A different approach to using neural response telemetry for automated cochlear implant processor programming

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 26, Issue 4 SUPPL., 2005, Pages

  McKay, Colette M ^a,c   Fewster, Leonie ^a   Dawson, Pam ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b Research and Technology Labs   (Australia)

^c ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; LOUDNESS; MODEL; NERVE POTENTIAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SIGNAL PROCESSOR; TELEMETRY;

EID: 23644440293     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200508001-00006     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., Borland, J., & Bertschy, M. R. (1996). Electrically evoked whole nerve action potentials in Ineraid cochlear implant users: responses to different stimulating electrode configurations and comparison to psychophysical responses. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39(3), 453-467.
2. Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., & Gantz, B. J. (1998). Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. American Journal of Otology, 19(3), 320-327.
3. Brown, C. J., Hughes, M. L., Luk, B., Abbas, P. J., Wolaver, A., & Gervais, J. (2000). The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear and Hearing, 21(2), 151-163.
4. Firszt, J. B., Chambers, R. D., & Kraus, N. (2002). Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range and physiological measures. Ear and Hearing, 23(6), 516-531.
5. Gordon, K. A., Ebinger, K. A., Gilden, J. E., & Shapiro, W. H. (2002). Neural response telemetry in 12- to 24-month-old children. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 189, 42-48.
6. Hoppe, U., Rosanowski, F., Iro, H., & Eysholdt, U. (2001). Loudness perception and late auditory evoked potentials in adult cochlear implant users. Scandinavian Audiology, 30(2), 119-125.
7. Hughes, M. L., Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., Wolaver, A. A., & Gervais, J. P. (2000). Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children. Ear and Hearing, 21(2), 164-174.
8. Javel, E., & Shepherd, R. K. (2000). Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve, III: response initiation sites and temporal fine structure. Hearing Research, 140(1-2), 45-76.
9. McKay, C. M., & Henshall, K. R. (2003). The perceptual effects of interphase gap duration in cochlear implant stimulation. Hearing Research, 181(1-2), 94-99.
10. McKay, C. M., Henshall, K. R., Farrell, R. J., & McDermott, H. J. (2003). A practical method of predicting the loudness of complex electrical stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(4 Pt 1), 2054-2063.
11. McKay, C. M., & McDermott, H. J. (1998). Loudness perception with pulsatile electrical stimulation: the effect of interpulse intervals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104(2 Pt 1), 1061-1074.
12. McKay, C. M., Remine, M. D., & McDermott, H. J. (2001). Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(3 Pt 1), 1514-1524.
13. Müller-Deile, J., Hung, T.-V., Morsnowski, A., Charasse, B., Matthijs, K., von Wallenberg, E., et al. (2003). 17th-22nd August 2003. Correlations of auditory nerve refractoriness and the offset between auditory nerve response thresholds and psychophysical thresholds in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses, Asilomar, CA, August 2003 p. 88.
14. Parkins, C. W. (1989). Temporal response patterns of auditory nerve fibers to electrical stimulation in deafened squirrel monkeys. Hearing Research, 41(2-3), 137-168.
15. Prado-Guitierrez, P., Fewster, L. M., Heasman, J. M., McKay, C. M., Shepherd, R. K. (2004). Effect of interphase-gap and pulse-duration on electrically evoked potentials in deafened guinea pigs. Proceedings of the VIII International Cochlear Implant Conference, Indianapolis, IN, May 2004.
16. Seyle, K., & Brown, C. J. (2002). Speech perception using maps based on neural response telemetry measures. Ear and Hearing, 23(1 Suppl), 72S-79S.
17. Shepherd, R. K, & Javel, E. (1997). Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: I, correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status. Hearing Research, 108(1-2), 112-144.
18. Smoorenburg, G. F., Willeboer, C., & van Dijk, J. E. (2002). Speech perception in nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 7(6), 335-347.
19. van den Honert, C., & Mortimer, J. T. (1979). The response of the myelinated nerve fiber to short duration biphasic stimulating currents. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 7(2), 117-125.
20. Wilson, B. S., Finley, C. C., Lawson, D. T., & Zerbi, M. (1997). Temporal representations with cochlear implants. American Journal of Otology, 18(6 Suppl), S30-34.
21. Zeng, F. G., & Shannon, R. V. (1992). Loudness balance between electric and acoustic stimulation. Hearing Research, 60(2), 231-235.
22. Zimmerling, M. J., & Hochmair, E. S. (2002). EAP recordings in Ineraid patients: correlations with psychophysical measures and possible implications for patient fitting. Ear and Hearing, 23(2), 81-91.