Kinetics from implicit solvent simulations of biomolecules as a function of viscosity

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Volumn 3, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1734-1748

  Feig, Michael ^a  

^a Michigan State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35948997379     PISSN: 15499618     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ct7000705     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Feig, M.; Brooks, C. L., III. Recent advances in the development and application of implicit solvent models in biomolecule simulations. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2004, 14, 217-224.
2. Baker, N. A. Improving implicit solvent simulations: a Poisson-centric view. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2005, 15 (2), 137-143.
3. Roux, B.; Simonson, T. Implicit Solvent, Models. Biophys. Chem. 1999, 78, 1-20.
4. Cramer, C. J.; Truhlar, D. G. Implicit solvation models: Equilibria, structure spectra and dynamics. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2161-2200.
5. Sitkoff, D.; Sharp, K. A.; Honig, B. Accurate Calculation of Hydration Free-Energies Using Macroscopic Solvent Models. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 1978-1988.
6. Honig, B.; Nicholls, A. Classical Electrostatics in Biology and Chemistry. Science 1995, 268, 1144-1149.
7. Sharp, K. A.; Honig, B. Electrostatic Interactions in Macromolecules - Theory and Applications. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 1990, 19, 301-332.
8. Warwicker, J.; Watson, H. C. Calculation of the Electric Potentialin the Active Site Cleft due to α-Helix Dipoles. J. Mol. Biol. 1982, 157, 671-679.
9. Fogolari, F.; Brigo, A.; Molinari, H. The Poisson-Boltzmann equation for biomolecular electrostatics: a tool for structural biology. J. Mol. Recognit. 2002, 15, 377-392.
10. Im, W.; Beglov, D.; Roux, B. Continuum Solvation Model: Computation of Electrostatic Forces from Numerical Solutions to the Poisson-Boltzmann Equation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1998, 111, 59-75.
11. Friedrichs, M.; Zhou, R. H.; Edinger, S. R.; Friesner, R. A. Poisson-Boltzmann analytical gradients for molecular modeling calculations. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 3057-3061.
12. Lu, B. Z.; Chen, W. Z.; Wang, C. X.; Xu, X.-j. Protein Molecular Dynamics With Electrostatic Force Entirely Determined by a Single Poisson-Boltzmann Calculation. Proteins 2002, 48, 497-504.
13. Luo, R.; David, L.; Gilson, M. K. Accelerated Poisson-Boltzmann Calculations for Static and Dynamic Systems. J. Comput. Chem. 2002, 23, 1244-1253.
14. Still, W. C.; Tempczyk, A.; Hawley, R. C.; Hendrickson, T. Semianalytical Treatment of Solvation for Molecular Mechanics and Dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6127-6129.
15. Yu, Z. Y.; Jacobson, M. P.; Friesner, R. A. What role do surfaces play in GB models? A new-generation of surface-generalized Born model based on a novel Gaussian surface for biomolecules. J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27 (1), 72-89.
16. Onufriev, A.; Bashford, D.; Case, D. A. Exploring protein native states and large-scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model. Proteins 2004, 55 (2), 383-394.
17. Feig, M.; Onufriev, A.; Lee, M. S.; Im, W.; Case, D. A. Brooks, C. L., III. Performance Comparison of Generalized Born and Poisson Methods in the Calculation of Electrostatic Solvation Energies for Protein Structures. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 265-284.
18. Grycuk, T. Deficiency of the Coulomb-field approximation in the generalized Born model: An improved formula for Born radii evaluation. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119, 4817-4826.
19. Gohlke, H.; Case, D. A. Converging Free Energy Estimates: MM-PB(GB)SA Studies on the Protein-Protein Complex Ras-Raf. J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 25, 238-250.
20. Lee, M. S.; Salsbury, F. R., Jr.; Brooks, C. L., III. Novel generalized Born methods. J. Chem Phys. 2002, 116 (24), 10606-10614.
21. Gallicchio, E.; Levy, R. M. AGBNP: An Analytic Implicit Solvent Model Suitable for Molecular Dynamics Simulations and High-Resolution Modeling. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 479-499.
22. Brooks, C. L.; Berkowitz, M.; Adelman, S. A. Generalized Langevin Theory for Many-Body Problems in Chemical-Dynamics - Gas-Surface Collisions Vibrational-Energy Relaxation in Solids and Recombination Reactions in Liquids. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 73 (9), 4353-4364.
23. Zagrovic, B.; Pande, V. Solvent Viscosity Dependence of the Folding Rate of a Small Protein: Distributed Computing Study. J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 24, 1432-1436.
24. Hoover, W. G.; Aoki, K.; Hoover, C. G.; De Groot, S. V. Time-reversible deterministic thermostats. Physica D 2004, 187 (1-4), 253-267.
25. Nose, S. A Molecular Dynamics Method for Simulations in the Canonical Ensemble. Mol. Phys. 1984, 52, 255-268.
26. Hoover, W. G. Constant-Pressure Equations of Motion. Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 1986, 34 (3), 2499-2500.
