Enhanced visual speech perception in individuals with early-onset hearing impairment

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1157-1165

  Auer Jr , Edward T ^a   Bernstein, Lynne E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Deafness; Lipreading; Speechreading

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LIP READING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ONSET AGE; SAMPLING; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; LIPREADING; MALE; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 35848930792     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/080)     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Andersson, U., & Lidestam, B. (2005). Bottom-up driven speechreading in a speechreading expert: The case of AA (JK023). Ear and Hearing, 26, 214-224.
2. Andersson, U., Lyxell, B., Rönnberg, J., & Spens, K. E. (2001). Cognitive correlates of visual speech understanding in hearing-impaired individuals. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 6, 103-116.
3. Auer, E. T., Jr. (2002). The influence of the lexicon on speech read word recognition: Contrasting segmental and lexical distinctiveness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 341-347.
4. Auer, E. T., Jr., & Bernstein, L. E. (1997). Speechreading and the structure of the lexicon: Computationally modeling the effects of reduced phonetic distinctiveness on lexical uniqueness. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 3704-3710.
5. Auer, E. T., Jr., Bernstein, L. E., & Tucker, P. E. (2000). Is subjective word familiarity a meter of ambient language? A natural experiment on effects of perceptual experience. Memory & Cognition, 28, 789-797.
6. Bavelier, D., Brozinsky, C., Tomann, A., Mitchell, T., Neville, H., & Liu, G. (2001). Impact of early deafness and early exposure to sign language on the cerebral organization for motion processing. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 8931-8942.
7. Bavelier, D., & Neville, H. J. (2002). Cross-modal plasticity: Where and how? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 443-452.
8. Bernstein, L. E., & Eberhardt, S. P. (1986). Johns Hopkins Lipreading Corpus I-II: Disc 1 (Videodisc). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
9. Bernstein, L. E., Auer, E. T., Jr., & Tucker, P. E. (2001). Enhanced speechreading in deaf adults: Can short-term training/practice close the gap for hearing adults? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 5-18.
10. Bernstein, L. E., Demorest, M. E., & Tucker, P. E. (1998). What makes a good speechreader? First you have to find one. In R. Campbell, B. Dodd, & D. Burnham (Eds.), Hearing by eye (II): The psychology of speechreading and auditory-visual speech (pp. 211-228). East Sussex, United Kingdom: Psychology Press.
11. Bernstein, L. E., Demorest, M. E., & Tucker, P. E. (2000). Speech perception without hearing. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 233-252.
12. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Davis, H., & Silverman, S. R. (1970). Hearing and deafness. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
14. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test - Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
15. Ellis, T., MacSweeney, M., & Campbell, R. (2001, September). TAS, a new test of adult speechreading: Deaf people really can be better speechreaders. Paper presented at the International Conference on Auditory-Visual Speech Processing (AVSP 2001), Aalborg, Denmark.
16. Hall, D. A., Fussell, C., & Summerfield, A. Q. (2005). Reading fluent speech from talking faces: Typical brain networks and individual differences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 939-953.
17. Hay-McCutcheon, M. J., Pisoni, D. B., & Kirk, K. I. (2005). Audiovisual speech perception in elderly cochlear implant recipients. Laryngoscope, 115, 1887-1894.
18. Irwin, J. R., Whalen, D. H., & Fowler, C. A. (2006). A sex difference in visual influence on heard speech. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 582-592.
19. Johnson, F. M., Hicks, L. H., Goldberg, T., & Myslobodsky, M. (1988). Sex differences in lipreading. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 106-108.
20. MacLeod, A., & Summerfield, Q. (1987). Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception in noise. British Journal of Audiology, 21, 131-141.
21. Mattys, S. L., Bernstein, L. E., & Auer, E. T., Jr. (2002). Stimulus-based lexical distinctiveness as a general word-recognition mechanism. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 667-679.
22. McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976, December 23). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
23. Mogford, K. (1987). Lip-reading in the pre-lingually deaf. In B. D. R. Campbell (Ed.), Hearing by eye: The psychology of lipreading (pp. 191-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Mohammed, T., Campbell, R., MacSweeney, M., Milne, E., Hansen, P., & Coleman, M. (2005). Speechreading skill and visual movement sensitivity are related in deaf speechreaders. Perception, 34, 205-216.
25. Rönnberg, J., Samuelsson, S., & Lyxell, B. (1998). Contextual constraints in sentence-based lipreading in the hearing-impaired. In B. D. R. Campbell & D. Burnham (Eds.), Hearing by eye II: Advances in the psychology of speechreading and auditory-visual speech (pp. 143-154). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
26. Studebaker, G. A. (1985). A "rationalized" arcsine transform. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 455-462.
27. Sumby, W. H., & Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 212-215.
28. Summerfield, A. Q. (1991). Visual perception of phonetic gestures. In I. G. Mattingly & M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.), Modularity and the motor theory of speech perception (pp. 117-137). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Watson, C. S., Qiu, W. W., Chamberlain, M. M., & Li, X. (1996). Auditory and visual speech perception: Confirmation of a modality-independent source of individual differences in speech recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 1153-1162.