Update on Colorectal Cancer Imaging

Radiologic Clinics of North America

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 85-118

  Gollub, Marc J ^a   Schwartz, Lawrence H ^a   Akhurst, Tim ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; BARIUM; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN; CONTRAST MEDIUM; ESTROGEN; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; GADOLINIUM; GESTAGEN; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COENZYME A REDUCTASE INHIBITOR; HYPOCHOLESTEROLEMIC AGENT; IODINE; NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT;

ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; BARIUM ENEMA; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; CAUSE OF DEATH; COLON CANCER; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; DNA DETERMINATION; ENDOSCOPY; FAMILY HISTORY; FOLLOW UP; GENETIC COUNSELING; HEALTH CARE COST; HEMATOCHEZIA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGING; IMMOBILIZATION; LIVER METASTASIS; MEDICAID; METASTASIS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MORTALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OCCULT BLOOD; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PUBERTY; RECTUM CANCER; RECURRENT CANCER; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SMOKING; ULTRASOUND;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BARIUM SULFATE; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DNA, NEOPLASM; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; ENEMA; FECES; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTESTINAL POLYPS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; OCCULT BLOOD; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROGNOSIS; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33845231344     PISSN: 00338389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2006.10.003     Document Type: Review

References (135)

1. Spann S., Levin B., Rozen P., et al. Colorectal cancer: How big is the problem, why prevent it and how might it present?. In: Rozen P., Young G., and Levin B. (Eds). Colorectal cancer in clinical practice: prevention, early detection and management (2002), Martin Dunitz, London 1-13
2. Mulhall B.P., Veerappan G.R., and Jackson J.L. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med 142 (2005) 635-650
3. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2006 (2006), American Cancer Society, Atlanta
4. Nusko G., Mansmann U., Partzsch U., et al. Invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas: multivariate analysis of patient and adenoma characteristics. Endoscopy 29 (1997) 626-631
5. Gore R.M., Gelfand D.W., Smith C., et al. Colorectal cancer: clinical and pathologic features, screening strategies, radiologic diagnosis and radiologic staging. Radiol Clin north Am 35 (1997) 403-487
6. Goldberg R.M., Sargent D.J., Morton R.F., et al. A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 1 (2004) 23-30
7. Pignone M., Saha S., Hoerger T., et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 137 (2002) 96-104
8. Imperiale T.F., Ransohoff D.F., Itzkowitz S.H., et al. Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population. N Engl J Med 351 (2004) 2704-2714
9. Ristvedt S.L., McFarland E.G., Weinstock L.B., et al. Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 98 (2003) 578-585
10. Muto T., Bussey H.J., and Morson B.C. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 36 (1975) 2251-2270
11. Winawer S.J., Fletcher R.F., Rex D., et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale. Update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 124 (2003) 544-560
12. Ferrucci J.T. Virtual colonoscopy for colon cancer screening: further reflections on polyps and politics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181 (2003) 795-797
13. Hawk E.T., and Levin B. Colorectal cancer prevention. J Clin Oncol 23 (2005) 378-391
14. Mak T., Lalloo F., Evans D.G.R., et al. Molecular stool screening for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91 (2004) 790-800
15. Podolsky D.K. Going the distance: the case for true colorectal cancer screening. N Engl J Med 343 (2000) 207-208
16. Fearon E.R., and Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell 61 (1990) 759-767
17. Levine M.S., Glick S.N., Rubesin S.E., et al. Double-contrast barium enema examination and colorectal cancer: a plea for radiologic screening. Radiology 222 (2002) 313-315
18. Winawer S.J., Stewart E.T., Zauber A.G., et al. A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. N Engl J Med 342 (2000) 1766-1772
19. Scheitel S.M., Ahlquist D.A., Wollan P.C., et al. Colorectal cancer screening: a community case-control study of proctosigmoidoscopy, barium enema radiography, and fecal occult blood test efficacy. Mayo Clin Proc 74 (1999) 1207-1213
20. Rex D.K., Rahmani E.Y., Haseman J.H., et al. Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice. Gastroenterology 112 (1997) 17-23
21. Fletcher R.H. The end of barium enemas?. [editorial]. N Engl J Med 342 (2000) 1823-1824
22. Glick S.N. Comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema, correspondence. N Engl J Med 343 (2000) 1728-1730
23. Winawer S.J., Fletcher R.H., Miller L., et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 112 (1997) 594-642
24. Citarda F., Tomaselli G., Capocaccia R., et al. Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut 48 (2001) 812-815
25. Winawer S.J., Zauber A.G., Ho M.N., et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy: The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 329 (1993) 1977-1981
26. National Cancer Institute Web site. Available at: http://www.nci.nih.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/ColorectalPLCO.
