Tone decay at threshold with auditory electrical stimulation in digisonic cochlear implantees;Fatiga del tono a nivel umbral al realizar estimulación eléctrica auditiva con implantes cocleares Digisonic

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 265-271

  Wable, Jocelyne ^a   Frachet, Bruno ^b   Gallégo, Stephane ^c  

^a Audio R   (France)

^b AVICENNE HOSPITAL   (France)

^c NONE   (France)

Author keywords

Auditory adaptation; Cochlear implant; Hearing; Tone decay

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE; ADAPTATION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUDITORY SYSTEM FUNCTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE RATE; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; AGED; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; DEAFNESS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0034750223     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00206090109073120     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Jerger J F. Auditory adaptation. J Acoust Soc Am 1957; 29: 357–363
2. Brimacombe J A, Eisenberg L S. Tone decay in subjects with the single-channel cochlear implant. Audiology 1984; 23: 321–332
3. Shannon R V. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear Res 1983; 11: 157–189
4. van der Honert C, Stypulkowski P H. Characterisation of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) in cats and human. Hear Res 1986; 21: 109–126
5. Scharf B. Loudness adaptation. Hearing Research and Theory, J V, Tobias, E D, Schubert. Academic Press, New York 1983; vol. 2: 1–56
6. Miskiewicz A, Hellman R, Scharf B. Loudness adaptation at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 1281–1286
7. Hellman R, Miskiewicz A, Scharf B. Loudness adaptation and excitation patterns: effects of frequency and level. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 101: 2176–2185
8. Wilson B S, Finley C C, Lawson D T, Wolford R D, Eddington D K, Rabinowitz W M. New level of speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 1991; 352: 236–238
9. Miller J M, Duckert L G, Malone M A, Pfingst B E. Cochlear prothese: stimulation-induced damage. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983; 92: 599–609
10. Shepherd R K, Clark G M. Effects of high electrical stimulus intensities on the auditory nerve using brain stem response audiometry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1987; 96(suppl 128)50–52
11. Tykocinski M, Shepherd R K, Clark G M. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. Hear Res 1995; 88: 124–142
12. Tykocinski M, Shepherd R K, Clark G M. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. II. Comparison of fixed amplitude with amplitude modulated stimuli. Hear Res 1997; 112: 147–157
13. Gantz B J, Brown C J, Abbas P J. Intraoperative measures of electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potential. Am J Otol 1994; 15: 137–144
14. Beliaeff M, Dubus P, Leveau J-M, Repetto J-C, Vincent P. Sound signal processing and stimulation coding of the Digisonic DX10 15-channel cochlear implant. Advances in Cochlear Implants, I J, Hochmair-Desoyer, E S, Hochmair. Manz, Wien 1994; 198–203
15. Green D S, Huerta L. Tests of retro-cochlear function, J, Katz, 1994; 176–180, ed. Handbook of Clinical Audiology, 4th edn, Baltimore
16. Wable J, van den Abbeele T, Gallégo S, Frachet B. Mismatch negativity: a tool for the assessment of stimuli discrimination in cochlear implant subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 111: 743–751
17. Lafon J-C. Le Test Phonétique et la Mesure de ľAudition. Dunod, Paris 1964