Population-specific metabolic phenotypes of Arabidopsis lyrata ssp. petraea

New Phytologist

Volumn 177, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 380-388

  Davey, Matthew P ^a   Burrell, Mike M ^a   Woodward, F Ian ^a   Quick, W Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Arabidopsis lyrata petraea; Direct injection mass spectrometry; Environmental metabolomics; Marginal populations; Metabolic phenotypes; Metabolite fingerprinting

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID;

AMINO ACID; BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; DICOTYLEDON; ECOPHYSIOLOGY; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; LATITUDINAL GRADIENT; LOCAL ADAPTATION; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLISM; PHENOTYPE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GERMANY; ICELAND; METABOLISM; PHENOTYPE; SWEDEN; UNITED KINGDOM;

AMINO ACIDS; ARABIDOPSIS; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; GERMANY; ICELAND; PHENOTYPE; SWEDEN; VARIATION (GENETICS); WALES;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY; ICELAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN; UNITED KINGDOM; WALES; WESTERN EUROPE;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS LYRATA;

EID: 37349118022     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02282.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. van den Berg R, Hoefsloot HCJ, Westerhuis JA, Smilde AK, van den Werf MJ. 2006. Centering, scaling, and transformations: improving the biological information content of metabolomics data. BMC Genomics 7 : 142.
2. Boyes DC, Zayed AM, Ascenzi R, McCaskill AJ, Hoffman NE, Davis KR, Görlach J. 2001. growth-stage based phenotypic analysis of Arabidopsis: a model for high throughout functional genomics in plants. Plant Cell 13 : 1499 1510.
3. Catchpole GS, Beckmann M, Enot DP, Mondhe M, Zywicki B, Taylor J, Hardy N, Smith A, Kinng RD, Kell DB, Fiehn O, Draper J. 2005. Hierarchical metabolomics demonstrates substantial compositional similarity between genetically modified and conventional potato crops. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102 : 14458 14462.
4. Clauss MJ, Dietel S, Schubert G, Mitchell-Olds T. 2006. Glucosinolate and trichome defenses in a natural Arabidopsis lyrata population. Journal of Chemical Ecology 32 : 2351 2373.
5. Clauss MJ, Koch MA. 2006. Poorly known relatives of Arabidopsis thaliana. Trends in Plant Science 11 : 449 459.
6. Clauss MJ, Mitchell-Olds T. 2006. Population genetic structure of Arabidopsis lyrata. Europe. Molecular Ecology 15 : 2753 2766.
7. Dunn WB, Overy S, Quick WP. 2005. Evaluation of automated electrospray-TOF mass spectrometry for metabolic fingerprinting of the plant metabolome. Metabolomics 1 : 137 148.
8. Fiehn O, Kopka J, Dörmann P, Altmann T, Trethewey RN, Willmitzer L. 2000. Metabolite profiling for plant functional genetics. Nature Biotechnology 18 : 1157 1161.
9. Gaudeul M, Stenøien HK, Ågren J. 2007. Landscape structure, clonal propagation, and genetic diversity in Scandinavian populations of Arabidopsis lyrata (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 94 : 1146 1155.
10. Gray GR, Heath D. 2005. A global reorganization of the metabolome in Arabidopsis during cold acclimation is revealed by metabolic fingerprinting. Physiologia Plantarum 124 : 236 248.
11. Halkier DA, Du L. 1997. The biosynthesis of glucosinolates. Trends in Plant Science. 2 : 425 431.
12. Hall RD. 2005. Plant metabolomics: from holistic hope, to hype, to hot topic. New Phytologist 169 : 453 468.
13. Hannah MA, Wiese D, Freund S, Fiehn O, Heyer AG, Hincha DK. 2006. Natural genetic variation of freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiology 142 : 98 112.
14. Heidel AJ, Clauss MJ, Kroymann J, Savolainen O, Mitchell-Olds T. 2006. Natural variation in MAM within and between populations of Arabidopsis lyrata determines glucosinolate phenotype. Genetics 173 : 1629 1636.
