Homology as a parsimony problem: A dynamic homology approach for morphological data

Cladistics

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 588-612

  Ramírez, Martín J ^a  

^a MUSEO ARGENTINO DE CIENCIAS NATURALES BERNARDINO RIVADAVIA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; CLADISTICS; COPULATION; CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS; HOMOLOGY; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; MORPHOLOGY; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; RECONSTRUCTION; SCLERITE; SPIDER;

ANYPHAENIDAE; ARACHNIDA; ARANEAE;

EID: 36949022247     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: 10960031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00162.x     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Agnarsson, I., 2004. Morphological phylogeny of cobweb spiders and their relatives (Araneae, Araneoidea, Theridiidae). Zool. J. Linnean Soc. 141, 447 626.
2. Alberch, P., Gale, E., 1985. A developmental analysis of an evolutionary trend: digital reductions in amphibians. Evolution 39, 8 23.
3. Bhatnagar, R.D., Rempel, J.G., 1962. The structure, function, and postembryonic development of the male and female copulatory organs of the black widow spider Latrodectus curacaviensis (Müller). Can. J. Zool. 40, 465 510.
4. Burke, A.C., Nelson, C.E., Morgan, B.A., Tabin, C., 1995. Hox genes and the evolution of vertebrate axial morphology. Development 121, 333 346.
5. Coddington, J.A., 1990. Ontogeny and homology in the male palpus of orb-weaving spiders and their relatives, with comments on phylogeny (Araneoclada: Araneoidea, Deinopoidea). Smithson. Contrib. Zool. 496, 1 52.
6. Collazo, A., 2000. Developmental variation, homology, and the pharyngula stage. Syst. Biol. 49, 3 18.
7. Cracraft, J., 2005. Phylogeny and evo-devo: characters, homology, and the historical analysis of the evolution of development. Zoology (Jena) 108, 345 356.
8. De Laet, J., 2005. Parsimony and the problem of inapplicables in sequence data. In : Albert, V.A. (Ed.), Parsimony, Phylogeny, and Genomics. Oxford University Press, pp. 81 118.
9. Edgecombe, G.D., Wilson, G.D.F., Colgan, D.J., Gray, M.R., Cassis, G., 2000. Arthropod cladistics: combined analysis of histone H3 and U2 snRNA sequences and morphology. Cladistics 16, 155 203.
10. Eernisse, D.J., Kluge, A.G., 1993. Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules and morphology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10, 1170 1195.
11. Feduccia, A., 1999. 1,2,3 = 2,3,4: Accommodating the cladogram. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 4740 4742.
12. Galis, F., Kundrát, M., Metz, J.A.J., 2005. Hox genes, digit identities and the theropod/bird transition. J. Exp. Zool. 304B, 198 205.
13. Ghiselin, M.T., 2006. Homology as a relation of correspondence between parts of individuals. Theor. Biosci. 124, 91 104.
14. Gilbert, S.F., Bolker, J.A., 2001. Homologies of process and modular elements of embryonic construction. J. Exp. Zool. 291, 1 12.
15. Goloboff, P.A., 1993. Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics 9, 83 91.
16. Goloboff, P.A., 1993-97. Pee-Wee: Parsimony and implied weights. Program and documentation. Published by the author, San Miguel de Tucumán (v. 3.0 for Windows).
17. Goloboff, P.A., Farris, J.S., Nixon, K.C., 2003-06. TNT: Tree analysis using new technology. Published by the authors, Tucumán, Argentina (v. 1.0 May 2006). Available at http://www.zmuc.dk/public/phylogeny.
18. Grant, T., Kluge, A.G., 2004. Transformation series as an ideographic character concept. Cladistics 20, 23 31.
19. Hawkins, J.A., 2000. A survey of primary homology assessment: different botanists perceive and define characters in different ways. In : Scotland, R.W., Pennington, R.T. (Eds Homology and Systematics: Coding Characters for Phylogenetic Analysis. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 22 53.
20. Hennig, W., 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. University Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
21. Huber, B.A., 2004. Evolutionary transformation from muscular to hydraulic movements in spider (Arachnida, Araneae) genitalia: a study based on histological serial sections. J. Morphol. 261, 364 376.
22. Hübner, C., 2006. Hox genes, homology and axis formation - The application of morphological concepts to evolutionary developmental biology. Theor. Biosci. 124, 371 396.
23. Kluge, A.G., 1999. The science of phylogenetic systematics: explanation, prediction, and test. Cladistics 15, 429 436.
24. Kluge, A.G., 2003. The repugnant and the mature in phylogenetic inference: atemporal similarity and historical identity. Cladistics 19, 356 368.
25. Kluge, A.G., Grant, T., 2006. From conviction to anti-superfluity: old and new justifications of parsimony in phylogenetic inference. Cladistics 22, 276 288.
26. Maddison, W.P., 1993. Missing data versus missing characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42, 576 581.
27. Nixon, K.C., 1999a. The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15, 407 414.
28. Nixon, K.C., 1999b. Winclada. Published by the author, Ithaca, NY (v. 1.00.04). Available at http://www.cladistics.com
29. Nixon, K.C., Carpenter, J.M., 1996. On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12, 221 241.
