Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of developmental sequences

Evolution and Development

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 50-57

  Schulmeister, Susanne ^a   Wheeler, Ward C ^a  

^a DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; TIME;

ANIMALS; EMBRYONIC AND FETAL DEVELOPMENT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY; TIME FACTORS;

ANIMALIA; INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 1042290602     PISSN: 1520541X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2004.04005.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alberch, P., and Blanco, M. J. 1996. Evolutionary patterns in ontogenetic transformation: from laws to regularities. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 40: 845-858.
2. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Jeffery, J. E., Coates, M. I., and Richardson, M. K. 2002. From Haeckel to event-pairing: the evolution of developmental sequences. Theory Biosci. 121: 297-320.
3. Blanco, M. J., and Sanchiz, B. 2000. Evolutionary mechanisms of rib loss in anurans: a comparative developmental approach. J. Morphol. 244: 57-67.
4. Chipman, A. D., Haas, A., Tchernov, E., and Khaner, O. 2000. Variation in anuran embryogenesis: differences in sequence and timing of early developmental events. J. Exp. Zool. Mol. Dev. Evol. 288: 352-365.
5. Farris, J. S. 1970. Methods for computing Wagner trees. Syst. Zool. 19: 83-92.
6. Fitch, W. M. 1971. Towards defining the course of evolution: minimal change for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 20: 406-416.
7. Godfrey, L. R., and Sutherland, M. R. 1995. What's growth got to do with it? Process and product in the evolution of ontogeny. J. Human Evol. 29: 405-431.
8. Gould, S. J. 2000. Of coiled oysters and big brains: how to rescue the terminology of heterochrony, now gone astray. Evol. Dev. 2: 241-248.
9. Jeffery, J. E., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Coates, M. I., and Richardson, M. K. 2002a. Analyzing evolutionary patterns in amniote embryonic development. Evol. Dev. 4: 292-302.
10. Jeffery, J. E., Richardson, M. K., Coates, M. I., and Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. 2002b. Analyzing developmental sequences within a phylogenetic framework. Syst. Biol. 51: 478-491.
11. Klingenberg, C. P. 1998. Heterochrony and allometry: the analysis of evolutionary change in ontogeny. Biol. Rev. 73: 79-123.
12. Kluge, A. G., and Farris, J. S. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 18: 1-32.
13. Koenemann, S., and Sehram, F. 2002. The limitations of ontogenetic data in phylogenetic analyses. Contr. Zool. 71 (1/3): 47-65.
14. Kovác, V. 2002. Synchrony and heterochrony in ontogeny (of fish). J. Theor. Biol. 217:499-507.
15. Mabee, P. M., and Humphries, J. 1993. Coding polymorphic data: examples from allozymes and ontogeny. Syst. Biol. 42: 166-181.
16. Mabee, P. M., and Trendler, T. A. 1996. Development of the cranium and paired fins in Betta splendens: intraspecific variation and interspecific comparisons. J. Morphol. 227: 249-287.
17. Maisano, J. 2002. The potential utility of postnatal skeletal developmental patterns in squamate phylogenetics. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 136: 277-313.
18. Nunn, C. L., and Smith, K. K. 1998. Statistical analyses of developmental sequences: the craniofacial region in marsupial and placental mammals. Am. Nat. 152: 82-101.
19. Raff, R. A., and Wray, G. A. 1989. Heterochrony: developmental mechanisms and evolutionary results. J. Evol. Biol. 2: 409-434.
20. Reiss, J. O. 2002. The phylogeny of amphibian metamorphosis. Zoology 105: 85-96.
21. Richardson, M. K., and Chipman, A. D. 2003. Developmental constraints in a comparative framework: a test case using variations in phalanx number during amniote evolution. J. Exp. Zool. Mol. Dev. Evol. 296: 8-22.
22. Richardson, M. K., Jeffery, J. E., Coates, M. I., and Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. 2001. Comparative methods in developmental biology. Zoology 104: 278-283.
23. Sanchez-Villagra, M. R. 2002. Comparative patterns of postcranial ontogeny in therian mammals: an analysis of relative timing of ossification events. J. Exp. Zool. Mol. Dev. Evol. 294: 264-273.
24. Sankoff, D., and Rousseau, P. 1975. Locating the vertices of a Steiner tree in arbitrary space. Math. Progr. 9: 240-246.
25. Smith, K. K. 1996. Integration of craniofacial structures during development in mammals. Am. Zool. 36: 70-79.
26. Smith, K. K. 1997. Comparative patterns of craniofacial development in eutherian and metatherian mammals. Evolution 51: 1663-1678.
27. Smith, K. K. 2001. Heterochrony revisited: the evolution of developmental sequences. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 73: 169-186.
28. Smith, K. K. 2002. Sequence heterochrony and the evolution of development. J. Morph. 252: 82-97.
29. Velhagen, W. A. 1995. A comparative study of cranial development in the thamnophiine snakes (Serpentes: Colubridae). Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University, Durham. North Carolina.
30. Velhagen, W. A. 1997. Analyzing developmental sequences using sequence units. Syst. Biol. 46: 204-210.
31. Wheeler, W. C. 1999. Fixed character states and the optimization of molecular sequence data. Cladistics 15: 379-385.
32. Wheeler, W. C. 2003. Search-based optimization. Cladistics 19: 348-355.
33. Wheeler, W. C., Gladstein, D. S., and De Laet, J. 2002. POY. Version 3.0. Source code and binaries available at ftp.amnh.org/pub/molecular/poy. Documentation by D. Janies and W. Wheeler.