCAINE; MEDRYSONE; MEPREDNISONE; MOMETASONE FUROATE; NEOMYCIN; PREDNICARBATE; PREDNISOLONE; TRIAMCINOLONE DIACETATE; ULOBETASOL PROPIONATE; UNINDEXED DRUG;

ALLERGY TEST; ARTICLE; CONTACT ALLERGY; CONTACT DERMATITIS; DRUG HYPERSENSITIVITY; HUMAN; NORTH AMERICA; PATCH TEST; SCREENING TEST; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN EXAMINATION;

ADHESIVES; ALLERGENS; CLOTHING; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; ELASTOMERS; HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS; HUMANS; LATEX HYPERSENSITIVITY; METALS; PATCH TESTS; PERFUME; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS;

EID: 38149059953     PISSN: 00115029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2007.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (285)

1. Marks J. Allergic contact dermatitis from cosmetics: how common is it?. Cosmet Toiletries 105 (1990) 73-76
2. Adams R.M., and Maibach H.I. A five-year study of cosmetic reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol 13 (1985) 1062-1069
3. Scheper R.J., and Von Blomberg B.M.E. Cellular mechanisms in allergic contact dermatitis. In: Rycroft R.J.G., Menne T., and Frosch P.J. (Eds). Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. (ed 2) (1995), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 11-27
4. Wilkinson J.D., and Rycroft R.J.G. Contact dermatitis. In: Rook A., Wilkinson D.S., Ebling F.J.G., et al. (Eds). Textbook of Dermatology. (ed 4) (1986), Blackwell Scientific Publications, London 445-448
5. Corey G. Applying patch tests from a technician's or nurse's point of view. Am J Contact Dermatitis 4 (1993) 175-181
6. Warshaw E.M., and Nelson D. Prevalence of patch testing and methodology of dermatologists in the US: results of a cross-sectional survey. Am J Contact Dermatitis 13 (2002) 53-58
7. Jonker M.J., and Bruynzeel D.P. The outcome of an additional patch-test reading on days 6 or 7. Contact Dermatitis 42 (2000) 330-335
8. Wahlberg J.E. Patch testing. In: Rycroft R.J.G., Menne T., and Frosch P.J. (Eds). Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. (ed 2) (1995), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 250
9. Suneja T., and Belsito D.V. Comparative study of finn chambers and T.R.U.E. test methodologies in detecting the relevant allergens inducing contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 45 (2001) 836-839
10. Saripalli Y.V., Achen F., and Belsito D.V. The detection of clinically relevant contact allergens using a standard screening tray of twenty-three allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol 49 (2003) 65-69
11. Fernandez Vozmediano J.M., and Armario Hita J.C. Concordance and discordance between T.R.U.E test and Finn chamber. Contact Dermatitis 42 (2000) 182-183
12. Wenninger J.A., and McEwen G.N. CTFA Cosmetic Ingredient Handbook. (ed 2) (1992), The Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association, Washington DC
13. Rietschel R.L. Is patch testing cost effective?. J Am Acad Dermatol 21 (1989) 885-887
14. Johnson M.-L., Johnson K.G., and Engel A. Prevalence, morbidity and cost of dermatologic diseases. J Am Acad Dermatol 11 (1984) 930-936
15. Marks J.G., Belsito D.V., DeLeo V.A., et al. North American contact dermatitis group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000. Am J Contact Dermatitis 14 (2003) 59-62
16. Paulsen E., and Andersen K.E. Colophonium and compositae mix as markers of fragrance allergy: cross-reactivity between fragrance terpenes, colophonium and Compositae plant extracts. Contact Dermatitis 53 (2005) 285-291
17. Larsen W.G. How to instruct patients sensitive to fragrances. J Am Acad Dermatol 21 (1989) 880-884
18. Katsarma G., and Gawkrodger D.J. Suspected fragrance allergy requires extended patch testing to individual fragrance allergens. Contact Dermatitis 41 (1999) 193-197
19. Larsen W.G. How to test for fragrance allergy. Cutis 65 (2000) 39-41
20. Schnuch A., Uter W., Geier J., et al. Contact allergy to farnesol in 2021 consecutively patch tested patients. Results of the IVDK. Contact Dermatitis 50 (2004) 117-121
21. Jackson E.M. AAD drafts position statement to label fragrance allergens in cosmetics. Cosmet Dermatol 12 (1999) 47-51
22. Larsen W.G. Perfume dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 12 (1985) 1-9
23. Api A.M. Only Peru Balsam extracts or distillates are used in perfumery. Contact Dermatitis 54 (2006) 179
24. Larsen W., Nakayama H., Lindberg M., et al. Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation (part I). Am J Contact Dermatitis 7 (1996) 77-83
25. Larsen W., Nakayama H., Fischer T., et al. Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation (part III). Contact Dermatitis 46 (2002) 141-144
26. Frosch P.J., Pirker C., Rastogi S.C., et al. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 52 (2005) 207-215
27. Larsen W.G. Perfume dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 113 (1977) 623-626
28. Pratt M.D., Belsito D.V., DeLeo V.A., et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period. Dermatitis 15 4 (2004) 176-183
29. Scheinman P.L. Allergic contact dermatitis to fragrance: a review. Am J Contact Dermat 7 2 (1996) 65-76
