Application of metabolite profiling to the identification of traits in a population of tomato introgression lines

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 56, Issue 410, 2005, Pages 287-296

  Overy, S A ^a   Walker, H J ^a   Malone, S ^a   Howard, T P ^a   Baxter, C J ^b   Sweetlove, L J ^b   Hill, S A ^b   Quick, W P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Introgression; Profiling; Tomato

Indexed keywords

CROPS; GENES; MASS SPECTROMETRY; ORGANIC ACIDS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SUGARS;

AGRONOMIC VALUES; FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS; INTROGRESSION LINES; TIME-OF-FLIGHT MASS SPECTROMETRY;

METABOLITES;

CHEMISTRY; CONFERENCE PAPER; ELECTROSPRAY MASS SPECTROMETRY; FRUIT; GENETICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TOMATO;

FRUIT; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PHENOTYPE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SPECTROMETRY, MASS, ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION;

FARM CROPS; GENES; MASS SPECTROMETERS; METABOLISM; ORGANIC ACIDS; SUGARS;

LYCOPERSICON; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON PENNELLII;

EID: 13244259596     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eri070     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Allen J, Davey HM, Broadhurst D, Heald JK, Rowland JJ, Oliver SG, Kell DB. 2003. High-throughput classification of yeast mutants for functional genomics using metabolic footprinting. Nature Biotechnology 21, 692-696.
2. Allen Stevens M, Rick CM. 1986. Genetics and breeding. In: Atherton JG, Rudich J, eds. The tomato crop. A scientific basis for improvement. Chapman and Hall, 35-109.
3. Alpert KB, Tanksley SD. 1996. High-resolution mapping and isolation of a yeast artificial chromosome contig containing fw2.2: a major fruit weight quantitative trait locus in tomato. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93, 15503-15507.
4. Eshed Y, Zamir D. 1994. Introgressions from Lycopersicon pennellii can improve the soluble-solids yield of tomato hybrids. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 88, 891-897.
5. Eshed Y, Zamir D. 1995. An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 141, 1147-1162.
6. Eshed Y, Gera G, Zamir D. 1996. A genome-wide search for wild species alleles that increase horticultural yield of processing tomatoes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 93, 877-886.
7. Fray RG, Grierson D. 1993. Identification and genetic-analysis of normal and mutant phytoene synthase genes of tomato by sequencing, complementation and co-suppression. Plant Molecular Biology 22, 589-602
8. Fridman E, Pleban T, Zamir D. 2000. A recombination hotspot delimits a wild-species quantitative trait locus for tomato sugar content to 484 bp within an invertase gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97, 4718-4723.
9. Fridman E, Zamir D. 2003. Functional divergence of a syntenic invertase genen family in tomato, potato, and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 131, 603-609.
10. Fulton TM, Bucheli P, Voirol E, Lopez J, Petiard V, Tanksley SD. 2002. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) affecting sugars, organic acids and other biochemical properties possibly contributing to flavour, identified in four advanced backcross populations of tomato. Euphytica 127, 163-177.
11. Gidman E, Goodacre R, Emmett B, Smith AR, Gwynn-Jones D. 2003. Investigating plant-plant interference by metabolic footprinting. Phytochemistry 63, 705-710.
12. Goodacre R, Vaidyanathan S, Bianchi G, Kell DB. 2002. Metabolic profiling using direct infusion electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for the characterization of olive oils. The Analyst 127, 1457-1462.
13. Goodacre R, York EV, Heald JK, Scott IM. 2003. Chemometric discrimination of unfractionated plant extracts analyzed by electrospray mass spectrometry. Phytochemistry 62, 859-863.
14. Gur A, Semel Y, Cahaner A, Zamir D. 2004. Real time QTL of complex phenotypes in tomato interspecific introgression lines. Trends in Plant Science 9, 107-109.
15. Holtan HEE, Hake S. 2003. Quantitative trait locus analysis of leaf dissection in tomato lines using Lycopersicon pennellii segmental introgression lines. Genetics 165, 1541-1550.
16. Johnson HE, Broadhurst D, Goodacre R, Smith AR. 2003. Metabolic fingerprinting of salt-stressed tomatoes. Phytochemistry 62, 919-928.
17. Liu Y-S, Gur A, Ronen G, Causse M, Damidaux R, Buret M, Hirschberg J, Zamir D. 2003. There is more to tomato fruit colour that candidate carotenoid genes. Plant Biotechnology Journal 1, 195-207.
18. Monforte AJ, Friedman E, Zamir D, Tanksley SD. 2001. Comparison of a set of allelic QTL-NILs for chromosome 4 of tomato: deductions about natural variation and implications for germplasm utilization. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 102, 572-590.
19. Morandini P, Salamini F. 2003. Plant biotechnology and breeding: allied for years to come. Trends in Plant Science 8, 70-75.
20. Paran I, Zamir D. 2003. Quantitative traits in plants: beyond the QTL. Trends in Genetics 19, 303-306.
21. Ronen G, Carmel-Goren L, Zamir D, Hirschberg J. 2000. An alternative pathway to β-carotene formation in plant chromoplasts discovered by map-based cloning of Beta and old-gold color mutations in tomato. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97, 11102-11107.
22. Sweetlove LJ, Last RL, Fernie AR. 2003. Predictive metabolic engineering: a goal for systems biology. Plant Physiology 132, 420-425.
23. Tadmor Y, Fridman E, Gur A, Larkov O, Lastochkin E, Ravid U, Zamir D, Lewinsohn E. 2002. Identification of malodorous, a wild species allele affecting tomato aroma that was selected against during domestication. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50, 2005-2009.
24. Trethewey R. 2004. Metabolite profiling as an aid to metabolic engineering in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 7, 196-201.
25. Vaidyanathan S, Kell DB, Goodacre R. 2002. Flow-injection electrospray ionization mass spectrometry of crude cell extracts for high-throughput bacterial identification. Journal of the American Society of Mass Spectrometry 13, 118-128.
26. Valle EM, Boggio SB, Heldt HW. 1998. Free amino acid composition of phloem sap and growing fruit of Lycopersicon esculentum. Plant and Cell Physiology 39, 458-461.
27. Yates HE, Frary A, Doganlar S, Frampton A, Eannetta NT, Uhlig J, Tanksley SD. 2004. Comparative fine mapping of fruit quality QTLs on chromosome 4 introgressions derived from two wild tomato species. Euphytica 135, 283-296.
28. Zamir D. 2001. Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nature Reviews Genetics 2, 983-989.