|
Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 210-212
|
Orthopedic prostheses: Is there any point in patch testing?
a a a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ALLERGEN;
ALUMINUM;
AMMONIUM MERCURIC CHLORIDE;
BERYLLIUM;
CADMIUM CHLORIDE;
CHROMIUM CHLORIDE;
COBALT CHLORIDE;
COBALT SULFATE;
COPPER SULFATE;
DICHROMATE POTASSIUM;
FERRIC CHLORIDE;
GOLD CHLORIDE;
MANGANESE CHLORIDE;
MERCURIC CHLORIDE;
MERCURY;
METAL;
MOLYBDENUM;
NICKEL SULFATE;
PALLADIUM;
POTASSIUM DICYANOAURATE;
RHODIUM;
SILVER NITRATE;
SODIUM AUROTHIOSULFATE;
STAINLESS STEEL;
TETRACHLOROPLATINATE AMMONIUM;
TIN;
TITANIUM;
UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;
UNINDEXED DRUG;
VITALLIUM;
ZINC CHLORIDE;
AGING;
ANAMNESIS;
CONTACT DERMATITIS;
DENTAL CARE;
DEVICE;
HUMAN;
JOINT PROSTHESIS;
METAL IMPLANTATION;
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE;
ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY;
PATCH TEST;
PATIENT COUNSELING;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROSTHESIS LOOSENING;
RASH;
REVIEW;
SKIN SENSITIZATION;
TEXTILE;
|
EID: 13844270681
PISSN: 17103568
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/01206501-200412000-00009 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (11)
|
References (0)
|