30. De Groot A.C., and Frosch P.J. Adverse reactions to fragrances. A clinical review. Contact Dermatitis 36 2 (1997) 57-86
31. Muller J., and Brauer H. The H&R Book of Perfume (1992), Verlagsgesellschaft Gloss & Co, Hamburg
32. Larsen W.G. Perfume dermatits. J Am Acad Dermatol 12 (1985) 1-9
33. Bauer K., Garbe D., and Surburg H. Common Fragrance and Flavor Materials: Preparation, Properties and Uses (1990), VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim
34. Thune P., and Sandberg M. Allergy to lichen and compositae compounds n perfumes. Investigations on the sensitizing, toxic and mutagenic potential. Acta Derm Venereol 134 suppl (1987) 87-89
35. Hjorth N. Eczematous allergy to balsams. Acta Dermatol Venereol 41 suppl 46 (1961) 1216
36. Krob H.A., Fleischer Jr. R., D'Agostino Jr. A.B., et al. Prevalence and relevance of contact dermatitis allergens: a meta analysis of 15 years of published T.R.U.E. test data. J Am Acad Dermatol 51 3 (2004) 349-353
37. Rietschel R.L., and Fowler Jr. J.F. Fisher's Contact Dermatitis. (ed 5) (2001), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA
38. Salam T.N., and Fowler Jr. J.F. Balsam-related systemic contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 45 3 (2001) 377-381
39. Srivastava D., Chang Y.T., Kumar S., et al. Identification of the constituents of balsam of Peru in tomatoes. Dermatitis 16 (2005) 91-100
40. Li M., and Gow E. Benzyl alcohol allergy. Aus J Derm 36 (1995) 219-220
41. Curry E.J., and Warshaw E.M. Benzyl alcohol allergy: importance of patch testing with personal products. Dermatitis 16 (2005) 203-208
42. Simpson E.L., Law S.V., and Storrs F.J. Prevalence of botanical extract allergy in patients with contact dermatitis. Dermatitis 15 (2004) 67-72
43. Cockayne S.E., and Gawkrodger D.J. Occupational contact dermatitis in an aromatherapist. Contact Dermatitis 37 (1997) 306
44. Bhushan M., and Beck M.H. Allergic contact dermatitis from tea tree oil in a wart paint. Contact Dermatitis 36 (1997) 117-118
45. Crawford G.H., Sciacca J.R., and James W.D. Tea tree oil: cutaneous effects of the extracted oil of Melaleuca alternifolia. Dermatitis 15 (2004) 59-66
46. Knight T.E., and Hausen B.M. Melaleuca oil (tea tree oil) dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 30 (1994) 423-427
47. Saedi N., and Crawford G.H. Botanical briefs: ylang-ylang oil - extracts from the tree Cananga odorata. Cutis 77 (2006) 149-150
48. Ichihashi K., Soga F., Katoh N., et al. Allergic contact cheilitis from pentaeryritol rosinate in a lipstick. Contact Dermatitis 49 (2003) 213-222
49. Hausen B.M. A 6-year experience with compositae mix. Am J Contact Dermat 7 2 (1996) 94-99
50. http://www.dormer.ca/Phy_Pages/Mixes.aspx Accessed July 26, 2007
51. O'Hara M., Kiefer D., Farrell K., et al. A review of 12 commonly used medicinal herbs. Arch Fam Med 7 (1998) 523-536
52. Paulsen E. Contact sensitization from compositae-containing herbal remedies and cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis 47 (2002) 189-198
53. Hausen B.M. Arnica Allergy. Hautarzt 31 (1980) 10-17
54. Anon. Final report on the safety assessment of Arnica Montana extract and Arnica Montana. Int J Toxicol 20 (2001) 246-249
55. Isely D. One Hundred and One Botanists (1994), Iowa State University Press 10-13
56. Gunther R.T. The Greek Herbal of Dioscorides (1933), Oxford University Press, Oxford
57. http://stevenfoster.com/education/monograph/feverfew.html
58. Johnson E.S., Kadam N.P., Hylands D.M., et al. Efficacy of feverfew as prophylactic treatment of migraine. Br Med J 291 (1985) 569-573
59. Vogler B., Pittler M.H., and Ernst E. Feverfew as a preventative treatment for migraine: a systemic review. Cephalalgia 18 10 (1998) 704-708
60. Evan R., and Taylor F. Natural or alternative medications for migraine prevention. Headache 46 6 (2006) 1012-1018
61. Mittra S., Datta A., Singh K., et al. 5-hydroxytyptamine-inhibiting property of feverfew: role of parthenolide content. Acta Pharmacol Sin 21 12 (2000) 1106-1114
62. Anon. Final report on the safety assessment of yarrow (Achillea millefolium) extract. Int J Toxicol 20 (2001) 79-84
63. Hartford O., and Zug K.A. Tea tree oil. Cutis 76 3 (2005) 178-180
64. Jacobs M.R., and Hornfeldt C.S. Melaleuca oil poisoning. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 32 4 (1994) 461-464
65. Giusti F., Miglietta R., Pepe P., et al. Sensitization to propolis in 1225 children undergoing patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 51 5-6 (2004) 255-258
66. Walgrave S.E., Warshaw E.M., and Glesne L.A. Allergic contact dermatitis from propolis. Dermatitis 16 4 (2005) 209-215
67. Jackson E.M. Masking fragrances revisited. Am J Contact Dermatitis 9 (1997) 193-195
68. Scheinman P.L. Is it really fragrance-free?. Am J Contact Dermatitis 8 (1997) 239-242
69. Scheinman P.L. Exposing covert fragrance chemicals. Am J Contact Dermatitis 12 (2001) 225-228
70. Brancaccio R.R. What's new in contact dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermatitis 4 (1993) 55-57
71. Cashman A.L., and Warshaw E.M. Parabens: a review of epidemiology, structure, allergenicity, and hormonal properties. Dermatitis 16 (2005) 57-66
