The economic impact of clean indoor air laws

CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians

Volumn 57, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 367-378

  Eriksen, Michael ^a   Chaloupka, Frank ^b  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBIENT AIR; CIGARETTE SMOKING; ECONOMIC ASPECT; EXPOSURE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW; TOBACCO INDUSTRY;

AIR POLLUTION, INDOOR; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; HEALTH POLICY; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; SMOKING; STATE GOVERNMENT; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 36849009598     PISSN: 00079235     EISSN: 15424863     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3322/CA.57.6.367     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Steinfeld JL. Women and children last? Attitudes toward cigarette smoking and nonsmokers' rights, 1971. NY State J Med 1983;83:1257-1258.
2. US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. The Health Consequences of Smoking; A Report of the Surgeon General: 1972. Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Health Services and Mental Health Administration; 1972.
3. US Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2006.
4. Roper Organization. A Study of Public Attitudes Toward Cigarette Smoking and the Tobacco Industry in 1978. New York, NY: Roper Organization; 1978.
5. California Environmental Protection Agency. Health Effects of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke. Sacramento, CA: California Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment Section and Air Toxicology and Epidemiology Section; 1997.
6. American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation. Smokefree Lists, Maps, and Data. Available at: http://www.no-smoke.org/goingsmokefree.php?id=519. Accessed July 8, 2007.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). State-specific prevalence of smoke-free home rules - United States, 1992-2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2007;56:501-504.
8. Howell F. Smoke-free bars in Ireland: a run-away success. Tob Control 2005;14:73-74.
9. McCaffrey M, Goodman PG, Kelleher K, Clancy L. Smoking, occupancy and staffing levels in a selection of Dublin pubs pre and post a national smoking ban, lessons for all. Ir J Med Sci 2006;175:37-40.
10. Clancy L. Ireland's workplace smoking ban. Breathe 2007;3:237-295.
11. Koh H, Joossens L, Connolly G. Making smoking history worldwide. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1496-1498.
12. World Health Organization. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Available at: http://www.who.int/tobacco/framework/WHO_FCTC_english.pdf. Accessed July 8, 2007.
13. World Health Organization. Updated status of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Available at: http://www.who.int/tobacco/framework/ countrylist/en/index.html. Accessed August 31, 2007.
14. Global Smokefree Partnership. Nations at International Tobacco Control Conference Seize Opportunity to Protect People from Secondhand Smoke and Save Lives. Available at: http://www.fctc.org/x/documents/COP2PressRelease_FCA- GSP_3July.pdf. Accessed July 7, 2007.
15. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. Available at: http://www.healthypeople.gov/. Accessed July 8, 2007.
16. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: Midcourse Review. Available at: http://www.healthypeople.gov/data/midcourse/pdf/fa27.pdf. Accessed July 7, 2007.
17. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals: Third Report. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/. Accessed July 7, 2007.
18. Pirkle JL, Bernert JT, Caudill SP, et al. Trends in the exposure of nonsmokers in the U.S. population to secondhand smoke: 1988-2002. Environ Health Perspect 2006;114:853-858.
19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services. QuickStats: Median Serum Cotinine Levels in Nonsmokers, by Age Group - National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), United States, 1988-1991 through 2001-2002. MMWR Weekly 2006 55:1130. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5541a7.htm. Accessed September 6, 2007.
20. Pickett MS, Schober SE, Brody DJ, et al. Smoke-free laws and secondhand smoke exposure in US non-smoking adults, 1999-2002. Tob Control 2006;15:302-307.
21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Reduced secondhand smoke exposure after implementation of a comprehensive statewide smoking ban - New York, June 26, 2003-June 30, 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2007;56;705-708.
22. Jacobson PD, Wasserman J. The implementation and enforcement of tobacco control laws: policy implications for activists and the industry. J Health Polit Policy Law 1999;24:567-598.
23. Borland R, Yong HH, Siahpush M, et al. Support for and reported compliance with smoke-free restaurants and bars by smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control 2006:iii34-iii41.
24. Task Force on Community Preventive Services. The Guide to Community Preventive Services: What Works to Promote Health? New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2005.
25. Fong GT, Hyland A, Borland R, et al. Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the ITC Ireland/UK Survey. Tob Control 2006;15:iii51-iii58.
26. National Cancer Institute. Population Based Smoking Cessation: Proceedings of a Conference on What Works to Influence Cessation in the General Population. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 12. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2000. NIH Pub. No. 00-4892.