15. Hoffmann MH. 2005. Evolution of the realized climatic niche in the genus Arabidopsis (Brassicaceae). Evolution 59 : 1425 1436.
16. Jonsell B, Kustås K, Nordal I. 1995. Genetic variation in Arabis petraea, a disjunct species in northern Europe. Ecography 18 : 321 332.
17. Jump AS, Peñuelas J. 2005. Running to stand still: adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change. Ecology Letters 8 : 1010 1020.
18. Kaplan F, Kopka J, Haskell DW, Zhao W, Schiller KC, Gatzke N, Sung DY, Guy CL. 2004. Exploring the temperature-stress metabolome of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 136 : 4159 4168.
19. Keurentjes JJB, Fu J, Ric de Vos CH, Lommen A, Hall RD, Bino RJ, van der Plas LHW, Jansen RC, Vreugdenhil D, Koornneef M. 2006. The genetics of plant metabolism. Nature Genetics 38 : 842 849.
20. Kliebenstein DJ, Kroymann J, Brown P, Figuth A, Pedersen D, Gershenzon J, Mitchell-Olds T. 2001. Genetic control of natural variation in Arabidopsis glucosinolate accumulation. Plant Physiology 126 : 811 825.
21. Lam HM, Coschigano K, Schultz C, Melo-Oliveira R, Tjaden G, Oliveira I, Ngai N, Hsieh MH, Coruzzi G. 1995. Use of Arabidopsis mutants and genes to study amide amino acid biosynthesis. Plant Cell 7 : 887 898.
22. Mandák B, Bímova K, Plačková I, Mahelka V, Chrtek J. 2005. Loss of genetic variation in geographically marginal populations of Atriplex tatarica (Chenopodiaceae). Annals of Botany. 96 : 901 912.
23. Mitchell-Olds T. 2001. Arabidopsis thaliana and its wild relatives: a model system for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 16 : 693 700.
24. Morrison N, Bearden D, Bundy J, Collette T, Currie F, Davey MP, Haigh NS, Hancock D, Jones O, Rochfort S, Sansone SA, Štys D, Teng Q, Field D, Viant M. 2007. Standard reporting requirements for biological samples in metabolomics experiments: environmental context. Metabolomics 3 : 203 210.
25. Nikolau B, Fiehn O, Rhee S, Dickerson J, Lange M, Lane G, Roessner U, Ward J, Last R, Chapple C, Hardy N. 2006. Plant Biology Context minimum reporting requirements. http://msi-workgroups.sourceforge.net/bio-metadata/.
26. Overy SA, Walker HJ, Malone S, Howard TP, Baxter CJ, Sweetlove LJ, Hill SA, Quick WP. 2005. Application of metabolite profiling to the identification of traits in a population of tomato introgression lines. Journal of Experimental Botany 56 : 287 296.
27. Pamilo P, Savolainen O. 1999. Post-glacial colonization, drift, local selection and conservation value of populations: a northern perspective. Hereditas 130 : 229 238.
28. Rask L, Andréasson E, Ekbom B, Eriksson S, Pontoppidan B, Meijer J. 2000. Myrosinase: gene family evolution and herbivore defense in Brassicaceae. Plant Molecular Biology 42 : 93 113.
29. Roessner U, Luedemann A, Brust D, Fiehn O, Linke T, Willmitzer L, Ferniw AR. 2001. Metabolic profiling allows comprehensive phenotyping of genetically or environmentally modified plant systems. Plant Cell 13 : 11 29.
30. Smirnoff N. 1998. Plant resistance to environmental stress. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 9 : 214 219.
31. Stitt M, Hurry V. 2002. A plant for all seasons: alterations in photosynthetic carbon metabolism during cold acclimation in Arabidopsis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 5 : 199 206.
32. Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M, Beaumont LJ, Collingham YC, Erasmus BFN, Ferreira de Siqueira M, Grainger A, Hannah L, Hughes L, Huntley BS, van Jaarsveld A, Midgley GF, Miles L, Ortega-Huerta MA, Peterson AT, Phillips OL, Williams SE. 2004. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427 : 145 148.
33. Trygg J, Holmes E, Lundstedt T. 2007. Chemometrics in metabolomics. Journal of Proteome Research 6 : 469 479.
34. Windsor AJ, Reichelt M, Figuth A, Svatoš A, Kroymann J, Kliebenstein DJ, Gershenzon J, Mitchell-Olds T. 2005. Geographic and evolutionary diversification of glucosinolates among near relatives of Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaeae). Phytochemistry 66 : 1321 1333.