72. Fisher A.A. Esoteric contact dermatitis. Part I: the paraben paradox. Cutis 57 (1996) 65-66
73. Fisher A.A. Esoteric contact dermatitis. Part II: the paraben paradox. Cutis 57 (1996) 135-138
74. Formaldehyde council. Formaldehyde: a brief history and its contribution to society and the U.S. economy. http://www.formaldehyde.org
75. Baker R.R. The generation of formaldehyde in cigarettes: overview and recent experiments. Food Chem Toxicol 44 11 (2006) 1799-1822
76. Sasseville D. Hypersensitivity to preservatives. Dermatol Ther 17 3 (2004) 251-263
77. Herbert C., and Rietchel R.L. Formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers: how much avoidance of cross-reacting agents is required?. Contact Dermatitis 50 (2004) 371-373
78. Bardana Jr. E.J., and Montanaro A. Formaldehyde: an analysis of its respiratory, cutaneous, and immunologic effects. Ann Allergy 66 6 (1991) 441-452
79. Trocho C., Pardo R., Rafecas I., et al. Formaldehyde derived from dietary aspartame binds to tissue components in vivo. Life Sci 63 5 (1998) 337-349
80. Jacob S.E., and Stechschulte S. Formaldehyde, aspartame and migraines: a possible connection. Dermatitis 19 3 (2008) in press
81. Hill A.M., and Belsito D.V. Systemic contact dermatitis of the eyelids caused by formaldehyde derived from aspartame?. Contact Dermatitis 49 5 (2003) 258-259
82. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Medical Management Guidelines (MMGs) for Formaldehyde (HCHO). http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/MHMI/mmg111.html
83. Murray T.G., Burton T.C., Rajani C., et al. Methanol poisoning. A rodent model with structural and functional evidence for retinal involvement. Arch Ophthalmol 109 (1991) 1012-1016
84. Food and Environmental Hygiene Department. The Government of Hong Kung special administration region. http://www.fehd.gov.hk/safefood/report/formaldehyde/formaldehyde.html
85. Food Standards Agency. Analysis of formaldehyde in shiitake mushrooms (2004). http://www.food.gov.uk/science/reasearch/researchinfo/foodcomponentsresearch/phytoestrogenresearch/t05-t06programme/t05t06projectlist/t05027project/
86. Marks J.G., Moss J.N., Parno J.R., et al. Methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (Kathon CG) biocide: second united states multicenter study of human skin sensitization. Am J Contact Dermatitis 4 (1993) 87-89
87. Rietschel R.L., Nethercott J.R., Emmett E.A., et al. Methylchloroisothiazolinone-methylisothiazolinone reactions in patients screened for vehicle and preservative hypersensitivity. J Am Acad Dermatol 22 (1990) 734-738
88. De Groot A.C., van Ginkel C.J.W., and Weijland J.W. Methyldibromoglutaronitrile (Euxyl K 400): an important "new" allergen in cosmetics. J Am Acad Dermatol 35 (1996) 743-747
89. Zachariae C., Johansen J.D., Rastogi S.C., et al. Allergic contact dermatitis from methyldibromo glutaronitrile: clinical cases from 2003. Contact Dermatitis 52 (2005) 6-8
90. Schnuch A., Geier J., Brasch J., et al. The preservative iodopropynyl butylcarbamate: frequency of allergic reactions and diagnostic considerations. Contact Dermatitis 46 (2002) 153-156
91. Bryld L.E., Agner T., and Menne T. Allergic contact dermatitis from 3-iodo-2-propynyl-butylcarbamate (IPBC): an update. Contact Dermatitis 44 (2001) 276-278
92. Badreshia S., and Marks J.G. Iodopropynyl butylcarbamate. Am J Contact Dermatitis 13 (2002) 77-79
93. Fowler J.F., Fowler L.M., and Hunter J.E. Allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine may be due to amidoamine: a patch test and product use test study. Contact Dermatitis 37 (1997) 276-281
94. Expert Panel of the American College of Toxicology. Final report on the safety assessment of cocamidopropyl betaine. J Am Coll Toxicol 10 (1991) 33-40
95. Fowler J.F., Zug K.M., Taylor J.S., et al. Allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine and amidoamine in North America. Dermatitis 15 (2004) 5-6
96. Armstrong D.K.B., Smith H.R., Ross J.S., et al. Sensitization to cocamidopropylbetaine: an 8-year review. Contact Dermatitis 40 (1999) 335-336
97. Pigatto P.D., Bigardi A.S., and Cusano F. Contact dermatitis to cocamidopropylbetaine is caused by residual amines: relevance, clinical characteristics, and review of the literature. Am J Contact Dermatitis 6 (1995) 13-16
98. Moreau L., and Sasseville D. Allergic contact dermatitis from cocamidopropyl betaine, cocamidoamine, 3-(dimethylamino)propylamine, and oleamidopropyl dimethylamine: co-reactions or cross-reactions?. Dermatitis 15 (2004) 146-149
99. Brey N.L., and Fowler J.F. Relevance of positive patch-test reactions to cocamidopropyl betaine and amidoamine. Dermatitis 15 (2004) 7-9
100. Jackson E.M. Propylene glycol: irritant, sensitizer or neither?. Cosmet Dermatol 8 (1995) 43-45
101. Scheman A.J., and Severson D.L. Pocket Guide to Meditations Used in Dermatology. (ed 8) (2003), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA
102. Lu R., and Katta R. Case reports: iatrogenic contact dermatitis due to propylene glycol. J Drugs Dermatol 4 (2005) 98-101
103. Diegenant C., Constandt L., and Goossens A. Allergic contact dermatitis due to 1,3- butylene glycol. Contact Dermatitis 43 (2000) 234-235
104. Sugiura M., and Hayakawa R. Contact dermatitis due to 1,3-butylene glycol. Contact Dermatitis 37 (1997) 90
