Diagnosis and staging of colorectal cancer;Diagnostikk og stadieinndeling av kolorektal kreft

Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening

Volumn 127, Issue 21, 2007, Pages 2824-2828

  Kjellmo, Åse ^a   Drolsum, Anders ^b  

^a TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b ULLEVÅL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CLASSIFICATION; COLON TUMOR; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; RECTUM TUMOR; SIGMOIDOSCOPY;

COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 37549056973     PISSN: 00292001     EISSN: 08077096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 7. utg. New-York: Springer-Verlag, 2006: 107-17.
2. Wibe A, Rendedal PR, Svensson E et al. Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 327-34.
3. Merkel S, Mansmann U, Siassi M et al. The prognostic inhomogeneity in pT3 rectal carcinomas. Int J Colorectal Dis 2001; 16: 298-304.
4. Brown G, Radcliffe AG, Newcombe RG et al. Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 355-64.
5. Burton S, Brown G, Daniels IR et al. MRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins? Br J Cancer 2006; 94: 351-7.
6. Kwok H, Bissett IP, Hill GL. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2000; 15: 9-20.
7. Beets-Tan RGH, Beets GL. Rectal cancer: review with emphasis on MR imaging. Radiology 2004; 232: 335-46.
8. Nesbakken A, Lovig T, Lunde OC et al. Staging of rectal carcinoma with transrectal ultrasonography. Scand J Surg 2003; 92: 125-9.
9. Adams DR, Blatchford GJ, Lin KM et al. Use of preoperative ultrasound staging for treatment of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 159-66.
10. Bipat S, Glas AS, Slors FJM et al. Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT and MR imaging - a meta analysis. Radiology 2004; 232: 773-83.
11. Garcia-Aguilar J, Pollack J, Lee SH et al. Accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in preoperative staging of rectal tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 10-5.
12. Rifkin MD, Ehrlich SM, Marks G. Staging of rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of endorectal US and CT. Radiology 1989; 170: 319-22.
13. Sinha R, Verma R, Rajesh A et al. Diagnostic value of multidetector row CT in rectal cancer staging: comparison of multiplanar and axial images with histopathology. Clin Radiol 2006; 61: 924-31.
14. Matsuoka H, Nakamura A, Masaki T et al. A prospective comparison between multidetector-row computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of rectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 2003; 185: 556-9.
15. Taylor A, Slater A, Mapstone N et al. Staging rectal cancer: MRI compared to MDCT. Abdom Imaging 2007; 32: 323-7.
16. Mathur P, Smith JJ, Ramsay C et al. Comparison of CT and MRI in the pre-operative staging of rectal adenocarcinoma and prediction of circumferential resection margin involvement by MRI. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5: 396-401.
17. Kulinna C, Scheidler J, Strauss T et al. Local staging of rectal cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28: 123-30.
18. Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, van de Velde CJH. Staging in colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer Suppl 2005; 3: 361-6.
19. Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, Vligen RF et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery. Lancet 2001; 357: 497-504.
20. Beets-Tan RG. MRI in rectal cancer: the T stage and circumferential margin. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5: 392-5.
21. Blomqvist L, Machado M, Rubio C et al. Rectal tumour staging: MR imaging using pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils vs endoscopic ultrasound. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 653-60.
22. Laghi A, Ferri M, Catalano C et al. Local staging of rectal cancer with MRI using a phased array body coil. Abdom Imaging 2002; 27: 425-31.
23. Gagliardi G, Bayar S, Smith R et al. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging with external phase-arrayed coil. Arch Surg 2002; 137: 447-51.
24. Brown G, Richards CJ, Newcombe RG et al. Rectal carcinoma: thin-section MR imaging for staging in 28 patients. Radiology 1999; 211: 215-22.
25. Blomqvist L, Rubio C, Holm T et al. Rectal adenocarcinoma: assessment of tumour involvement of the lateral resection margin by MRI of resected specimen. Br J Radiol 1999; 72: 18-23.
26. Branagan G, Chave H, Clare F et al. Can magnetic resonance imaging predict circumferential margins and TNM stage in rectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 1317-22.
27. Lahaye MJ, Engelen SME, Nelemans PJ et al. Imaging for predicting the risk factors - the circumferential resection margin and nodal disease - of local recurrence in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2005; 26: 259-68.
28. MERCURY Study Group. Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study. BMJ 2006; 333: 779.
29. MERCURY Study Group. Extramural depth of tumor invasion at thin-section MR in patients with rectal cancer: results of the MERCURY Study. Radiology 2007; 243: 132-9.
30. Brown G, Daniels IR, Richardson C et al. Techniques and trouble-shooting in high spatial resolution thin slice MRI for rectal cancer. Br J Radiol 2005; 78: 245-51.
31. Norsk Gastrointestinal Cancergruppe. Grønnbok. www.ngicg.no/gronnbok/gronnbok.htm (21.9.2007).
