Molecular phylogeny of the tree-of-heaven family (simaroubaceae) based on chloroplast and nuclear markers

International Journal of Plant Sciences

Volumn 168, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1325-1339

  Clayton, Joshua W ^a   Fernando, Edwino S ^b   Soltis, Pamela S ^c   Soltis, Douglas E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES LOS BAÑOS   (Philippines)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayes factors; Partitioning strategies; Phylogeny; Simaroubaceae; Systematics

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CHLOROPLAST; CLADISTICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DICOTYLEDON; GENETIC MARKER; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; PLASTID; TAXONOMY;

AILANTHUS ALTISSIMA; AMARORIA; BRUCEA; CASTELA; HOLACANTHA; LEITNERIA; PICRASMA; QUASSIA; SAPINDALES; SIMAROUBACEAE;

EID: 36849052275     PISSN: 10585893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/521796     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Akaike H 1974 A new look at statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automatic Control 19:716-723.
2. Alfaro ME, S Zoller, F Lutzoni 2003 Bayes or bootstrap? a simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Mol Biol Evol 20:255-266.
3. APG II 2003 An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot J Linn Soc 141:399-436.
4. Aubréville A, F Pellegrin 1937 Gymnostemon A. et P., genre nouveau de la Côte d'Ivoire, voisin d'un endémique de Madagascar. Bull Soc Bot Fr 84:181-184.
5. Backer CA, RCB Van den Brink 1965 Flora of Java. Vol II. Angiospermae, families 111-160. Noordhoff, Groningen.
6. Barker FK, FM Lutzoni 2002 The utility of the incongruence length difference test. Syst Biol 51:625-637.
7. Basak RK 1967 Studies on the pollen morphology of Simaroubaceae. Bull Bot Surv India 9:63-67.
8. Bennett AW 1872 Simarubeae. Pages 517-523 in JD Hooker, ed. Flora of British India. Vol 1. Ranunculaceae to Sapindaceae. Reeve, London.
9. Bergsten J 2005 A review of long-branch attraction. Cladistics 21:163-193.
10. Brandley MC, A Schmitz, TW Reeder 2005 Partitioned Bayesian analyses, partition choice, and the phylogenetic relationships of scincid lizards. Syst Biol 54:373-390.
11. Cavalcante P 1983 Revisão taxonômica do gênero Simaba Aublet (Simaroubaceae) na América do Sul. Publicações Avulsas do Museu Goeldi 37. Belém, Pará, Brasil.
12. Chase MW, CM Morton, JA Kallunki 1999 Phylogenetic relationships of Rutaceae: a cladistic analysis of the subfamilies using evidence from rbcL and atpB sequence variation. Am J Bot 86:1191-1199.
13. Corbett SL, SR Manchester 2004 Phytogeography and fossil history of Ailanthus (Simaroubaceae). Int J Plant Sci 165:671-690.
14. Cronquist A 1944a Studies in the Simaroubaceae. I. The genus Castela. J Arnold Arbor Harv Univ 25:122-128.
15. _ 1944b Studies in the Simaroubaceae. II. The genus Simarouba. Bull Torrey Bot Club 71:226-234.
16. _ 1944c Studies in the Simaroubaceae. III. The genus Simaba. Lloydia 7:81-92.
17. _ 1944d Studies in the Simaroubaceae. IV. Resume of American genera. Brittonia 5:128-147.
18. _ 1981 An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
19. Cummings MP, SA Handley, DS Myers, DL Reed, A Rokas, K Winka 2003 Comparing bootstrap and posterior probability values in the four-taxon case. Syst Biol 52:477-487.
20. Darlu P, G Lecointre 2002 When does the incongruence length difference test fail? Mol Biol Evol 19:432-437.
21. Da Silva MFDGF, OR Gottlieb 1987 Evolution of quassinoids and limonoids in the Rutales. Biochem Syst Ecol 15:85-103.
22. Davis, CC, CD Bell, S Mathews, MJ Donoghue 2002 Laurasian migration explains Gondwanan disjunctions: evidence from Malpighiaceae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:6833-6837.
23. Dorofeev PI 1994 Leitneria. Pages 8-12, plates 47-55 in L Budantsev, ed. Fossil flowering plants of Russia and adjacent states. Vol 3. Leitneriaceae-Juglandaceae. Kamarov Botanical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg.
24. Doyle JJ, JL Doyle 1990 Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13-15.
25. Engler A 1874 Simaroubaceae. Pages 197-246, tabs. 40-46 in CFP de Martius, I Urban, eds. Flora Brasiliensis. Vol 12(2). Frid. Fleischer in comm., Lipsiae.
26. _ 1905 Anacardiaceae africanae III. Bot Jahrb Syst 36:216-217.
27. _ 1931 Simarubaceae. Pages 359-405 in A Engler, K Prantl, eds. Die natürlichen Planzenfamilien. Vol 19a. 2nd ed. Engelmann, Leipzig.