105. Johansen J.D., Rastogi S.C., and Jemec G.B.E. Dipropylene glycol allergy: a hidden cause of perfume contact dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermatitis 5 (1994) 98-101
106. Oleffe J.D., Blondeel A., and Broschmans L. Patch testing with lanolin. Contact Dermatitis 4 (1978) 233
107. Cronin E. Lanolin dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 78 (1966) 617
108. Matthieu L., and Dockx P. Discrepancy in patch test results with wool wax alcohols and Amerchol L-101. Contact Dermatitis 36 (1997) 150-151
109. Scheuer E., and Warshaw E. Sunscreen allergy: a review epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and responsible allergens. Dermatitis 17 (2006) 3-11
110. Schauder S., and Ippen H. Contact and photocontact sensitivity to sunscreens. Contact Dermatitis 37 (1997) 221-232
111. Nedorost S.T. Facial erythema as a result of benzophenone allergy. J Am Acad Dermatol 49s (2003) 5259-5261
112. Alanko K., Jolanki R., Estlander T., et al. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from benzophenone-4 in hair-care products. Contact Dermatitis 44 (2001) 188
113. Matsumura T., Nakada T., and Lijima M. Widespread contact dermatitis from tocopherol acetate. Contact Dermatitis 51 (2004) 211-212
114. Harris B.D., and Taylor J.S. Contact allergy to vitamin E capsules: false-negative patch tests to vitamin E?. Contact Dermatitis 36 (1997) 273
115. Fowler J.F. Allergy to cocamide DEA. Am J Contact Dermatitis 9 (1998) 40-41
116. Dejobert Y., Delaporte E., Piette F., et al. Eyelid dermatitis with positive patch test to coconut diethanolamide. Contact Dermatitis 52 (2005) 173
117. Tosti A., Guerra L., Vincenzi C., et al. Contact sensitization caused by toluene sulfonamide-formaldehyde resin in women who use nail cosmetics. Am J Contact Dermatitis 4 (1993) 150-153
118. Sainio E.L., Engstrom K., Henriks-Eckerman M., et al. Allergenic ingredients in nail polishes. Contact Dermatitis 37 (1997) 155-162
119. Liden C., Berg M., Farm G., et al. Nail varnish allergy with far-reaching consequences. Br J Dermatol 128 (1993) 57
120. DeLeo V.A. P-phenylenediamine. Dermatitis 17 (2006) 53-55
121. Scheman A.J. New trends in hair products: an update for dermatologists. Cosmet Dermatol 11 (1998) 17-22
122. Uter W., Lessmann H., Geier J., et al. Contact allergy to ingredients of hair cosmetics in female hairdressers and clients: an 8-year analysis of IVDK data. Contact Dermatitis 49 (2003) 236-240
123. Katugampola R.P., Statham B.N., English J.S.C., et al. A multicentre review of the hairdressing allergens tested in the UK. Contact Dermatitis 53 (2005) 130-132
124. Pratt M.D., Belsito D.V., DeLeo V.A., et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period. Dermatitis 15 (2004) 176-183
125. Rietschel R.L., Fowler J.F., and Fisher A.A. Fisher's Contact Dermatitis. (ed 5) (2001), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA 167-202
126. Berthelot C., and Zirwas M.J. Allergic contact dermatitis to chloroxylenol. Dermatitis 17 3 (2006) 156-159
127. Isaksson M., and Bruze M. Corticosteroids. Dermatitis 16 1 (2005) 3-5
128. Jacob S.E., and Steele T. Corticosteroid classes: a quick reference guide including patch test substances and cross-reactivity. J Am Acad Dermatol 54 4 (2006) 723-727
129. Scheman A.J., and Severson D.L. Pocket Guide to Medications Used in Dermatology. (ed 8) (2003), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA
130. Ash S., and Scheman A.J. Systemic contact dermatitis to hydroxyzine. Am J Contact Dermat 8 1 (1997) 2-5
131. Guin J.D., Hamann C., and Sullivan K.M. Natural and synthetic rubber. In: Adams R.M. (Ed). Occupational Skin Disease. (ed 3) (1999), Saunders, Philadelphia, PA 501-551
132. Rietschel R.L., Fowler J.F., and Fisher A.A. Allergy to rubber. Fisher's Contact Dermatitis. (ed 5) (2001), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA 533-560
133. Ohm R.F. Rubber chemicals. In: Kirk R.E., and Othmer D.F. (Eds). Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (2000), Wiley, New York, NY. http://www.lib.umn.edu/get/kirk Available at: http://www.lib.umn.edu/get/kirk; http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/kirk/kirk_search_fs.html
134. Conde-Salazar L., Del-Rio E., Guimaraens D., et al. Type IV allergy to rubber additives: a 10-year study of 686 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 29 (1993) 176-180
135. Warshaw E.M., Rietschel R.L., Sasserville D., et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results 2003-2004 study period. Dermatitis (2008) in press
136. Van Ketel W.G. Thiuram-mix. Contact Dermatitis 2 (1976) 232-233
137. Marks J.G., Elsner P., and DeLeo V.A. Contact & Occupational Dermatology. (ed 3) (2002), Mosby, St. Louis, MO 65-139
138. Bergendorff O., Persson C., and Hansson C. High-performance liquid chromatography analysis of rubber allergens in protective gloves used in health care. Contact Dermatitis 55 (2006) 210-215
139. Depree G.J., Bledsoe T.A., and Siegel P.D. Survey of sulfur-containing rubber accelerator levels in latex and nitrile exam gloves. Contact Dermatitis 53 (2005) 107-113