32. Vliegen RF, Beets GL, von Meyenfeldt MF et al. Rectal cancer: MR imaging in local staging - is gadolineum-based contrast material helpful? Radiology 2005; 234: 179-88.
33. Slater A, Halligan S, Taylor SA et al. Distance between the rectal wall and mesorectal fascia measured by MRI: effect of rectal distension and implications for preoperative prediction of a tumour-free circumferential resection margin. Clin Radiol 2006; 61: 65-70.
34. Brown G, Richards CJ, Bourne MW et al. Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopatholgic comparison. Radiology 2003; 227: 371-7.
35. Kim JH, Beets GL, Kim M-J et al. High-resolution MR imaging for nodal staging in rectal cancer: are there any criteria in addition to the size? Eur J Radiol 2004; 52: 78-83.
36. Koh D-M, Brown G, Temple L et al. Rectal cancer: mesorectal lymph nodes at MR imaging with USPIO versus histopatologic findings - intial observations. Radiology 2004; 231: 91-9.
37. Heriot AG, Hicks RJ, Drummond EG et al. Does positron emission tomography change management in primary rectal cancer? A prospective assessment. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 451-8.
38. Levine MS, Glick SN, Rubesin SE et al. Double contrast barium enema examination and colorectal cancer: a plea for radiologic screening. Radiology 2002; 222: 313-5.
39. Winawer SJ, Stewart ET, Zauber AG et al. A comparison of colonoscopy and double contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1766-72.
40. van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy; a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 343-50.
41. Froehlich F, Harris JK, Wietlisbach et al. Current sedation and monitoring practice for colonoscopy; an international observational study (EPAGE). Endoscopy 2006; 38: 461-9.
42. Cobb WS, Heniford BT, Sigmon LB et al. Colonoscopic perforations; incidence, management, and outcomes. Am Surg 2004; 70: 750-7.
43. Anderson ML, Pasha TM, Leighton JA. Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from 10-year study. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 3418-22.
44. Iqbal CW, Chun YS, Farley DR. Colonoscopic perforations: a retrospective review. J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9: 129-35.
45. Gondal G, Grotmol T, Hofstad B et al. The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCAP) screening study. Baseline findings and implementations for clinical work-up in age groups 50-64 years. Scand J Gastroenterol 2003; 38: 635-42.
46. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang Inku et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2191-200.
47. Halligan S, Taylor SA. CT colonography: results and limitations. Eur J Radiol 2007; 61: 400-8.
48. Ringstad G, Holmquist H, Brabrand K et al. CT-kolografi for påvisning av kreft og polypper i tykktarm. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 2006; 126: 1470-3.
49. Juchems MS, Fleiter TR, Pauls S et al. CT colonography; comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 68-72.
50. Taylor SA, Laghi A, Lefere P et al. European society of gastrointestinal and abdominal radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonoscopy. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 575-9.
51. Burling D, Halligan S, Slater A et al. Potentially serious adverse events at CT colonography in symptomatic patients; national survey of the United Kingdom. Radiology 2006; 239: 464-71.
52. Rollandi GA, Biscaldi E, DeCisso E. Double contrast barium enema: technique, indications, results and limitations of a conventional imaging methodology in the MDCT virtual endoscopy era. Eur J Radiol 2007; 61: 382-7.
53. Mauchley DC, Lynge DC, Langdale LA et al. Clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of routine preoperative computed tomography scanning with colon cancer. Am J Surg 2005; 189: 512-7.
54. Ajaj W, Goyen M. MR imaging of the colon: technique, indications, results and limitations. Eur J Radiol 2007; 61: 415-23.
55. Kinkel K, Lu Y, Both M et al. Detection of hepatic metastases from cancer of the gastrointestinal tract by using non-invasive imaging methods (US, CT, MR imaging, PET): a meta-analysis. Radiology 2002; 224: 748-56.
56. Albrecht T, Hohmann J, Oldenburg A et al. Detection and characterisation of liver metastases. Eur Radiol 2004; 14 (suppl 8): 25-33.
57. Llamas-Elvira JM, Rodriguez-Fernandez A, Gutierrez-Sáinz J et al. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the preoperative staging of colorectal cancer. Eur J Nucl Mol Imaging 2007; 34: 859-67.
58. Kantorova I, Lipska L, Belohlavek O et al. Routine 18F-FDG-PET preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: comparison with conventional staging and its impact on treatment decision making. J Nucl Med 2003; 44: 1784-8.
59. Watson AJ, Lolohea S, Robertson GM et al. The role of positron emission tomography in the management of recurrent colorectal cancer: a review. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 50: 102-14.
60. Huebner RH, Parks KC, Shepherd JE et al. A meta-analysis if the literature for whole-body FDG PET detection of recurrent colorectal cancer. J Nucl Med 2000; 41: 1177-89.
61. Cohade C, Osman M, Leal J et al. Direct comparison of 18-F-FDG-PET and PET-CT in patients with colorectal carcinoma. J Nucl Med 2003; 44: 1797-803.
62. Antoch G, Saoudi N, Kuehl H et al. Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 4357-68.
63. Gollub MJ, Schwartz LH, Akhurst T. Update on colorectal cancer imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 2007; 45: 85-118.