Prevalence of patch testing and methodology of dermatologists in the U.S.: Results of a cross-sectional survey

American Journal of Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 53-58

  Warshaw, Erin M ^a   Nelson, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DERMATOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC KIT; HUMAN; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PATCH TEST; PHOTOPATCH TEST; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN ALLERGY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036100439     PISSN: 1046199X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/ajcd.2002.32856     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Limits of ICD-9-CM code usefulness in epidemiological studies of contact and other types of dermatitis
2. Is patch-testing cost-effective?
3. Improved, but not perfect patch testing
4. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens
5. Is the screening patch test tray still worth using?
6. American Academy of Dermatology Patch Testing Survey: Use and effectiveness of this procedure
7. Prevalence of evaluation for latex allergy and association with practice characteristics in U.S. dermatologists: Results of a cross-sectional survey
8. The case for patch test readings beyond day 2
9. Good clinical practice in patch testing: Readings beyond day 2 are necessary: A confirmatory analysis