28. Erixon P, B Svennblad, T Britton, B Oxelman 2003 Reliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics. Syst Biol 52:665-673.
29. Farris, JS, M Kallersjo, AG Kluge, C Bult 1994 Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315-319.
30. Felsenstein J 1985 Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
31. Fernando ES, PA Gadek, CJ Quinn 1995 Simaroubaceae, an artificial construct: evidence from rbcL sequence variation. Am J Bot 82:92-103.
32. Fernando ES, CJ Quinn 1992 Pericarp anatomy and systematics of the Simaroubaceae s.l. Aust J Bot 40:263-289.
33. _ 1995 Picramniaceae, a new family, and recircumscription of Simaroubaceae. Taxon 44:177-181.
34. Feuillet C 1983 Le statut des genres Quassia L., Samadera Gaertn., Simaba Aubl. et Simarouba Aubl. (Simaroubaceae). Bull Jard Bot Nat Belg 53:510-511.
35. Franceschinelli EV, WW Thomas 2000 Simaba guianensis subsp. huberi, a new Venezuelan taxon of Simaroubaceae. Brittonia 52:311-314.
36. Gadek PA, ES Fernando, CJ Quinn, SB Hoot, T Terrazas, MC Sheahan, MW Chase 1996 Sapindales: molecular delimitation and infraordinal groups. Am J Bot 83:802-811.
37. Graybeal A 1998 Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Syst Biol 47:9-17.
38. Hedtke SM, TM Townsend, DM Hillis 2006 Resolution of phylogenetic conflict in large data sets by increased taxon sampling. Syst Biol 55:522-529.
39. Hewson HJ 1985 Simaroubaceae. Pages 188-197 in AS George, ed. Flora of Australia. Vol 25. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
40. Hipp AL, JC Hall, KJ Sytsma 2004 Congruence versus phylogenetic accuracy: revisiting the incongruence length difference test. Syst Biol 53:81-89.
41. Hoot SB, A Culham, PR Crane 1995 The utility of atpB gene sequences in resolving phylogenetic relationships: comparison with rbcL and 18S ribosomal DNA sequences in the Lardizabalaceae. Ann Mo Bot Gard 82:194-207.
42. Huelsenbeck JP, JJ Bull, CW Cunningham 1996 Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol Evol 11:152-158.
43. Huelsenbeck JP, F Ronquist 2001 MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
44. Hutchinson J, JM Dalziel 1954 Flora of west tropical Africa. Vol 1. 2nd ed. Crown, London.
45. Johnson LA, DE Soltis 1998 Assessing congruence: empirical examples from molecular data. Pages 297-348 in DE Soltis, PS Soltis, JJ Doyle, eds. Molecular systematics of plants. II. DNA sequencing. Kluwer, Norwell, MA.
46. Judd WS, CS Campbell, EA Kellogg, PF Stevens, MJ Donoghue 2002 Plant systematics: a phylogenetic approach. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
47. Källersjö M, JS Farris, MW Chase, B Bremer, MF Fay, CJ Humphries, G Petersen, O Seberg, K Bremer 1998 Simultaneous parsimony jackknife analysis of 2538 rbcL DNA sequences reveals support for major clades of green plants, land plants, and flowering plants. Plant Syst Evol 213:259-287.
48. Kass RE, AE Raftery 1995 Bayes factors. J Am Stat Assoc 90:773-795.
49. Kathriarachchi H, P Hoffmann, R Samuel, KJ Wurdack, MW Chase 2005 Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthaceae inferred from five genes (plastid atpB, matK, 3′ndhF, rbcL, and nuclear PHYC). Mol Phylogenet Evol 36:112-134.
50. Kelchner SA, Thomas MA 2007 Model use in phylogenetics: nine key questions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:87-94.
51. Lecointre G, H Philippe, HL Van Le, H Guyader 1993 Species sampling has a major impact on phylogenetic inference. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2:205-224.
52. Lemmon AR, Moriarty EC 2004 The importance of proper model assumption in Bayesian phylogenetics. Syst Biol 53:265-277.
53. Lewis PO, MT Holder, KE Holsinger 2005 Polytomies and Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Syst Biol 54:241-253.
54. Mabberley D 1997 The plant book. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
55. Mathews S, M Lavin, RA Sharrock 1995 Evolution of the phytochrome gene family and its utility for phylogenetic analyses of angiosperms. Ann Mo Bot Gard 82:296-321.
56. Muellner AN, R Samuel, SA Johnson, M Cheek, TD Pennington, MW Chase 2003 Molecular phylogenetics of Meliaceae (Sapindales) based on nuclear and plastid DNA sequences. Am J Bot 90:471-480.
57. Muellner AN, V Savolainen, R Samuel, MW Chase 2006 The mahogany family "out-of-Africa": divergence time estimation, global biogeographic patterns inferred from plastid rbcL DNA sequences, extant, and fossil distribution of diversity. Mol Phylogenet Evol 40:236-250.
