Lessons in molecular recognition. 2. Assessing and improving cross-docking accuracy

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 2293-2302

  Sutherland, Jeffrey J ^a   Nandigam, Ravi K ^b   Erickson, Jon A ^a   Vieth, Michal ^a  

^a ELI LILLY AND COMPANY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOCKING; LIGANDS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PROTEINS; X RAYS;

CROSS-DOCKING ACCURACY; HORMONE RECEPTOR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METABOLISM; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN BINDING; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; LIGANDS; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 37249031360     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci700253h     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Kitchen, D. B.; Decornez, H.; Furr, J. R.; Bajorath, J. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2004, 3 (11), 935-949.
2. Leach, A. R.; Shoichet, B. K.; Peishoff, C. E. Prediction of proteinligand interactions. Docking and scoring: successes and gaps. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49 (20), 5851-5855.
3. Lengauer, T.; Lemmen, C.; Rarey, M.; Zimmermann, M. Novel technologies for virtual screening. Drug Discovery Today 2004, 9 (1), 27-34.
4. Scapin, G. Structural biology and drug discovery. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2006, 12 (17), 2087-2097.
5. Chen, H.; Lyne, P. D.; Giordanetto, F.; Lovell, T.; Li, J. On evaluating molecular-docking methods for pose prediction and enrichment factors. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46 (1), 401-415.
6. Kontoyianni, M.; McClellan, L. M.; Sokol, G. S. Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47 (3), 558-565.
7. Perola, E.; Walters, W. P.; Charifson, P. S. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance. Proteins 2004, 56 (2), 235-249.
8. Warren, G. L.; Andrews, C. W.; Capelli, A. M.; Clarke, B.; LaLonde, J.; Lambert, M. H.; Lindvall, M.; Nevins, N.; Semus, S. F.; Senger, S.; Tedesco, G.; Wall, I. D.; Woolven, J. M.; Peishoff, C. E.; Head, M. S. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49 (20), 5912-5931.
9. Erickson, J. A.; Jalaie, M.; Robertson, D. H.; Lewis, R. A.; Vieth, M. Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47 (1), 45-55.
10. Murray, C. W.; Baxter, C. A.; Frenkel, A. D. The sensitivity of the results of molecular docking to induced fit effects: application to thrombin, thermolysin and neuraminidase. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1999, 13 (6), 547-562.
11. Wu, G.; Robertson, D. H.; Brooks, C. L., Ill; Vieth, M. Detailed analysis of grid-based molecular docking: A case study of CDOCKER-A CHARMm-based MD docking algorithm. J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 24(13), 1549-1562.
12. McGann, M. R.; Almond, H. R.; Nicholls, A.; Grant, J. A.; Brown, F. K. Gaussian docking functions. Biopolymers 2003, 68 (1), 76-90.
13. Rush, T. S., III; Grant, J. A.; Mosyak, L.; Nicholls, A. A shapebased 3-D scaffold hopping method and its application to a bacterial protein-protein interaction. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48 (5), 1489-1495.
14. Swindells, M. B.; Overington, J. P. Prioritizing the proteome: identifying pharmaceutically relevant targets. Drug Discovery Today 2002, 7(9), 516-521.
15. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28 (1), 235-242.
16. Maestro, version 7.5; Schrodinger, Inc.: New York, 2006.
17. Corina, version 3.2; Molecular Networks GmbH: Erlangen, Germany, 2005.
18. Altschul, S. F.; Madden, T. L.; Schaffer, A. A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D. J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25 (17), 3389-3402.
19. Canutescu, A. A.; Shelenkov, A. A.; Dunbrack, R. L., Jr. A graphtheory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci. 2003, 12(9), 2001-2014.
20. Brooks, B. R.; Bruccoleri, R. E.; Olafson, B. D.; States, D. J.; Swaminathan, S.; Karplus, M. CHARMM: A Program for Macromolecular Energy, Minimization, and Dynamics Calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 1983, 4, 187-217.
21. LSQMAN, version 9.6.2; Uppsala Software Factory: http://xray.bmc.uu.se/usf/ (accessed Aug 31, 2007).
22. Lamoureux, G.; Roux, B. Absolute Hydration Free Energy Scale for Alkali and Halide Ions Established from Simulations with a Polarizable Force Field. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110 (7), 3308-3322.
23. Daylight, version 4.8.1 ; Daylight Chemical Information Systems: Aliso Viejo, CA, 2003.
24. Discovery Studio; Accelrys: San Diego, CA, 2007.
25. OpenEye applications, version 2.1; OpenEye Scientific Software, Inc.: Santa Fe, NM, 2005.
26. Bostrom, J.; Greenwood, J. R.; Gottfries, J. Assessing the performance of OMEGA with respect to retrieving bioactive conformations. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2003, 21 (5), 449-62.
27. Cole, J. C.; Murray, C. W.; Nissink, J. W.; Taylor, R. D.; Taylor, R., Comparing protein-ligand docking programs is difficult. Proteins 2005, 60 (3), 325-32.
28. Cavasotto, C. N.; Abagyan, R. A. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 337 (1), 209-25.
29. Wang, R.; Fang, X.; Lu, Y.; Yang, C. Y.; Wang, S. The PDBbind database: methodologies and updates. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48 (12), 4111-4119.
30. Rarey, M.; Kramer, B.; Lengauer, T.; Klebe, G. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 261 (3), 470-489.
31. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R. C.; Leach, A. R.; Taylor, R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267 (3), 727-748.
32. JMP, version 5.1.1; SAS Institute: Cary, NC, 2004.
33. Friesner, R. A.; Banks, J. L.; Murphy, R. B.; Halgren, T. A.; Klicic, J. J.; Mainz, D. T.; Repasky, M. P.; Knoll, E. H.; Shelley, M.; Perry, J. K.; Shaw, D. E.; Francis, P.; Shenkin, P. S. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47 (7), 1739-1749.
34. Kamper, A.; Apostolakis, J.; Rarey, M.; Marian, C. M.; Lengauer, T. Fully automated flexible docking of ligands into flexible synthetic receptors using forward and inverse docking strategies. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46 (2), 903-911.
35. Sherman, W.; Day, T.; Jacobson, M. P.; Friesner, R. A.; Farid, R. Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49 (2), 534-553.
36. Mizutani, M. Y.; Takamatsu, Y.; Ichinose, T.; Nakamura, K.; Itai, A. Effective handling of induced-fit motion in flexible docking. Proteins 2006, 63 (4), 878-891.
37. Meiler, J.; Baker, D., ROSETTALIGAND: protein-small molecule docking with full side-chain flexibility. Proteins 2006, 65 (3), 538-548.