Diagnostic value of multidetector row CT in rectal cancer staging: comparison of multiplanar and axial images with histopathology

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 61, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 924-931

  Sinha, R ^a   Verma, R ^a   Rajesh, A ^a   Richards, C J ^b  

^a Departments of Radiology

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BARIUM SULFATE; IOPAMIDOL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM CANCER; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33749067796     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.03.019     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Beets-Tan R.G.H., and Beets G.L. Rectal cancer: review with emphasis on MR imaging. Radiology 232 (2004) 335-346
2. Adam I.J., Mohamdee M.O., Martin I.G., et al. Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet 344 (1994) 707-711
3. Quirke P., Durdley P., Dixon M.F., et al. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection: histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2 (1986) 996-999
4. Kulinna C., Eibel R., Matzek W., et al. Staging of rectal cancer: diagnostic potential of multiplanar reconstructions with MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183 (2004) 421-427
5. Taylor A., Sheridan M., McGee S., et al. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by MRI; results of a UK survey. Clin Radiol 60 (2005) 579-586
6. Brown G., Richards C.J., Newcombe R.G., et al. Rectal carcinoma: thin-section MR imaging for staging in 28 patients. Radiology 211 (1999) 215-222
7. Hunerbein M., Pegios W., Rau B., et al. Prospective comparison of endorectal ultrasound, three-dimensional endorectal ultrasound, and endorectal MRI in the preoperative evaluation of rectal tumors: preliminary results. Surg Endosc 14 (2000) 1005-1009
8. Beets-Tan R.G., Beets G.L., van der Hoop A.G., et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the anorectal region without an endocoil. Abdom Imaging 24 (1999) 576-581
9. Beets-Tan R.G., Beets G.L., Vliegen R.F., et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumor-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery. Lancet 357 (2001) 497-504
10. Blomqvist L., Holm T., Rubio C., et al. Rectal tumors: MR imaging with endorectal and/or phased-array coils, and histopathological staging on giant sections-a comparative study. Acta Radiol 38 (1997) 437-444
11. Gagliardi G., Bayar S., Smith R., et al. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging with external phase-arrayed coils. Arch Surg 137 (2002) 447-451
12. Thoeni R.F., Moss A.A., Schnyder P., et al. Detection and staging of primary rectal and rectosigmoid cancer by computed tomography. Radiology 141 (1981) 135-138
13. Zaunbauer W., Haertel M., and Fuchs W.A. Computed tomography in carcinoma of the rectum. Gastrointest Radiol 6 (1981) 79-84
14. van Waes P.F., Koehler P.R., and Feldberg M.A. Management of rectal carcinoma: impact of computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 140 (1983) 1137-1142
15. Rifkin M.D., Ehrlich S.M., and Marks G. Staging of rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of endorectal US and CT. Radiology 170 (1989) 319-322
16. Kim N.K., Kim M.J., Yun S.H., et al. Comparative study of transrectal ultrasonography, pelvic computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42 (1999) 770-775
17. Kwok H., Bissett I.P., and Hill G.L. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 15 (2000) 9-20
18. Grabbe E., Lierse W., and Winkler R. The peri-rectal fascia: morphology and use in staging of rectal carcinoma. Radiology 149 (1983) 241-246
19. Hodgman C.G., MacCarty R.L., Wolff B.G., et al. Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by computed tomography and 0.15 T magnetic resonance imaging. Preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum 29 (1986) 446-450
20. Matsuoka H., Nakamura A., Masaki T., et al. Preoperative staging by multidetector-row computed tomography in patients with rectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 184 (2002) 131-135
21. Slater A., Halligan S., Taylor S.A., et al. Distance between the rectal wall and mesorectal fascia measured by MRI: effect of rectal distension and implications for preoperative prediction of a tumour-free circumferential resection margin. Clin Radiol 61 (2006) 65-70
22. Maier A.G., Barton P.P., Neuhold N.R., et al. Peritumoral tissue reaction at transrectal US as a possible cause of overstaging in rectal cancer: histopathologic correlation. Radiology 203 (1997) 785-789
23. Brown G., Richard C.J., Bourne M.W., et al. Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison. Radiology 227 (2003) 371-377