58. Nooteboom HP 1962a Generic delimitation in Simaroubaceae tribus Simaroubeae and a conspectus of the genus Quassia L. Blumea 11:509-528.
59. _ 1962b Simaroubaceae. Flora Malesiana. Ser I. 6:193-226.
60. _ 1987 Laumoniera, a new genus of Simaroubaceae from Sumatra. Blumea 32:383-384.
61. Nylander JAA, F Ronquist, JP Huelsenbeck, JL Nieves-Aldrey 2004 Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Syst Biol 53:47-67.
62. Olmstead RG, JA Sweere 1994 Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: an empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Syst Biol 43:467-481.
63. Perrier de la Bathie H 1950 Simarubacées. Pages 1-7 in H Humbert, ed. Flore de Madagascar. Vol 105. Didot, Paris.
64. Pierre L 1896 Plantes du Gabon. Bull Soc Linn Paris 2:1236.
65. Porter DM 1973 Flora of Panama, family 90, Simaroubaceae. Ann Mo Bot Gard 60:23-39.
66. Posada D, TR Buckley 2004 Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of Akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst Biol 53:793-808.
67. Posada D, KA Crandall 1998 MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
68. Rambaut A, AJ Drummond 2003 Tracer. Ver 1.3. http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/.
69. Rannala B 2002 Identifiability of parameters in MCMC Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst Biol 51:754-760.
70. Ronquist F, JP Huelsenbeck 2003 MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.
71. Roubik DW, NM Holbrook, GV Parra 1985 Roles of nectar robbers in reproduction of the tropical treelet Quassia amara (Simaroubaceae). Oecologia 66:161-167.
72. Saarela JM, HS Rai, JA Doyle, PK Endress, S Mathews, AD Marchant, BG Briggs, SW Graham 2007 Hydatellaceae identified as a new branch near the base of the angiosperm phylogenetic tree. Nature 446:312-315.
73. Savolainen V, MW Chase, SB Hoot, CM Morton, DE Soltis, C Bayer, MF Fay, AY de Bruijn, S Sullivan, Y-L Qiu 2000b Phylogenetics of flowering plants based on a combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Syst Biol 49:306-362.
74. Soltis DE, PS Soltis, MW Chase, ME Mort, DC Albach, M Zanis, V Savolainen, et al 2000 Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot J Linn Soc 133:381-461.
75. Soltis DE, PS Soltis, ME Mort, MW Chase, V Savolainen, SB Hoot, CM Morton 1998 Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: an empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for angiosperms. Syst Biol 47:32-43.
76. Stevens PF 2006 Angiosperm phylogeny website. Ver 7. http://www.mobot. org/MOBOT/research/APweb/.
77. Sullivan J 1996 Combining data with different distributions of among-site rate variation. Syst Biol 45:375-380.
78. Sullivan J, P Joyce 2005 Model selection in phylogenetics. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:445-466.
79. Suzuki Y, GV Glazko, M Nei 2002 Overcredibility of molecular phylogenetics obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:16138-16143.
80. Swofford DS 2002 Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Ver 4.0b10. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
81. Takhtajan A 1996 Diversity and classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
82. Teodoridis V, Z Kvacek 2005 The extinct genus Chaneya Wang et Manchester in the Tertiary of Europe: a revision of Porana-like fruit remains from Öhningen and Bohemia. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 134:85-103.
83. Thomas WW 1985 The Simaba guianensis complex in northern South America. Acta Amazonica 15(suppl):71-79.
84. Thompson J, T Gibson, F Plewniak, F Jeanmougin, D Higgins 1997 The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignments aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876-4882.
85. Trelease W 1895 Leitneria floridana. Rept Mo Bot Garden 6:1-26, pls 30-44.
86. Van der Veken P 1960 Nothospondias Engl. Simaroubaceae africaine meconnue. Bull Jard Bot Etat Bruxelles 30:105-109.
87. Wang Y, SR Manchester 2000 Chaneya, a new genus of winged fruit from the Tertiary of North America and Eastern Asia. Int J Plant Sci 161:167-178.
88. Wilson PG, MM O'Brien, MM Heslewood, CJ Quinn 2005 Relationships within Myrtaceae sensu lato based on a matK phylogeny. Plant Syst Evol 251:3-19.
89. Zerega NJC, WL Clement, SL Datwyler, GD Weiblen 2005 Biogeography and divergence times in the mulberry family (Moraceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 37:402-416.
90. Zurawski G, MT Clegg, AHD Brown 1984 The nature of nucleotide sequence divergence between barley and maize chloroplast DNA. Genetics 106:735-749.