Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 850-861

  Clay, Kelly M Schmidt ^a   Brown, Carolyn J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR NERVE; ELECTRICALLY EVOKED COMPOUND ACTION POTENTIAL; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MALE; NERVE FUNCTION; NERVE POTENTIAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TELEMETRY; WORD RECOGNITION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 35848959477     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318157671f     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abbas, P. J., & Brown, C. J. (2000). Electrophysiology and device telemetry. In S. Waltzman & N. Cohen (Eds.), Cochlear implants. New York: Thieme Publishers.
2. Abbas, P. J., Brown, C. J., Shallop, J. K., Firszt, J. B., Hughes, M. L., Hong, S. H., et al. (1999). Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear and Hearing, 20(1), 45-59.
3. Abkes, B. A., Miller, C. A., Hu, N., Abbas, P.J. (2003, February 22-27). Adaptation in the auditory nerve in response to a continuous electrical pulse train. Paper presented at the 26th Winter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Daytona Beach, Florida.
4. Brimacombe, J. A., & Eisenberg, L. S. (1984). Tone decay in subjects with the single-channel cochlear implant. Audiology, 23(3), 321-332.
5. Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., & Gantz, B. (1990). Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88(3), 1385-1391.
6. Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., & Gantz, B. J. (1998). Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. The American Journal of Otology, 19(3), 320-327.
7. Brown, C. J., Hughes, M. L., Luk, B., Abbas, P., Wolaver, A., & Gervais, J. (2000). The relationship between ECAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear and Hearing, 21(2), 151-163.
8. Burkard, R., & Hecox, K. E. (1987a). The effect of broadband noise on the human brain-stem auditory evoked response. III. Anatomical locus. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81(4), 1050-1063.
9. Burkard, R., & Hecox, K. E. (1987b). The effect of broadband noise on the human brain-stem auditory evoked response. IV. Additivity of forward-masking and rate-induced wave V latency shifts. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81(4), 1064-1072.
10. Durrant, J. D., & Lovrinic, J. H. (1995). Bases of hearing science (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
11. Eggermont, J. J., & Odenthal, D. W. (1974). Electrophysiological investigation of the human cochlea. Recruitment, masking and adaptation. Audiology, 13(1), 1-22.
12. Faitkowska, M. D., Janezewski, G., Kochanek, K., & Dawidowicz, J. (1983). Studies on the temporary effect of noise on the auditory function in man. Scandinavian Audiology, 12, 295-298.
13. Franck, K. H. (2002). A model of a Nucleus 24 cochlear implant fitting protocol based on the electrically evoked whole nerve action potential. Ear and Hearing, 23 (1 Suppl.), 67S-71S.
14. Franck, K. H., & Norton, S. J. (2001). Estimation of psychophysical levels using the electrically evoked compound action potential measured with the neural response telemetry capabilities of Cochlear Corporation's CI24M device. Ear and Hearing, 22(4), 289-299.
15. Haenggeli, A., Zhang, J. S., Vischer, M. W., Pelizzone, M., & Rouiller, E. M. (1998). Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) of the cochlear nerve in response to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the rat: effects of stimulation at high rates. Audiology, 37, 353-371.
16. Harbert, F., & Young, I. M. (1962). Threshold auditory adaptation. The Journal of Auditory Research, 2, 229-246.
17. Hardie, N. A., & Shepherd, R. K. (1999). Sensorineural hearing loss during development: morphological and physiological response of the cochlea and auditory brainstem. Hearing Research, 128(1-2), 147-165.
18. Hay-McCutcheon, M. J., Brown, C. J., & Abbas, P. J. (2005). An analysis of the impact of auditory-nerve adaptation on behavioral measures of temporal integration on cochlear implant recipients. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(4), 2444-2459.
19. Hughes, M. L., Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., Wolaver, A. A., & Gervais, J. P. (2000). Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children. Ear and Hearing, 21(2), 164-174.
20. Johnson, E. W. (1966). Confirmed retrocochlear lesions. Archives of Otolaryngology, 84, 247-254.
21. Killian, M., Klis, S. F. L., & Smoorenburg, G. F. (1994). Adaptation in the compound action potential response of the guinea pig VIIIth nerve to electrical stimulation. Hearing Research, 81, 66-82.
22. Kramer, S. J., & Teas, D. C. (1982). Forward masking of auditory nerve (N1) and brainstem (wave V) responses in humans. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72(3), 795-803.
23. Leake, P. A., & Hradek, G. T. (1988). Cochlear pathology of long term neomycin induced deafness in cats. Hearing Research, 33(1), 11-33.
24. McKay, C. M., & McDermott, H. J. (1999). The perceptual effects of current pulse duration in electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(2), 998-1009.
25. McKay, C. M., Fewster, L., & Dawson, P. (2005). A different approach to using neural response telemetry for automated cochlear implant processor programming. Ear and Hearing, 26 (4 Suppl.), 38S-44S.
26. Miller, C. A., Abbas, P. J., Robinson, B. K., Rubinstein, J. T., & Matsuoka, A. J. (1999). Electrically evoked single-fiber action potentials from cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation. Hearing Research, 130(1-2), 197-218.
27. Parkins, C. W. (1989). Temporal response patterns of auditory nerve fibers to electrically deafened squirrel monkeys. Hearing Research, 41(2-3), 137-168.
28. Sennaroglu, G., Sennaroglu, L., Yuccel, E. E., & Belgin, E. (2001). Cochlear implants: is there any relationship between stimulation rates and adaptation? Otology & Neurology, 22, 634-636.
29. Seyle, K., & Brown, C. J. (2002). Speech perception using maps based on neural response telemetry measures. Ear and Hearing, 23(1S), 72S-78S.
30. Shannon, R. V. (1983). Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hearing Research, 11, 157-189.
31. Smoorenburg, G. F., Willeboer, C., & van Dijk, J. E. (2002). Speech perception in nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds. Audiology & Neurootology, 7(6), 335-347.
32. Thornton, A. R. D., & Coleman, M. J. (1975). The adaptation of cochlear and brainstem evoked potentials in humans. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 39, 399-406.
33. Vischer, M., Haenggeli, A., Zhang, J., Pelizzone, M., Hausler, R., & Rouiller, E. M. (1997). Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory neurons in an animal model of cochlear implants. American Journal of Otology, 18 (Suppl 6), s27-s29.
34. Wable, J., Franchet, B., & Gallego, S. (2001). Tone decay at threshold with auditory electrical stimulation in digisonic cochlear implantees. Audiology, 40, 235-237.
35. Wilson, B. S., Finley, C. C., Lawson, D. T., & Zerbi, M. (1997). Temporal representations with cochlear implants. American Journal of Otology, 18, s30-s34.