27. Lieberman D.A., Weiss D.G., Bond J.H., et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 343 (2000) 162-168
28. Habr-Gama A., and Waye J.D. Complications and hazards of gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Surg 13 (1989) 193-201
29. Blakeborough A., Sheridan M.B., and Chapman A.H. Complications of barium enema examinations: a survey of UK consultant radiologists 1992 to 1994. Clin Radiol 52 (1997) 142-148
30. Rex D.K., Cutler C.S., Lemmel G.T., et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 112 (1997) 24-28
31. Lieberman D. Quality and colonoscopy: a new imperative. Gastrointest Endosc 61 (2005) 392-394
32. Pickhardt P.J., Nugent P.A., Mysliwiec P.A., et al. The adenoma miss rate at optical colonoscopy: a novel assessment using virtual colonoscopy as a separate reference standard. Ann Intern Med 141 (2004) 352-359
33. Smith R.A., Cokkinides V., von Eschenbach A.C., et al. American Cancer Society Guidelines for early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 52 (2002) 8-22
34. Mysliwiec P.A., Brown M.L., Klabunde C.N., et al. Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med 141 (2004) 264-271
35. Seeff L.C., Manninen D.L., Dong F.B., et al. Is there endoscopic capacity to provide colorectal cancer screening to the unscreened population in the United States?. Gastroenterology 127 (2004) 1841-1844
36. Saitoh Y., Obara T., Watari J., et al. Invasion depth diagnosis of depressed type early colorectal cancers by combined use of videoendoscopy and chromoendoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 48 (1998) 362-370
37. Pickhardt P.J., Choi J.R.C., Hwang I., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349 (2003) 2191-2200
38. Halligan S., Altman D.G., Taylor S.A., et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 237 (2005) 893-904
39. Banerjee S., and Van Dam J. CT colonography for colon cancer screening. Gastrointest Endosc 63 (2006) 121-133
40. Cotton P.B., Durkalski V.L., Pineau B.C., et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291 (2004) 1713-1719
41. Ferrucci J.T. Colonoscopy: virtual and optical-another look, another view. Radiology 235 (2005) 13-16
42. Sonnenberg A., Delco F., and Bauerfeind P. Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer?. Am J Gastroenterol 94 (1999) 2268-2274
43. Ladabaum U., Song K., and Fendrick A.M. Colorectal neoplasia screening with virtual colonoscopy: when, at what cost, and with what national impact?. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2 (2004) 554-563
44. Heitman S., Fong A., Dean S., et al. Cost-effectiveness study of CT colonography versus colonoscopy using decision analysis. [abstract]. Gastroenterology 126 (2004) A202
45. van Gelder R.E., Florie J., and Stoker J. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance with CT colonography: current controversies and obstacles. Abdom Imaging 30 (2005) 5-12
46. van Gelder R.E., Birnie E., Florie J., et al. Patient experience and preference with CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: a five-week follow-up study. Radiology 233 (2004) 328-337
47. Burling D., Halligan S., Slater A., et al. Potentially serious adverse events at CT colonography in symptomatic patients: national survey of the United Kingdom. Radiology 239 (2006) 464-471
48. Sosna J., Blachar A., Amitai M., et al. Colonic perforation at CT colonography: assessment of risk in a multicenter large cohort. Radiology 239 (2006) 457-463
49. van Gelder R.E., Nio C.Y., Florie J., et al. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 127 (2004) 41-48
50. Rubesin S.E., Levine M.S., Laufer I., et al. Double-contrast barium enema examination technique. Radiology 215 (2000) 642-650
51. Eide T.J. Colorectal polyps: a symposium. World J Surg 15 (1991) 1-56
52. Torlakovic E., and Snover D.C. Serrated adenomatous polyposis in humans. Gastroenterology 100 (1996) 748-755
53. Levine M.S., Rubesin S.E., Laufer I., et al. Diagnosis of colorectal neoplasms at double-contrast barium enema examination. Radiology 216 (2000) 11-18
54. Rembacken B.J., Fujii T., Cairns A., et al. Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 355 (2000) 1211-1214
55. Saitoh Y., Waxman I., West A.B., et al. Prevalence and distinctive biologic features of flat colorectal adenomas in a North American population. Gastroenterology 120 (2001) 1657-1665
56. Fujiya M., and Maruyama M. Small depressed neoplasms of the large bowel: radiographic visualization and clinical significance. Abdom Imaging 22 (1997) 325-331
57. Lee J.T., Dixon M.R., Murrell Z., et al. Colonic histoplasmosis presenting as colon cancer in the non immunocompromised patient: report of a case and review of the literature. Am Surg 70 (2004) 959-963
