Temporal representations with cochlear implants

American Journal of Otology

Volumn 18, Issue 6 SUPPL., 1997, Pages

  Wilson, Blake S ^a,b   Finley, Charles C ^a,b   Lawson, Dewey T ^a,b   Zerbi, Mariangeli ^a  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Acoustic nerve; Cochlear implant; Cochlear prosthesis; Deafness; Electrical stimulation; Evoked potential; Human

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY STIMULATION; CASE REPORT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR NERVE; CONFERENCE PAPER; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; DEAFNESS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HUMANS; TIME FACTORS; VESTIBULOCOCHLEAR NERVE;

EID: 0030775214     PISSN: 01929763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Zerbi M, et al. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Seventh Quarterly Progress Report, NIH project N01-DC-2-2401. Bethesda, MD: Neural Prosthesis Program, National Institutes of Health, 1994.
2. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, et al. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Eleventh Quarterly Progress Report, NIH project N01-DC-2-2401. Bethesda, MD: Neural Prosthesis Program, National Institutes of Health, 1995.
3. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Gantz B. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;88:1385-91.
4. Teas DC, Eldredge DH, Davis H. Cochlear responses to acoustic transients: an interpretation of whole-nerve action potentials. J Acoust Soc Am 1962;34:1438-59.
5. Kiang NYS, Moxon EC, Kahn AR. The relationship of gross potentials recorded from the cochlea to single unit activity in the auditory nerve. In: Ruben RJ, Elberling C, Soloman G, eds. Electrocochleography. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1976:95-115.
6. Hartmann R, Topp G, Klinke R. Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res 1984;13:47-62.
7. Parkins CW. Temporal response patterns of auditory nerve fibers to electrical stimulation in deafened squirrel monkeys. Hear Res 1989;41:137-68.
8. Parnas BR. Noise and neuronal populations conspire to encode simple waveforms reliably. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1996;43: 313-8.
9. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Zerbi M, et al. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Ninth Quarterly Progress Report, NIH project NOl-DC-2-2401. Bethesda, MD: Neural Prosthesis Program, National Institutes of Health, 1994.