140. Geier J., Lessmann H., Uter W., et al. Occupational rubber glove allergy: results of the information network of departments of dermatology (IVDK), 1995-2001. Contact Dermatitis 48 (2003) 39-44
141. Downs A.M., and Sansom J.E. Severe contact allergy to footwear responding to handmade shoes. Contact Dermatitis 40 (1999) 218
142. Mathias C.G., and Maibach H.I. Polyvinyl chloride work boots in the management of shoe dermatitis in industrial workers. Contact Dermatitis 5 (1979) 249-250
143. Scheman A., and Osburn A. Use of a breathable glove liner for prevention of delayed hypersensitivity to rubber accelerators. J Occup Environ Med 39 (1997) 605
144. Rietschel R.L., and Fowler J.F. Textile and shoe dermatitis. In: Rietschel R.L., and Fowler J.F. (Eds). Fisher's Contact Dermatitis. (ed 5) (2001), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA 279-319
145. Fisher A.A. Condom dermatitis in either partner. Cutis 39 (1987) 281 284-5
146. Cronin E. Rubber. Contact Dermatitis (1980), Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh 714-770
147. Bolhaar S.T., and van Ginkel C.J. Allergy to rubber additives in orthopedic braces. Contact Dermatitis 42 (2000) 288-289
148. Adams A.K., and Warshaw E.M. Allergic contact dermatitis from mercapto compounds. Dermatitis 17 (2006) 56-70
149. Mitchell J.C., Clendenning W.E., Cronin E., et al. Patch testing with mercaptobenzothiazole and mercapto-mix. Contact Dermatitis 2 (1976) 123
150. Fregert S. Cross-sensitivity pattern of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT). Contact Dermatitis 49 (1976) 45
151. Hansson C., and Agrup G. Stability of the mercaptobenzothiazole compounds. Contact Dermatitis 28 (1993) 29-34
152. Warshaw E.M., Schram S.E., Rietschel R.L., et al. Shoe allergens: review of the literature and retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2001-2004. Dermatitis 18 (2007) 191-202
153. Fisher A.A. Allergic contact spandex dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 96 (1967) 607-608
154. Kanerva L., Estlander T., and Jolanki R. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by thiourea compounds. Contact Dermatitis 31 (1994) 242-248
155. Warshaw E.M., Cook J., Belsito D.V., et al. Positive patch test reactions to mixed dialkyl thioureas: analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1994-2004. Dermatitis (2008) in press
156. McCleskey P.E., and Swerlick R.A. Clinical review: thioureas and allergic contact dermatitis. Cutis 68 (2001) 387-396
157. Woo D.K., Militello G., and James W.D. Neoprene. Dermatitis 15 (2004) 206-209
158. Adams R.M. Contact allergic dermatitis due to diethylthiourea in a wetsuit. Contact Dermatitis 8 (1982) 277-278
159. Kerre S., Devos L., Verhoeve L., et al. Contact allergy to diethylthiourea in a wet suit. Contact Dermatitis 35 (1996) 176-178
160. Balestrero S., Cozzani E., Ghigliotti G., et al. Allergic contact dermatitis from a wet suit. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 13 (1999) 228-229
161. Gudi V.S., White M.I., and Ormerod A.D. Allergic contact dermatitis from dibutylthiourea in a wetsuit. Dermatitis 15 (2004) 55-56
162. Romaguera C., Grimalt F., Vilaplana J., et al. Contact dermatitis to thioureas. Contact Dermatitis 18 (1988) 175-176
163. Fowler J.F., and Clark L.M. Contact allergy to a rubber knee brace. Am J Contact Dermat 2 (1991) 211-212
164. Bolhaar S.T., and van Ginkel C.J. Allergy to rubber additives in orthopedic braces. Contact Dermatitis 42 (2000) 248
165. Haapasaari K.M., and Niinimaki A. Vesicular palmar eczema from the neoprene tongue of an ankle support. Contact Dermatitis 42 (2000) 248
166. Bergendorff O., Persson C.M., and Hansson C. HPLC analysis of alkyl thioureas in an orthopaedic brace and patch testing with pure ethylbutylthiourea. Contact Dermatitis 51 (2004) 273-277
167. Sakata S., Cahill J., and Nixon R. Allergic contact dermatitis to thiourea in a neoprene knee brace. Austr J Dermatol 47 (2006) 67-69
168. White W.G., and Vickers H.R. Diethylthiourea as a cause of dermatitis in a car factory. Br J Ind Med 27 (1970) 167-169
169. Johnson R.C., and Elston D.M. Wrist dermatitis: contact allergy to neoprene in a keyboard wrist rest. Am J Contact Dermat 8 (1997) 172-174
170. Bassiri S., and Cohen D.E. Bilateral palmar dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermat 13 (2002) 75-76
171. Reynaerts A., Bruze M., Erikstam U., et al. Allergic contact dermatitis from a medical device, followed by depigmentation. Contact Dermatitis 39 (1998) 204-205
172. Scalf L.A., and Fowler Jr. J.F. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by dialkyl thioureas in a patient with sleep apnea. Am J Contact Dermat 10 (1999) 169-171
173. Azenha A., Brandão F.M., Marques M.S.J., et al. Thiourea contact sensitivity in Portugal. In: Frosch P.J., Dooms-Goossens A., Lachapelle J.M., et al. (Eds). Current Topics in Contact Dermatitis (1989), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 294-297
174. Alomar A., and Vilaltella I. Contact dermatitis to dibutylthiourea in swimming goggles. Contact Dermatitis 13 (1985) 348-349
175. Foussereau J., Muslmani M., Cavelier C., et al. Contact allergy to safety shoes. Contact Dermatitis 14 (1986) 233-236