58. Ott D.J., Chen Y.M., Gelfand D.W., et al. Single-contrast vs double-contrast barium enema in the detection of colonic polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 146 (1986) 993-996
59. Prokop M. Image processing and display techniques. In: Prokop M., and Galnski M. (Eds). Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body (2003), Thieme, Sttugart 45-82
60. Brink J.A. Contrast optimization and scan timing for single and multidetector-row computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27 Suppl 1 (2003) S3-S8
61. Mauchley D.C., Lynge D.C., Langdale L.A., et al. Clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of routine preoperative computed tomography scanning in patients with colon cancer. Am J Surg 189 (2005) 512-517
62. Chintapalli K.N., Esola C.C., Chopra S., et al. Pericolic mesenteric lymph nodes: an aid in distinguishing diverticulitis from cancer of the colon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169 (1997) 1253-1255
63. De Bree E., Koops W., Kroger R., et al. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal or appendiceal origin: correlation of preoperative CT with intraoperative findings and evaluation of interobserver agreement. J Surg Oncol 86 (2004) 64-73
64. Burke E.C., Karpeh M.S., Conlon K.C., et al. Laparoscopy in the management of gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 225 (1997) 262-267
65. Ginsberg M.S., Griff S.K., Go B.D., et al. Pulmonary nodules resected at video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: etiology in 426 patients. Radiology 213 (1999) 277-282
66. You Y.T., Chien C.R.C., Wang J.Y., et al. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography in detection of local recurrent colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 12 (2006) 123-126
67. Fetita C., Lucidarme O., Preteux F., et al. CT hepatic venography: 3D vascular segmentation for preoperative evaluation. Med Image Comput Assist Interv Int Conf 8 Pt 2 (2005) 830-837
68. Sahani D., Mehta A., Blake M., et al. Preoperative hepatic vascular evaluation with CT and MR angiography: implications for surgery. Radiographics 24 (2004) 1367-1380
69. Easson A.M., Barron P.T., Cripps C., et al. Calcification in colorectal hepatic metastases correlates with longer survival. J Surg Oncol 63 (1996) 221-225
70. Kinkel K., Lu Y., Both M., et al. Detection of hepatic metastases from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract by using noninvasive imaging methods (US, CT, MR imaging, PET): a meta-analysis. Radiology 224 (2002) 748-756
71. Abdelmoumene A., Chevallier P., Chalaron M., et al. Detection of liver metastases under 2 cm: comparison of different acquisition protocols in four row multidetector-CT (MDCT). Eur Radiol 15 (2005) 1881-1887
72. Valls C., Andia E., Sanchez A., et al. Hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: preoperative detection and assessment of resectability with helical CT. Radiology 218 (2001) 55-60
73. Vining D.J., Gelfand D.W., Bechtold R.E., et al. Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality. [abstract]. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162 (1995) 194
74. Johnson C.D., MacCarty R.L., Welch T.J., et al. Comparison of the relative sensitivity of CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2 (2004) 314-321
75. Macari M., Berman P., Dicker M., et al. Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173 (1999) 561-564
76. Fenlon H.M., McAneny D.B., Nunes D.P., et al. Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon. Radiology 210 (1999) 423-428
77. Neri E., Giusti P., Battolla L., et al. Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 223 (2002) 615-619
78. Fletcher J.G., Johnson C.D., Krueger W.R., et al. Contrast-enhanced CT colonography in recurrent colorectal carcinoma: feasibility of simultaneous evaluation for metastatic disease, local recurrence, and metachronous neoplasia in colorectal carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178 (2002) 283-290
79. Macari M., Lavelle M., Pedrosa I., et al. Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography. Radiology 218 (2001) 274-7
80. Burling D., Taylor S.A., Halligan S., et al. Automated insufflation of carbon dioxide for MDCT colonography: distension and patient experience compared with manual insufflation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 (2006) 96-103
81. Yee J., Hung R.K., Akerkar G.A., et al. The usefulness of glucagon hydrochloride for colonic distention in CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173 (1999) 169-172
82. Taylor S.A., Halligan S., Goh V., et al. Optimizing colonic distention for multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine butylbromide and rectal balloon catheter. Radiology 229 (2003) 99-108