30. Oster, G., Alberch, P., Murray, J., Shubin, N., 1988. Evolution and morphogenetic rules: the shape of the vertebrate limb in ontogeny and phylogeny. Evolution 42, 862 884.
31. de Pinna, M.C.C., 1991. Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics 7, 367 394.
32. de Pinna, M.C.C., 1996. Comparative biology and systematics: some controversies in retrospective. J. Comp. Biol. 1, 3 16.
33. Ramírez, M.J., 2003. A cladistic generic revision of the spider subfamily Amaurobioidinae (Araneae, Anyphaenidae). Bull. Am. Mus. Natl Hist. 277, 1 262.
34. Ramírez, M.J., Ansaldi, M.J., Puglisi, A.F., 2004. Description of the females of Oxysoma itambezinho Ramírez and Monapia tandil Ramírez, and their effects on the generic relationships of Gayennini (Araneae, Anyphaenidae, Amaurobioidinae). Zootaxa 668, 1 8.
35. Richter, S., 2005. Homologies in phylogenetic analyses - concept and tests. Theor. Biosci. 124, 105 120.
36. Richter, S., Olsson, L., 2006. From evolutionary morphology to the modern synthesis and 'evo-devo': Historical and contemporary perspectives. Theor. Biosci. 124, 259 263.
37. Rieppel, O., 1996. Testing homology by congruence: the pectoral girdle of turtles. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B: Biol. Sci. 263, 1395 1398.
38. Rieppel. O., 2005. Modules, kinds and homology. J. Exp. Biol. 304B, 18 27.
39. Rieppel. O., 2006. The merits of similarity reconsidered. Syst. Biodivers. 4, 137 147.
40. Rieppel, O., Kearney, M., 2002. Similarity. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 75, 59 82.
41. Robillard, T., Legendre, F., Desutter-Grandcolas, L., Grandcolas, P., 2006. Phylogenetic analysis and alignment of behavioral sequences by direct optimization. Cladistics 22, 602 633.
42. Rutishauser, R., Moline, P., 2005. Evo-devo and the search for homology ('sameness') in biological systems. Theor. Biosci. 124, 213 241.
43. Sankoff, D., 1975. Minimal mutation trees of sequences. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 28, 35 42.
44. Sankoff, D., Cedergren, R.J., Lapalme, G., 1976. Frequency of insertion-deletion, transversion, and transition in evolution of 5S ribosomal RNA. J. Mol. Evol. 7, 133 149.
45. Sattler, R., 1984. Homology - a continuing challenge. Syst. Bot. 9, 382 394.
46. Sattler, R., 1992. Process morphology: Structural dynamics in development and evolution. Can. J. Bot. 70, 708 716.
47. Sattler, R., Rutishauer, R., 1990. Structural and dynamic descriptions of the development of Urticularia foliosa and U. australis. Can. J. Bot. 68, 1989 2003.
48. Schulmeister, S., Wheeler, W.C., 2004. Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of developmental sequences. Evol. Dev. 6, 50 57.
49. Simmons, M.P., 2004. Independence of alignment and tree search. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31, 874 879.
50. Simmons, M.P., Ochoterena, H., 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49, 369 381.
51. Stevens, P.F., 2000. On characters and character states: Do overlapping and non-overlapping variation, morphology and molecules, all yield data the same value? In : Scotland, R., Pennington, R.T. (Eds Homology and Systematics: Coding Characters for Phylogenetic Analysis. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 81 105.
52. Svensson, M.E., 2004. Homology and homocracy revisited: gene expression patterns and hypotheses of homology. Dev. Genes Evol. 214, 418 421.
53. Theißen, G., 2005. Birth, life and death of developmental control genes: new challenges for the homology concept. Theor. Biosci. 124, 199 212.
54. Vargas, A.O., Fallon, J.F., 2005a. The digits of the wing of birds are 1, 2, and 3: a review. J. Exp. Zool. 304B, 206 219.
55. Vargas, A.O., Fallon, J.F., 2005b. Birds have dinosaur wings: the molecular evidence. J. Exp. Zool. 304B, 86 90.
56. Vergara-Silva, F., 2003. Plants and the conceptual articulation of evolutionary developmental biology. Biol. Philos. 18, 249 284.
57. Wagner, G.P., 2005. The developmental evolution of avian digit homology: an update. Theor. Biosci. 124, 165 183.
58. Wagner, G.P., Gauthier, J.A., 1999. 1,2,3 = 2,3,4: A solution to the problem of the homology of the digits in the avian hand. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5111 5116.
59. Welten, M.C.M., Verbeek, F.J., Meijer, A.H., Richardson, M.K., 2005. Gene expression and digit homology in the chicken embryo wing. Evol. Dev. 7, 18 28.
60. Weston, P.H., 2000. Process morphology from a cladistic perspective. In : Scotland, R., Pennington, R.T. (Eds Homology and Systematics. Coding Characters for Phylogenetic Analysis. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 124 144.
61. Wheeler, W., 1996. Optimization alignment: the end of multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetics? Cladistics 12, 1 9.
62. Wheeler, W.C., 1999. Fixed character states and the optimization of molecular sequence data. Cladistics 15, 379 385.
63. Wheeler, W.C., 2001. Homology and the optimization of DNA sequence data. Cladistics 17, S3 S11.
64. Wheeler, W.C., 2003. Implied alignment: a synapomorphy-based multiple-sequence alignment method and its use in cladogram search. Cladistics 19, 261 268.
65. Wheeler, W.C., Aagesen, L., Arango, C.P., Faivovich, J., Grant, T., D'Haese, C., Janies, D., Smith, W.L., Varon, V., Giribet, G., 2006. Dynamic Homology and Phylogenetic Systematics: A Unified Approach Using POY. American Museum of Natural History Press, New York.