Engineering entropy-driven reactions and networks catalyzed by DNA

Science

Volumn 318, Issue 5853, 2007, Pages 1121-1125

  Zhang, David Yu ^a   Turberfield, Andrew J ^b   Yurke, Bernard ^c,d   Winfree, Erik ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

^d Boise State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE;

BIOCHEMISTRY; BIOENGINEERING; CATALYSIS; DNA; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; KINETICS;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL REACTION; ENTROPY; FLUORESCENCE; INTEGRATED CIRCUIT; KINETICS; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; CATALYSIS; CHEMICAL ENGINEERING; COMPUTERS, MOLECULAR; DNA; ENTROPY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEEDBACK, BIOCHEMICAL; MICE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; RABBITS;

EID: 36248972215     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1148532     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. R. F. Gesteland, T. R. Cech, J. F. Atkins, Eds. The RNA World: The Nature of Modern RNA Suggests a Prebiotic RNA World (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, ed. 3, 2006).
2. N. C. Seeman, Trends Biochem. Sci. 30, 119 (2005).
3. J. Bath, A. J. Turberfield, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 275 (2007).
4. G. F. Joyce, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73, 791 (2004).
5. A. J. Turberfield et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 118102 (2003).
6. J. S. Bois et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 4090 (2005).
7. G. Seelig, B. Yurke, E. Winfree, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 12211 (2006).
8. S. J. Green, D. Lubrich, A. J. Turberfield, Biophys. J. 91, 2966 (2006).
9. M. N. Stojanovic, T. E. Mitchell, D. Stefanovic, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 3555 (2002).
10. J. Macdonald et al., Nano Lett. 6, 2598 (2006).
11. H. Lederman, J. Macdonald, D. Stefanovic, M. N. Stojanovic, Biochemistry 45, 1194 (2006).
12. M. Hagiya, S. Yaegashi, K. Takahashi, in Nanotechnology: Science and Computation, J. Chen, N. Jonoska, G. Rozenberg, Eds. (Springer, New York, 2006), pp. 293-308.
13. M. Levy, A. D. Ellington, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 6416 (2003).
14. R. M. Dirks, N. A. Pierce, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 15275 (2004).
15. M. N. Stojanovic et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 6914 (2005).
16. R. Penchovsky, R. R. Breaker, Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1424 (2005).
17. G. Seelig, D. Soloveichik, D. Y. Zhang, E. Winfree, Science 314, 1585 (2006).
18. In the system presented in Fig. 1, there is some sequence redundancy in the domain sequences chosen (for example, 2b and 5 are identical). This is because all four systems presented in this paper were designed together, with the goal of minimizing the number of differences between systems. In the design of a catalytic reaction in isolation, there are no sequence constraints; we demonstrate a system with completely independent catalyst and output in SOM text S10; it has very similar kinetics to that of the reaction shown in Fig. 1.
19. M. Zuker, Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3406 (2003).
20. J. Sager, D. Stefanovic, in DNA Computing: 11th International Workshop on DNA Computing, A. Carbone, N. A. Pierce, Eds. (Springer, Berlin, 2006), pp. 275-290.
21. K. U. Mir, in DNA-Based Computers II: DIMACS Workshop, L. F. Landweber, E. B. Baum, Eds. (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999), pp. 243-246.
22. B. Yurke, A. P. Mills, Genet. Program. Evolvable Mach. 4, 111 (2003).
23. I. G. Panyutin, P. Hsieh, J. Mol. Biol. 230, 413 (1993).
24. Materials and methods (SOM text S2) are available as supporting material on Science Online.
25. S. A. Marras, F. R. Kramer, S. Tyagi, Nucleic Acids Res. 30, e122 (2002).
26. C. Green, C. Tibbetts, Nucleic Acids Res. 9, 1905 (1981).
27. R. Higuchi, C. Fockler, G. Dollinger, R. Watson, Nat. Biotechnol. 11, 1026 (1993).
28. N. Paul, G. F. Joyce, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 8, 634 (2004).
29. P. Yin, H. M. T. Choi, C. R. Calvert, N. Pierce, Nature, in press.
30. Y. Benenson, B. Gil, U. Ben-Dor, R. Adar, E. Shapiro, Nature 429, 423 (2004).
31. R. Pei et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 12693 (2006).
32. X. Li, D. R. Liu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 4848 (2004).
33. A. D. Ellington, J. Szostak, Nature 346, 818 (1990).
34. J. Tang, R. R. Breaker, Chem. Biol. 4, 453 (1997).
35. S. Müller, D. Strohbach, J. Wolf, Proc. IEEE Nanobiotechnol. 153, 31 (2006).
36. F. J. Isaacs, D. J. Dwyer, J. J. Collins, Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 545 (2006).
37. We thank X. R. Bao, G. Seelig, D. Soloveichik, P. Rothemund, and L. Adleman for insightful discussions. There is a patent pending on this work. D.Y.Z. and A.J.T. were supported by UK research councils (Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, Medical Research Council, and the Ministry of Defence) though the Bionanotechnology Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration. D.Y.Z. and E.W. were supported by a Caltech Grubstake Grant and NSF grants 0506468, 0622254, and 0533064. D.Y.Z. is supported by the Fannie and John Hertz Foundation.