27. Task Force on Community Preventive Services. The guide to community preventive services: tobacco use prevention and control. Am J Prev Med 2001;20:1-88.
28. Levy DT, Nikolayev L, Mumford E. Recent trends in smoking and the role of public policies: results from the SimSmoke tobacco control policy simulation model. Addiction 2005;100:1526-1536.
29. Levy DT. The role of public policies in reducing smoking prevalence: results from the SimSmoke tobacco policy simulation model, in Bonnie RJ, Stratton K, Wallace RB (eds). Ending the Tobacco Problem: A Blueprint for the Nation. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2007.
30. Stark MJ, Rohde K, Maher JE, et al. The impact of clean indoor air exemptions and preemption policies on the prevalence of a tobacco-specific lung carcinogen among nonsmoking bar and restaurant workers. Am J Public Health 2007;97:1457-1463.
31. Behan DF, Eriksen MP, Lin Y. Economic Effects of Environmental Tobacco Smoke. Society of Actuaries. Available at: http://www.soa.org/research/files/ pdf/ETSReportFinalDraft(Final %203).pdf. Accessed July 8, 2007.
32. Deloitte & Touche LLP. The Impact of Non-smoking Ordinances on Restaurant Financial Performance. Washington, DC: Deloitte & Touche LLP; 2003.
33. KPMG Peat Marwick. Effects of 1998 California Smoking Ban on Bars, Taverns and Night Clubs. Washington, DC: American Beverage Institute; 1998.
34. Chaloupka FJ, Warner KE. The economics of smoking, in Cuyler AJ, Newhouse JP (eds). The Handbook of Health Economics. New York, NY: North-Holland, Elsevier Science B.V.; 2000.
35. Jha P, Chaloupka FJ. Curbing the Epidemic: Governments and the Economics of Tobacco Control. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank; 1999.
36. Glantz SA, Smith LR. The effect of ordinances requiring smoke-free restaurants on restaurant sales. Am J Public Health 1994;84:1081-1085.
37. Glantz SA, Smith LR. The effect of ordinances requiring smoke-free restaurants and bars on revenues: a follow-up. Am J Public Health 1997;87:1687-1693.
38. Hyland A, Cummings KM. Restaurant employment before and after the New York City Smoke-Free Air Act. J Public Health Manag Pract 1999;5:22-27.
39. Hyland A, Tuk J. Restaurant employment boom in New York City. Tob Control 2001;10:199.
40. Connolly GN, Carpenter C, Alpert HR, et al. Evaluation of the Massachusetts Smoke-Free Workplace Law: A Preliminary Report. Cambridge, MA: Harvard School of Public Health; 2005.
41. Pyles MK, Mullineaux DJ, Okoli CT, Hahn EJ. Economic effect of a smoke-free law in a tobacco-growing community. Tob Control 2007;16:66-68.
42. Alamar B, Glantz SA. Smoke-free ordinances increase restaurant profit and value. Contemp Econ Policy 2004;22:520-525.
43. Alamar B, Glantz SA. Effect of smoke-free laws on bar value and profits. Am J Public Health 2007;97:1400-1402.
44. Glantz SA, Charlesworth A. Tourism and hotel revenues before and after passage of smoke-free restaurant ordinances. JAMA 1999;281:1911-1918.
45. Hyland A, Puli V, Cummings KM, Sciandra R. New York's smoke-free regulations: effects on employment and sales in the hospitality industry. Cornell Hotel Restaur Adm Q 2003;44:9-16.
46. Dai C, Denslow D, Hyland A, Lofinia B. The Economic Impact of Florida's Smoke-Free Workplace Law. Gainseville, FL: Bureau of Economic and Business Research, Warrington College of Business Administration, University of Florida; 2004.
47. Glantz SA, Wilson-Loots R. No association of smoke-free ordinances with profits from bingo and charitable games in Massachusetts. Tob Control 2003;12:411-413.
48. Mandel LL, Alamar BC, Glantz SA. Smoke-free law did not affect revenue from gaming in Delaware. Tob Control 2005;14:10-12.
49. Glantz SA, Alamar BC. Correction to Mandel LL, Alamar BC, Glantz SA. Smoke-free law did not affect revenue from gaming in Delaware. Tob Control 2005;14:360.
50. Pakko MR. Smoke-free law did affect revenue from gaming in Delaware. Tob Control 2006;15:68-69.
51. Alamar B, Glantz SA. Authors' response to MR Pakko. Tob Control 2006;15:69.
52. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Assessment of the impact of a 100% smoke-free ordinance on restaurant sales - West Lake Hills, Texas, 1992-1994. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1995;44:370-372.
53. Hyland A, Cummings KM. Restaurateur reports of the economic impact of the New York City Smoke-Free Air Act. J Public Health Manag Pract 1999;5:37-42.
54. Hyland A, Cummings KM. Consumer response to the New York City Smoke-Free Air Act. J Public Health Manag Pract 1999;5:28-36.
55. Collins JT. Assessing the Economic Impact of the Fayetteville, Arkansas Smoking Ban. Fayetteville, AR: Center for Business and Economic Research, Sam M. Walton College of Business, University of Arkansas; 2005.
56. Dress J, Boles S, Lichtenstein E, Strycker L. Multiple Impacts of a Bar Smoking Prohibition Ordinance in Corvallis, Oregon. San Francisco, CA: Pacific Research Institute; 1999.
57. Hayslett J, Huang P. Impact of clean indoor air ordinances on restaurant revenues in four Texas cities. Austin, TX: Bureau of Disease, Injury and Tobacco Prevention, Texas Department of Health; 2000.
58. Scollo M, Lal A. Summary of Studies Assessing the Economic Impact of Smoke-Free Policies in the Hospitality Industry. Carlton, Victoria: VicHealth Centre for Tobacco Control; 2005.
59. Scollo M, Lal A, Hyland A, Glantz S. Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry. Tob Control 2003;12:13-20.
60. Glantz SA. Commentary: Assessing the effects of the Scottish Smokefree Law - the placebo effect and the importance of obtaining unbiased data. Int J Epidemiol 2007;36:155-156.
61. Cowling DW, Bond P. Smoke-free laws and bar revenues in California - the last call. Health Econ 2005;14:1273-1281.