176. Romaguera C., Grimalt F., and Vilaplana J. Eczematous and purpuric allergic contact dermatitis from boots. Contact Dermatitis 21 (1989) 269
177. Kanerva L., Jolanki R., Plosila M., et al. Contact dermatitis from dibutylthiourea. Report of a case with fine structural observations of epicutaneous testing with dibutylthiourea. Contact Dermatitis 10 (1984) 158-162
178. Kanerva L., Estlander T., Alanko K., et al. Occupational airborne allergic contact dermatitis from dibutylthiourea. Contact Dermatitis 38 (1998) 347-348
179. Andersen K.E. Diethylthiourea contact dermatitis from an acidic detergent. Contact Dermatitis 9 (1983) 146
180. Schmid-Grendelmeier P., and Elsner P. Contact dermatitis due to occupational dibutylthiourea exposure: a case of phonecard dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 32 (1995) 308-309
181. Thomas R., Dexter M., and King R.E. Antioxidants, polymers. In: Kirk R.E., and Othmer D.F. (Eds). Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (2000), Wiley, New York, NY. http://www.lib.umn.edu/get/kirk Available at: http://www.lib.umn.edu/get/kirk; http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/kirk/kirk_search_fs.html
182. Menne T., White I.R., Bruynzeel D.P., et al. Patch test reactivity to the PPD-black-rubber-mix (industrial rubber chemicals) and individual ingredients. Contact Dermatitis 26 (1992) 354
183. Kuijpers D.I., Hillen F., and Frank J.A. Occupational peri-ocular contact dermatitis due to sensitization against black rubber components of a microscope. Contact Dermatitis 55 (2006) 77-80
184. Conde-Salazar L., Valks R., Acebes C.G., et al. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from antioxidant amines in a dental technician. Dermatitis 15 (2004) 197-200
185. Warshaw E.M. Latex allergy. Skin Med 2 (2003) 359-366
186. Taylor J.S., and Erkek E. Latex allergy: diagnosis and management. Dermatol Ther 17 (2004) 289-301
187. Cohen D.E., Scheman A., Stewart L., et al. American academy of dermatology's position paper on latex allergy. J Am Acad Dermatol 39 (1998) 98-106
188. Cullinan P., Brown R., Field A., et al. Latex allergy. A position paper of the British society of allergy and clinical immunology. Clin Exp Allergy 33 (2003) 1484-1499
189. Björkner B. Plastic materials. In: Adams R.M. (Ed). Occupational Skin Disease. (ed 3) (1999), Saunders, Philadelphia, PA 434-462
190. Emmett E.A. Allergic contact dermatitis in polyurethane plastic moulders. J Occup Med 18 (1976) 802-804
191. Estlander T., Keskinen H., Jolanki R., et al. Occupational dermatitis from exposure to polyurethane chemicals. Contact Dermatitis 27 (1992) 161-165
192. Fregert S., Trulson L., and Zimerson E. Contact allergic reactions to diphenylthiourea and phenylisothiocyanate in PVC adhesive tape. Contact Dermatitis 8 (1982) 38-42
193. Rodgers B., Waddell W.H., Solis S., et al. Rubber compounding. In: Kirk R.E., and Othmer D.F. (Eds). Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (2000), Wiley, New York, NY. http://www.lib.umn.edu/get/kirk Available at: http://www.lib.umn.edu/get/kirk; http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/kirk/kirk_search_fs.html
194. Hansen M.B., Johansen J.D., and Menne T. Chromium allergy: significance of both Cr(III) and Cr(VI). Contact Dermatitis 49 4 (2003) 206-212
195. Burrows D. Chromium. In: Kanerva L., Elsner P., Wahlberg J.E., et al. (Eds). Handbook of Occupational Dermatology (2000), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 535-539
196. Contact Dermatitis and other reactions to metals. In: Rietschel R.L., and Fowler J.F. (Eds). Fisher's Contact Dermatitis. (ed 5) (2001), Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA 620
197. Kang E.K., Lee S., Park J.H., et al. Determination of hexavalent chromium in cosmetic products by ion chromatography and postcolumn derivatization. Contact Dermatitis 54 5 (2006) 244-248
198. Rutala W.A., and Weber D.J. Infection control: the role of disinfection and sterilization. J Hosp Infect 43 suppl (1999) S43-S55
199. http://www.ldsleather.com/lether/tutorial.html Accessed March 2007
200. Jordan S.L., Stowers M.F., Trawick E.G., et al. Glutaraldehyde permeation: choosing the proper glove. Am J Infect Control 24 2 (1996) 67-69
201. Ramirez de Knott H.M., McCormick T.S., Kalka K., et al. Cutaneous hypersensitivity to Malassezia sympodialis and dust mite in adult atopic dermatitis with a textile pattern. Contact Dermatitis 54 2 (2006) 92-99
202. Herve-Bazin B., Foussereau J., and Cavelier C. [Allergic eczema due to textile pigment-supports] [Article in French].). Berufsdermatosen 25 3 (1977) 113-117
203. Schindler W.D., and Hauser P.J. Chemical Finishing of Textiles (2004), Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Cambridge 52
204. Scheman A.J., Carroll P.A., Brown K.H., et al. Formaldehyde-related textile allergy: an update. Contact Dermatitis 38 6 (1998) 332-336
205. Lazarov A. Textile dermatitis in patients with contact sensitization in Israel. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 18 (2004) 531-537
206. Carlson R.M., Smith M.C., and Nedorost S.T. Diagnosis and treatment of dermatitis due to formaldehyde resins in clothing. Dermatitis 15 (2004) 169-175 [Published erratum in Dermatitis 2005;16:106.]