27. Zagrovic, B.; Sorin, E. J.; Pande, V. β-Hairpin Folding Simulations in Atomistic Detail Using an Implicit Solvent Model. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 313, 151-169.
28. Fan, H.; Mark, A. E.; Zhu, J.; Honig, B. Comparative study of generalized Born models: Protein dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102 (19), 6760-6764.
29. David, L.; Luo, R.; Gilson, M. K. Comparison of Generalized Born and Poisson Models: Energetics and Dynamics of HIV Protease. J. Comput. Chem. 2000, 21, 295-309.
30. Tsui, V.; Case, D. A. Molecular dynamics simulations of nucleic acids with a generalized Born solvation model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2489-2498.
31. Calimet, N.; Schaefer, M.; Simonson, T. Protein Molecular Dynamics With the Generalized Born/ACE Solvent Model. Proteins 2001, 45, 144-158.
32. Ferrara, P.; Apostolakis, J.; Caflish, A. Evaluation of a Fast Implicit Solvent Model for Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Proteins 2002, 46, 24-33.
33. Suenaga, A. Replica-exchange, molecular dynamics simulations for a small-sized protein folding with implicit solvent. THEOCHEM 2003, 634, 235-241.
34. Shen, M.-y.; Freed, K. F. Long Time Dynamics of Met-Enkephalin: Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Solvent Models. Biophys. J. 2002, 82, 1791-1808.
35. Krol, M. Comparison of Various Implicit Solvent Models in Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Immunoglobulin G Light Chain Dimer. J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 24, 531-546.
36. Bursulaya, B. D.; Brooks, C. L., III. Comparative Study of the Folding Free Energy Landscape of a Three-Stranded β-Sheet Protein with Explicit and Implicit Solvent Models. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104 (51), 12378-12383.
37. Chocholousova, J.; Feig, M. Implicit solvent simulations of DNA and DNA-protein complexes: Agreement with explicit solvent vs experiment. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110 (34), 17240-17251.
38. Chocholousova, J.; Feig, M. Balancing an Accurate Representation of the Molecular Surface in Generalized Born Formalisms with Integrator Stability in Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J. Comput. Chem 2006, 27, 719-729.
39. Zhu, J.; Alexov, E.; Honig, B. Comparativestudy of generalized Born models: Born radii and peptide folding. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109 (7), 3008-3022.
40. Chen, J. H.; Im, W. P.; Brooks, C. L. Balancing solvation and intramolecular interactions: Toward a consistent generalized born force field. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128 (11), 3728-3736.
41. Geney, R.; Layten, M.; Gomperts, R.; Hornak, V.; Simmerling, C. Investigation of salt bridge stability in a generalized born solvent model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2006, 2 (1), 115-127.
42. Zhu, J.; Shi, Y.; Liu, H. Parametrization of a Generalized Born/Solvent-Accessible Surface Area Model and Applications to the Simulation of Protein Dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 4844-4853.
43. Nymeyer, H.; Garcia, A. E. Simulation of the folding equilibrium of α-helical peptides: A comparison of the generalized Born approximation with explicit solvent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 13934-13939.
44. Kuszewski, J.; Gronenborn, A. M.; Clore, G. M. Improving the Packing and Accuracy of NMR Structures with a Pseudopotential for the Radius of Gyration. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2337-2338.
45. Cornilescu, G.; Marquardt, J. L.; Ottiger, M.; Bax, A. Validation of Protein Structure from Anisotropic Carbonyl Chemical Shifts in a Dilute Liquid Crystalline Phase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6836-6837.
46. MacKerell, A. D., Jr.; Bashford, D.; Bellott, M.; Dunbrack, J. D.; Evanseck, M. J.; Field, M. J.; Fischer, S.; Gao, J.; Guo, H.; Ha, S.; Joseph-McCarthy, D.; Kuchnir, L.; Kuczera, K.; Lau, F. T. K.; Mattes, C.; Michnick, S.; Ngo, T.; Nguyen, D. T.; Prodhom, B.; Reiher, W. E.; Roux, B.; Schlenkrich, M.; Smith, J. C.; Stote, R.; Straub, J.; Watanabe, M.; Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera, J.; Yin, D.; Karplus, M. All-Atom Empirical Potential for Molecular Modeling and Dynamics Studies of Proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 3586-3616.
47. MacKerell, A. D., Jr.; Feig, M.; Brooks, C. L., III. Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1400-1415.
48. MacKerell, A. D., Jr.; Feig, M.; Brooks, C. L., III. Improved treatment of the protein backbone in empirical force fields. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 698-699.
49. Ryckaert, J. P.; Ciccotti, G.; Berendsen, H. J. C. Numerical-Integration of Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints - Molecular-Dynamics of N-Alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 1977, 23 (3), 327-341.
50. Lee, M. S.; Feig, M.; Salsbury, F. R., Jr.; Brooks, C. L., III. New Analytical Approximation to the Standard Molecular Volume Definition And Its Application to Generalized BornCalculations. J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 24, 1348-1356.
