Rectal cancer: MR imaging in local staging - Is gadolinium-based contrast material helpful?

Radiology

Volumn 234, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 179-188

  Vliegen, Roy F A ^a   Beets, Geerard L ^a   Von Meyenfeldt, Maarten F ^a   Kessels, Alfons G H ^a   Lemaire, Etienne E M T ^a   Van Engelshoven, Jos M A ^a   Beets Tan, Regina G H ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CALCULATION; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FASCIA; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RECTUM; RECTUM CANCER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; STANDARD; TUMOR GROWTH;

ADULT; AGED; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 10644235442     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2341031403     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Sagar PM, Pemberton JH. Surgical management of locally recurrent rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1996; 83:293-304.
2. Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Dudley HA. Surgeon-related variables and the clinical trial. Lancet 1978; 2:778-779.
3. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection: histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 1986; 2:996-999.
4. Quirke P, Dixon MF. The prediction of local recurrence in rectal adenocarcinoma by histopathological examination. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988; 3:127-131.
5. Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1986; 1:1479-1482.
6. Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer: Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 980-987.
7. Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group. Adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic overview of 8,507 patients from 22 randomised trials. Lancet 2001; 358:1291-1304.
8. Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:638-646.
9. Laghi A, Ferri M, Catalano C, et al. Local staging of rectal cancer with MRI using a phased array body coil. Abdom Imaging 2002; 27:425-431.
10. Wiggers T, van de Velde CJ. The circumferential margin in rectal cancer: recommendations based on the Dutch Total Mesorectal Excision study. Eur J Cancer 2002; 38:973-976.
11. Brown G, Richards CJ, Newcombe RG, et al. Rectal carcinoma: thin-section MR imaging for staging in 28 patients. Radiology 1999; 211:215-222.
12. Bissett IP, Fernando CC, Hough DM, et al. Identification of the fascia propria by magnetic resonance imaging and its relevance to preoperative assessment of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44:259-265.
13. Okizuka H, Sugimura K, Yoshizako T, Kaij Y, Wada A. Rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of conventional and gadopentetate dimeglumine enhanced fat-suppressed MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6:465-471.
14. Maier AG, Kersting-Sommerhoff B, Reeders JW, et al. Staging of rectal cancer by double-contrast MR imaging using the rectally administered superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agent ferristine and IV gadodiamide injection: results of a multicenter phase II trial. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12:651-660.
15. Vogl TJ, Pegios W, Mack MG, et al. Accuracy of staging rectal tumors with contrast-enhanced transrectal MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:1427-1434.
16. Wallengren NO, Holtås S, Andrén-Sandberg Å, Jonsson E, Kristoffersson DT, McGill S. Rectal carcinoma: double contrast MR imaging for preoperative staging. Radiology 2000; 215:108-114.
17. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148:839-843.
18. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968; 70:213-230.
19. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:159-174.
20. Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, Vliegen RF, et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery. Lancet 2001; 357: 497-504.
21. Blomqvist L, Holm T, Rubio C, Hindmarsh T. Rectal tumours: MR imaging with endorectal and/or phased-array coils, and histopathological staging on giant sections. Acta Radiol 1997; 38:437-444.
22. Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg EK, et al. Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 2002; 26:350-357.
23. Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, Borstlap AC, et al. Preoperative assessment of local tumor extent in advanced rectal cancer: CT or high resolution MRI? Abdom Imaging 2000; 25: 533-541.
24. Blomqvist L, Rubio C, Holm T, Machado M, Hindmarsh T. Rectal adenocarcinoma: assessment of tumour involvement of the lateral resection margin by MRI of resected specimen. Br J Radiol 1999; 72:18-23.
25. Brown G, Radcliffe AG, Newcombe RG, Dallimore NS, Bourne MW, Williams GT. Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Surg 2003; 90:355-364.