207. Isaksson M., Zimerson E., and Bruze M. Occupational dermatoses in composite production. J Occup Environ Med 41 4 (1999) 261-266 Apr
208. Hatch K. Textile dyes as allergic contact allergens. Curr Probl Dermatol 31 (2003) 139-155
209. Pratt M., and Taraska V. Disperse blue dyes 106 and 124 are common causes of textile dermatitis and should serve as screening allergens for this condition. Am J Contact Dermatitis 11 1 (2000) 30-41
210. Matulich J., and Sullivan J. A temporary henna tattoo causing hair and clothing dye allergy. Contact Dermatitis 53 1 (2005) 33-36
211. Komericki P., Aberer W., Arbab E., et al. Pigmented purpuric contact dermatitis from Disperse Blue 106 and 124 dyes. J Am Acad Dermatol 45 3 (2001) 456-458
212. Shah S.A., and Ormerod A.D. Pigmented purpuric clothing dermatitis due to disperse dyes. Contact Dermatitis 43 6 (2000) 360 Dec
213. van der Veen J.P., Neering H., de Haan P., et al. Pigmented purpuric clothing dermatitis due to Disperse Blue 85. Contact Dermatitis 19 3 (1988) 222-223
214. Hatch K.L., Motschi H., and Maibach H.I. Disperse dyes in fabrics of patients patch-test-positive to disperse dyes. Am J Contact Dermatitis 14 4 (2003) 205-212
215. Cohen D., Hatch K., Maibach H., et al. Clothes make the (wo)man: diagnosis and management of clothing dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermatitis 12 (2001) 229
216. Downs A.M., and Sansom J.E. Colophony allergy: a review. Contact Dermatitis 41 (1999) 305-310
217. Hausen B.M., Kreuger A., Mohnert J., et al. Contact allergy due to colophony (III). Sensitizing potency of resin acids and some related products. Contact Dermatitis 20 (1989) 41-50
218. Goossens A., Arminguad P., Avenel-Audran M., et al. An epidemic of allergic contact dermatitis due to epilating products. Contact Dermatitis 47 (2002) 67-70
219. Gafvert E., Bordalo O., and Karlberg A.T. Patch testing with allergens from modified rosin (colophony) discloses additional cases of contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 35 (1996) 290-298
220. Salim A., and Shaw S. Recommendation to include ester gum resin when patch testing patients with leg ulcers. Contact Dermatitis 44 (2001) 34-60
221. Rietschel R.L., and Fowler J.F. Fisher's Contact Dermatitis. (ed 5) (2001), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA 312
222. Pereira T.M., Flour M., and Goossens A. Allergic contact dermatitis from modified colophonium in wound dressings. Contact Dermatitis 56 (2007) 5-9
223. Rietschel R.L., and Fowler J.F. Fisher's Contact Dermatitis. (ed 5) (2001), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA 337
224. Machet L., Couhe C., Perrinaud A., et al. A high prevalence of sensitization still persists in leg ulcer patients: a retrospective series of 106 patients tested between 2001 and 2002 and a meta-analysis of 1975-2003 data. Br J Dermatol 150 (2004) 929-935
225. Sasseville D., Tennstedt D., and Lachapelle J.M. Allergic contact dermatitis from hydrocolloid dressings. Am J Contact Dermatitis 8 (1997) 236-238
226. Downs A.M.R., Sharp L.A., and Sansom J.A. Penterythritol-esterified gum rosin as a sensitizer in Granuflex hydrocolloid dressing. Contact Dermatitis 41 (1999) 162
227. Lachapelle J.M., and Leroy B. Allergic contact dermatitis to colophony included in the formulation of flexible collodion BP, the vehicle of a salicylic and lactic acid wart paint. Dermatol Clin 8 (1990) 143-146
228. Quain R.D., Militello G., and Crawford G.H. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by colophony in an epilating product. Dermatitis 18 (2007) 96-98
229. Karlberg A.T., and Magnusson K. Rosin components identified in diapers. Contact Dermatitis 34 (1996) 176-180
230. Sainio E.L., Henriks-Eckerman M.L., and Kanerva L. Colophony, formaldehyde, and mercury in mascaras. Contact Dermatitis 34 (1996) 364-365
231. Rademaker M. Allergic contact dermatitis to a sanitary pad. Austr J Dermatol 45 (2004) 234-235
232. Cockayne S.E., Murphy R., and Gawkrodger D.J. Occupational contact dermatitis from colophonium in a dental technician. Contact Dermatitis 44 (2001) 60-61
233. Karlberg A.T., Gafvert E., and Liden C. Environmentally friendly paper may increase the risk of hand eczema in rosin-sensitive persons. J Am Acad Dermatol 33 (1995) 427-432
234. Ozaki A., Ooshima T., and Mori Y. Migration of dehydroabietic and abietic acids from paper and paperboard food packaging into food-simulating solvents and Tenax TA. Food Addit Contam 23 (2006) 854-860
235. Karlberg A.-T., and Lidén C. Colophony (rosin) in newspaper may contribute to hand eczema. Br J Dermatol 126 (1992) 161-165
236. Marks J.G., and Deleo V.A. Contact and Occupational Dermatology. (ed 2) (1997), Mosby-Year Book, St. Louis, MO 83
237. Taylor J.S., Bergfeld W.F., Guin J.D., et al. Contact dermatitis to knee patch adhesive in boys' jeans: a nonoccupational cause of epoxy resin sensitivity. Cleve Clin Q 50 (1983) 123
238. Marks J.G., and Deleo V.A. Contact and Occupational Dermatology. (ed 2) (1997), Mosby-Year Book, St. Louis, MO 85
239. Pfeiffer P., and Rosenbauer E.U. Residual methyl methacrylate monomer, water sorption, and water solubility of hypoallergenic denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent 92 (2004) 72-78
240. Rietschel R.L., and Fowler J.F. Fisher's Contact Dermatitis. (ed 5) (2001), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA 456
241. Sood A., and Taylor J.S. Acrylic reactions: a review of 56 cases. Contact Dermatitis 48 (2003) 346-347
242. Darre E., Vedel P., and Jensen J.S. Skin protection against methylmethacrylate. Acta Orthop Scand 58 (1987) 236-238
243. Edwards T.B., Habetz S., and D'Ambrosia R.D. The effect of polymethyl methacrylate on latex-free surgical gloves. J Arthroplasty 16 (2001) 541-542
244. Zirwas M.J. Acrylates. Dermatitis 17 (2006) 109-110
245. Goon A.T., Isaksson M., Zimerson E., et al. Contact allergy to (meth)acrylates in the dental series in southern Sweden: simultaneous positive patch test reaction patterns and possible screening allergens. Contact Dermatitis 55 (2006) 219-226