51. Im, W.; Lee, M. S.; Brooks, C. L., III. Generalized Born model with a simple smoothing function. J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 24, 1691-1702.
52. Brooks, B. R.; Bruccoleri, R. E.; Olafson, B. D.; States, D. J.; Swaminathan, S.; Karplus, M. CHARMM: A Program for Macromolecular Energy Minimization and Dynamics Calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 1983, 4, 187-217.
53. Feig, M.; Karanicolas, J.; Brooks, C. L., III. MMTSB Tool Set: Enhanced Sampling and Multiscale Modeling Methods for Applications in Structural Biology. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2004, 22, 377-395.
54. Feig, M.; MacKerell, A. D.; Brooks, C. L. Force field influence on the observation of pi-helical protein structures in molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107 (12), 2831-2836.
55. Drenth, J. Principles of Protein X-ray Crystallography; Springer: New York, 1994; pp 89-91.
56. Henry, E. R.; Szabo, A. Influence of Vibrational Motion on Solid-State Line-Shapes and Nmr Relaxation. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82 (11), 4753-4761.
57. Gallagher, T.; Alexander, P.; Bryan, P.; Gilliland, G. L. 2 Crystal-Structures of the B1 Immunoglobulin-Binding Domain of Streptococcal Protein-G and Comparison with Nmr. Biochemistry 1994, 33 (15), 4721-4729.
58. Vijaykumar, S.; Bugg, C. E.; Cook, W. J. Structure of Ubiquitin Refined at 1.8 a Resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 1987, 194 (3), 531-544.
59. Alexeev, D.; Bury, S. M.; Turner, M. A.; Ogunjobi, O. M.; Muir, T. W.; Ramage, R.; Sawyer, L. Synthetic Structural and Biological Studies of the Ubiquitin System - Chemically Synthesized and Native Ubiquitin Fold into Identical 3-Dimensional Structures. Biochem. J. 1994, 299, 159-163.
60. Lipari, G.; Szabo, A. Model-Free Approach to the Interpretation of Nuclear Magnetic-Resonance Relaxation in Macromolecules. 1. Theory and Range of Validity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104 (17), 4546-4559.
61. Lipari, G.; Szabo, A. Model-Free Approach to the Interpretation of Nuclear Magnetic-Resonance Relaxation in Macromolecules. 2. Analysis of Experimental Results. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104 (17), 4559-4570.
62. Loncharich, R. J.; Brooks, B. R.; Pastor, R. W. Langevin Dynamics of Peptides - the Frictional Dependence of Isomerization Rates of N-Acetylalanyl-N′-Methylamide. Biopolymers 1992, 32 (5), 523-535.
63. Hagen, S. J.; Qiu, L. L.; Pabit, S. A. Diffusional limits to the speed of protein folding: fact or friction? J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2005, 17 (18), S1503-S1514.
64. Gee, P. J.; van Gunsteren, W. F. Numerical simulation of the effect of solvent viscosity on the motions of a beta-peptide heptamer. Chem. - Eur. J. 2005, 12 (1), 72-75.
65. Jagielska, A.; Scheraga, H. A. Influence of Temperature Friction and Random Forces on Folding of the B-Domain of Staphylococcal Protein A: All-Atom Molecular Dynamics in Implicit Solvent. J. Comput. Chem. 2007, 28, 1068-1082.
66. Chekmarev, D. S.; Ishida, T.; Levy, R. M. Long-time conformational transitions of alanine dipeptide in aqueous solution: Continuous, and discrete-state kinetic models. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108 (50), 19487-19495.
67. Swope, W. C.; Pitera, J. W.; Suits, F. Describing protein folding kinetics by molecular dynamics simulations. 1. Theory. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108 (21), 6571-6581.
68. Swope, W. C.; Pitera, J. W.; Suits, F.; Pitman, M.; Eleftheriou, M.; Fitch, B. G.; Germain, R. S.; Rayshubski, A.; Ward, T. J. C.; Zhestkov, Y.; Zhou, R. Describing protein folding kinetics by molecular dynamics simulations. 2. Example applications to alanine dipeptide and beta-hairpin peptide. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108 (21), 6582-6594.
69. Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics 1996, 14 (1), 33.
70. Kuszewski, J.; Gronenborn, A. M.; Clore, G. M. Improving the packing and accuracy of NMR structures with a pseudopotential for the radius of gyration. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121 (10), 2337-2338.
71. Idiyatullin, D.; Daragan, V. A.; Mayo, K. H. (NH)-N-15 backbone dynamics of protein GB1: Comparison of order parameters and correlation times derived using various "model-free" approaches. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107 (11), 2602-2609.
72. Cornilescu, G.; Marquardt, J. L.; Ottiger, M.; Bax, A. Validation of protein structure from anisotropic carbonyl chemical shifts in a dilute liquid crystalline phase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120 (27), 6836-6837.