83. Lefere P.A., Gryspeerdt S.S., Dewyspelaere J., et al. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology 224 (2002) 393-403
84. Hoppe H., Quattropani C., Spreng A., et al. Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182 (2004) 1151-1158
85. Summers R.M., Jerebko A.K., Franaszek M., et al. Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography. Radiology 225 (2002) 391-399
86. van Gelder R.E., Venema H.W., Serlie I.W., et al. CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 224 (2002) 25-33
87. Cohnen M., Vogt C., Beck A., et al. Feasibility of MDCT Colonography in ultra-low-dose technique in the detection of colorectal lesions: comparison with high-resolution video colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183 (2004) 1355-1359
88. Edwards J.T., Mendelson R.M., Fritschi L., et al. Colorectal neoplasia screening with CT colonography in average-risk asymptomatic subjects: community-based study. Radiology 230 (2004) 459-464
89. Gluecker T.M., Johnson C.D., Harmsen W.S., et al. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 227 (2003) 378-384
90. Pickhardt P.J., Taylor A.J., Johnson G.L., et al. Building a CT colonography program: necessary ingredients for reimbursement and clinical success. Radiology 235 (2005) 17-20
91. Practice Guidelines ACR, Colonography CT. 10/01/05, p. 295-9. Available at: ======http://www.acr.org/s_acr/bin.asp?TrackID=&SID=1&DID=14802&CID=1848&VID=2&DOC=File.PDF.
92. Zalis M.E., Barish M.A., Choi J.R., et al. Working Group on Virtual Colonoscopy. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236 (2005) 3-9
93. Macari M., Bini E.J., Jacobs S.L., et al. Filling defects at CT colonography: pseudo- and diminutive lesions (the good), polyps (the bad), flat lesions, masses, and carcinomas (the ugly). Radiographics 23 (2003) 1073-1091
94. Morrin M.M., Farrell R.J., Kruskal J.B., et al. Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology 217 (2000) 765-771
95. Lefere P., Gryspeerdt S., Baekelandt M., et al. Laxative-free CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183 (2004) 945-948
96. Iannaccone R., Laghi A., Catalano C., et al. Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 127 (2004) 1300-1311
97. Luboldt W., Bauerfeind P., Wildermuth S., et al. Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. Radiology 216 (2000) 383-388
98. Luboldt W., Bauerfeind P., Wildermuth S., et al. Contrast optimization for assessment of colonic wall and lumen in MR colonography. J Magn Reson Imaging 9 (1999) 745-750
99. Ajaj W., Pelster G., Vogt F., et al. Dark lumen MR colonography: comparison to conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology. Gut 52 (2003) 1738-1743
100. Albrecht T., Hohmann J., Oldenburg A., et al. Detection and characterization of liver metastases. Eur Radiol 14 Suppl 8 (2004) P25-P33
101. Jang H.J., Kim T.K., and Wilson S.R. Imaging of malignant liver masses: characterization and detection. Ultrasound Q 22 (2006) 19-29
102. Bhattacharjya S., Bhattacharjya T., Baber S., et al. Prospective study of contrast-enhanced computed tomography, computed tomography during arterioportography, and magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal liver metastases for liver resection. Br J Surg 91 (2004) 1361-1369
103. Mahfouz A.-E., Hamm B., Taupitz M., et al. Hypervascular liver lesions: differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from malignant tumors with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 186 (1993) 133-138
104. Mahfouz A.-E., Hamm B., and Wolf K.-J. Peripheral wash-out: a sign of malignancy on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images of focal liver lesions. Radiology 190 (1994) 49-52
105. Titu L.V., Breen D.J., Nicholson A.A., et al. Is routine magnetic resonance imaging justified for the early detection of resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer?. Dis Colon Rectum 49 (2006) 810-815
106. Warburg O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science 123 (1956) 309-314
107. Weber W.A., Ott K., Becker K., et al. Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction by metabolic imaging. J Clin Oncol 19 (2001) 3058-3065
108. Wieder H.A., Brucher B.L., Zimmermann F., et al. Time course of tumor metabolic activity during chemoradiotherapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and response to treatment. J Clin Oncol 22 (2004) 900-908
109. Ott K., Fink U., Becker K., et al. Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in gastric carcinoma by metabolic imaging: results of a prospective trial. J Clin Oncol 21 (2003) 4604-4610
110. Choi M.Y., Lee K.M., Chung J.K., et al. Correlation between serum CEA level and metabolic volume as determined by FDG PET in postoperative patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. Ann Nucl Med 19 (2005) 123-129
