A prospective comparison between multidetector-row computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of rectal carcinoma

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 185, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 556-559

  Matsuoka, Hiroyoshi ^a   Nakamura, Akihisa ^a   Masaki, Tadahiko ^a   Sugiyama, Masanori ^a   Takahara, Taro ^a   Hachiya, Junichi ^a   Atomi, Yutaka ^a  

^a KYORIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging; Multidetector row computed tomography; Multislice computed tomography; Rectal carcinoma

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECTUM CARCINOMA;

EID: 0038020979     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00067-9     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Nicholls R.J., Mason A.Y., Morson B.C., et al. The clinical staging of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 69:1982;404-409.
2. Strark M., Bohe M., Fork F.T., et al. Endoluminal ultrasound and low-field magnetic resonance imaging are superior to clinical examination in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Eur J Surg. 161:1995;841-845.
3. Hu H., He H.D., Foley W.D., Fox S.H. Four multidetector-row helical CT image quality and volume coverage speed . Radiology. 215:2000;55-62.
4. Butch R.J., Stark D.D., Wittenberg J., et al. Staging rectal cancer by MR imaging and CT. AJR Am J Roentogenol. 146:1986;1155-1160.
5. Hodgeman C.G., MacCarty R.L., Wolff B.G., et al. Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by computed tomography and 0.15T magnetic resonance imaging. Preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum. 29:1986;446-450.
6. Guinet C., Buy J.N., Ghossain M.A., et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Arch Surg. 125:1990;385-388.
7. Hermanek P., Sobin L.H. UICC TNM classification of malignant tumors . 4th ed. 1987;Springer, Tokyo.
8. Thoeni R.F., Moss A.A., Schnyder P., Margulis A.R. Detection and staging of primary rectal and rectosigmoid cancer by computed tomography. Radiology. 141:1981;135-138.
9. Okizuka H., Sugimura K., Ishida T. Preoperative local staging of rectal carcinoma with MR imaging and a rectal balloon. J Mag Reson Imag. 3:1993;329-335.
10. Brown G., Richards C.J., Newcombe R.G., et al. Rectal carcinoma thin-section MR imaging for staging in 28 patients . Radiology. 211:1999;215-222.
11. Adolsteinsson B., Glimelius B., Graffman S., et al. Computer tomography in staging rectal carcinoma. Acta Radiol. 26:1985;45-50.
12. Thaler W., Watzka S., Martin F., et al. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by endoluminal ultrasound vs. magnetic resonance imaging. Preliminary results of a prospective, comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum. 37:1994;1189-1193.
13. Blomqvist L., Rubio C., Holm T., et al. Rectal adenocarcinoma assessment of tumour involvment of the lateral resection margin by MRI of resected specimen . B J Radiol. 72:1999;18-23.
14. Hadfield M.B., Nicholson A.A., MacDonald A.W., et al. Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by magnetic resonance imaging with a phased array coil. Br J Surg. 84:1997;529-531.
15. Indinnimeo M., Grasso R.F., Cicchini C., et al. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative staging of rectal tumors. Int Surg. 81:1996;419-422.
16. Drew P.J., Farouk R., Turnbull L.W., et al. Preoperative magnetic resonance staging of rectal cancer with an endorectal coil and dynamic gadolinium enhancement. Br J Surg. 86:1999;250-254.