246. Rofagha R., and Zirwas M.J. Painful edema of the cheek. Dermatitis 16 (2005) 145-146
247. Henriks-Eckerman M.L., Suuronen K., Jolanki R., et al. Methacrylates in dental restorative materials. Contact Dermatitis 50 (2004) 233-237
248. Peutzfeldt A. Resin composites in dentistry: the monomer systems. Eur J Oral Sci 105 (1997) 97-116
249. Lygre H., Hol P.J., Solheim E., et al. Organic leachables from polymer-based dental filling materials. Eur J Oral Sci 107 (1999) 378-383
250. Segerstrom S., Meric G., Knarvang T., et al. Evaluation of two matrix materials intended for fiber-reinforced polymers. Eur J Oral Sci 113 (2005) 422-428
251. Koutis D., and Freeman S. Allergic contact stomatitis caused by acrylic monomer in a denture. Austr J Dermatol 42 (2001) 203-206
252. Mowad C.M., and Ferringer T. Allergic contact dermatitis from acrylates in artificial nails. Dermatitis 15 (2004) 51-53
253. Kanerva L. Ethyl cyanoacrylate does not cross-react with methacrylates and acrylates. Am J Contact Dermatitis 8 (1997) 54
254. Guin J., Baas K., and Nelson-Adesokan P. Contact sensitization to cyanoacrylate adhesive as a cause of severe onychodystrophy. Int J Dermatol 37 (1998) 31-36
255. Meding B., and Ringdahl A. Allergic contact dermatitis from the ear-molds of hearing aids. Ear-Hear 13 (1992) 122-124
256. Sood A., and Taylor J.S. Allergic contact dermatitis from hearing aid materials. Dermatitis 15 (2004) 48-50
257. Mortz C.G., Lauritsen J.M., Bindsley-Jensen C., et al. Nickel sensitization in adolescents and association with ear piercing, use of dental braces, and hand eczema. The Odense Adolescence Cohort Study on Atopic diseases and dermatitis (TOACS). Acta Derm Venereol 82 (2002) 359-364
258. Ehrlich A., Kucenic M., and Belsito D.V. Role of body piercing in the induction of metal allergies. Am J Contact Dermat 12 (2001) 151-155
259. Gawkrodger D.J., Healy J., and Howe A.M. The prevention of nickel contact dermatitis: a review of the use of binding agents and barrier creams. Contact Dermatitis 32 (1995) 257-265
260. Kaufmann R.E., Banner W., Blumer J.L., et al. Clioquinol (iodochlorohydroxyquin, Vioform) and iodoquinol (diiodohydroxyquin): blindness and neuropathy. Pediatrics 86 (1990) 797-798
261. Memon A.A., Molokhia M.M., and Friedmann P.S. The inhibitory effects of topical chelating agents and antioxidants on nickel-induced hypersensitivity reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol 30 (1994) 560-565
262. Wohrl S., Kriechbaumer N., Hemmer W., et al. A cream containing the chelator DTPA (diethylenetriaminepenta-acetic acid) can prevent contact allergic reactions to metals. Contact Dermatitis 44 (2001) 224-228
263. Haudrechy P., Mantout B., Frappaz A., et al. Nickel release from stainless steels. Contact Dermatitis 37 (1997) 113-117
264. Jensen C.S., Menne T., Lisby S., et al. Experimental systemic contact dermatitis from nickel: a dose-response study. Contact Dermatitis 49 (2003) 124-132
265. Antico A., and Soana R. Chronic allergic-like dermatopathies in nickel-sensitive patients. Results of dietary restrictions and challenge with nickel salts. Allergy Asthma Proc 20 (1999) 235-242
266. Fowler J.F. Disulfiram is effective for nickel allergic hand eczema. Am J Contact Dermatitis 3 (1992) 175
267. Rietschel R.L., and Fowler J.F. Fisher's Contact Dermatitis. (ed 5) (2001), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA 638
268. McNeely M.D., Neckay M.W., and Sunderman Jr. E.W. Measurements of nickel in serum and urine as indices of environmental exposure to nickel. Clin Chem 18 (1972) 992
269. Andersen K.E., Nielsen G.D., Flyvvholm M.A., et al. Nickel in tap water. Contact Dermatitis 9 (1983) 140-143
270. Rietschel R.L., and Fowler J.F. Fisher's Contact Dermatitis. (ed 5) (2001), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA 728-729
271. Joneja J.M. Managing Food Allergy and Intolerance: A Practical Guide (1995), J.A. Hall Publications, Port Coquitlam 247-262
272. Grandjean P. Human exposure to nickel. IARC Sci Publ 53 (1984) 469-485
273. Dugo G., La Pera L., Lo Turco V., et al. Determination of Ni (II) in beverages without any sample pretreatment by adsorptive stripping chronopotentiometry (AdSCP). J Agric Food Chem 52 (2004) 1829-1834
274. Flint G.N., and Packirisamy S. Systemic nickel: the contribution made by stainless-steel cooking utensils. Contact Dermatitis 32 (1995) 218-224
275. Pedersen G.A., Mortensen G.K., and Larsen E.H. Beverages as a source of toxic trace element intake. Food Addit Contam 11 (1994) 351-363
276. Pigatto P.D., Gibelli E., Fumagalli M., et al. Disodium cromoglycate versus diet in the treatment and prevention of nickel-positive pompholyx. Contact Dermatitis 22 (1990) 27-31
277. Granchi D., Cenni E., Trisolino G., et al. Sensitivity to implant materials in patients undergoing total hip replacement. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 77 (2006) 257-264
278. Davis M.D., Mowad C.M., and Scheinman P. Orthopedic prostheses: is there any point in patch testing?. Dermatitis 15 (2004) 210-212
279. Spiechowicz E., Glantz P.O., Axell T., et al. A long-term follow-up of allergy to nickel among fixed prostheses wearers. Eur Prosthodont Restor Dent 7 (1999) 41-44
280. Dobson R.L. Earrings for nickel-sensitive women. J Am Acad Dermatol 16 (1987) 631
281. Barker O. All that glitters is not just gold. USA Today (2007) 5D 6/20/
282. Walsh G., and Wilkinson S.M. Materials and allergens within spectacle frames: a review. Contact Dermatitis 55 (2006) 130-139
283. Ruff C.A., and Belsito D.V. The impact of various patient factors on contact allergy to nickel, cobalt, and chromate. J Am Acad Dermatol 55 (2006) 32-39
284. Rietschel R.L., and Fowler J.F. Fisher's Contact Dermatitis. (ed 5) (2001), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA 626
285. Sainio E.L., Jolanki R., Hakala E., et al. Metals and arsenic in eye shadows. Contact Dermatitis 42 (2000) 5-10