111. Zervos E.E., Badgwell B.D., Burak Jr. W.E., et al. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography as an adjunct to carcinoembryonic antigen in the management of patients with presumed recurrent colorectal cancer and nondiagnostic radiologic workup. Surgery 130 (2001) 636-643 [discussion: 643-4]
112. Kemeny N.E., and Gonen M. Hepatic arterial infusion after liver resection. N Engl J Med 352 (2005) 734-735
113. Fong Y., Saldinger P.F., Akhurst T., et al. Utility of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography scanning on selection of patients for resection of hepatic colorectal metastases. Am J Surg 178 (1999) 282-287
114. Selzner M., Hany T.F., Wildbrett P., et al. Does the novel PET/CT imaging modality impact on the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer of the liver?. Ann Surg 240 (2004) 1027-1034
115. Akhurst T.J., Gonen M., Tuorto S., et al. Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as measured by PET predicts outcome after liver resection for colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol 24 (2006) 3056
116. Hixson L.J., Fennerty M.B., Sampliner R.E., et al. Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 37 (1991) 125-127
117. Van Dam J. Novel methods of enhanced endoscopic imaging. Gut 52 Suppl 4 (2003) 12-16
118. Quirke P., Durdey P., Dixon M.F., et al. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection: histopathological study of lateral tumor spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2 (1986) 996-999
119. Herbst F. Pelvic radiological imaging: a surgeon's perspective. Eur J Radiol 47 (2003) 135-141
120. Salerno G., Daniels I.R., Fisher S.E., et al. A comparison of digital rectal examination versus magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of circumferential resection margin status in patients. [abstract P172]. Colorectal Disease 7 Suppl 2 (2005) 56
121. Schaffzin D.M., and Wong D.W. Endorectal ultrasound in the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 4 (2004) 124-132
122. Kwok H., Bissett I.P., and Hill G.I. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 15 (2000) 9-20
123. Bipat S., Glas A.S., Slors F.J., et al. Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT and MR imaging: a meta-analysis. Radiology 232 (2004) 773-783
124. Kulinna C., Eibel R., Matzek W., et al. Staging of rectal cancer: diagnostic potential of multiplanar reconstructions with MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183 (2004) 421-427
125. Brown G., Richards C.J., Bourne M.W., et al. Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison. Radiology 227 (2003) 371-377
126. Brown G., and Daniels I.R. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: The MERCURY Research Project. Recent Results Cancer Res 165 (2005) 58-74
127. Shoup M., Guillem J.G., Alektiar K.M., et al. Predictors of survival in recurrent rectal cancer after resection and intraoperative radiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 45 (2002) 585-592
128. Beets-Tan R.G., Beets G.L., Borstlap A.C., et al. Preoperative assessment of local tumor extent in advanced rectal cancer: CT or high-resolution MRI?. Abdom Imaging 25 (2000) 533-541
129. Gearhart S.L., Frassica D., Rosen R., et al. Improved staging with pretreatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography in low rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 13 (2006) 397-404
130. Guillem J.G., Puig-La Calle Jr. J., Akhurst T., et al. Prospective assessment of primary rectal cancer response to preoperative radiation and chemotherapy using 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Dis Colon Rectum 43 (2000) 18-24
131. Guillem J.G., Moore H.G., Akhurst T., et al. Sequential preoperative fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography assessment of response to preoperative chemoradiation: a means for determining long term outcomes of rectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg 199 (2004) 1-7
132. Mortazavi A., Shaukat A., Othman E., et al. Postoperative computed tomography scan surveillance for patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer; worthy of further study?. Am J Clin Oncol 28 (2005) 30-35
133. Pfister D.G., Benson III A.B., and Somerfield M.R. Clinical practice: surveillance strategies after curative treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 350 (2004) 2375-2382
134. Rodriguez-Moranta F., Salo J., Arcusa A., et al. Postoperative surveillance in patients with colorectal cancer who have undergone curative resection: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 24 (2006) 385-393
135. 18FDG PET imaging of colon polyps: a potential technique for selective cancer and pre-cancerous lesion detection. Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:1-9.