What makes a good speechreader? First you have to find one

Hearing Eye II: Advances in the Psychology of Speechreading and Auditory-Visual Speech

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 211-227

  Bernstein, Lynne E ^a   Demorest, Marilyn E ^b   Tucker, Paula E ^a  

^a HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85069146767     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203098752-21     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Auer, E.T., Jr., Waldstein, R.S., Tucker, P.E. & Bernstein, L.E. (1996). Relationships between word knowledge and visual speech perception I: Subjective estimates of word age-of-acquisition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100.
2. Bernstein, L.E. & Benoît, C. (1996). For speech perception by humans or machines, three senses are better than one. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. 3-6 October, Philadelphia, PA.
3. Bernstein, L.E., Coulter, D.C., O’Connell, M.P., Eberhardt, S.P. & Demorest, M.E. (1993). Vibrotactile and haptic speech codes. In A. Risberg, S. Felicetti, G. Plant, & K-E. Spens (Eds), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Tactile Aids, Hearing Aids, and Cochlear Implants. 7-11 June 1992, Stockholm (ISSN 0280-9850).
4. Bernstein, L.E., Demorest, M.E., Coulter, D.C., & O’Connell, M.P. (1991). Lipreading sentences with vibrotactile vocoders: Performance of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 2971-84.
5. Bernstein, L.E., Demorest, M.E. & Tucker, P.E. (1996). Speech perception without hearing. Manuscript submitted for publication.
6. Bernstein, L.E. & Eberhardt, S.P. (1986a). Johns Hopkins Lipreading Corpus I-II: Disc 1. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
7. Bernstein, L.E. & Eberhardt, S.P. (1986b). Johns Hopkins Lipreading Corpus III-IV: Disc 2. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University
8. Braida, L.D. (1991). Cross-modal integration in the identification of consonant segments. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 647-77.
9. Breeuwer, M. & Plomp, R. (1986). Speechreading supplemented with auditorily presented speech parameters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 79, 481-99.
10. California Achievement Test (1977). Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill.
11. Conrad, R. (1977). Lipreading by deaf and hearing children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 60-65.
12. Davis, H. & Silverman, S.R. (Eds). (1970). Hearing and deafness (3rd Ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
13. Demorest, M.E. & Bernstein, L.E. (1992). Sources of variability in speechreading sentences: A generalizability analysis. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 876-91.
14. Erber, N.P. & Alencewicz, C. (1976). Audiological evaluation of deaf children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 41, 256-7.
15. Gardner, E.F., Rudman, H.C., Karlsen, G. & Merwin, J.C. (1982). Stanford Achievement Test (17th Ed.). Cleveland, OH: Psychological Corp.
16. Geers, A. & Moog, J. (1989). Factors predictive of the development of literacy in profoundly hearing-impaired adolescents. Volta Review, 91, 69-86.
17. Green, K.P. & Miller, J.L. (1985). On the role of visual rate information in phonetic perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 269-76.
18. House, A.S., Williams, CE., Hecker, M.H.L. & Kryter, K.D. (1965). Articulation-testing methods: Consonantal differentiation with a closed-response set. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 37, 158-66.
19. Jeffers, J. & Barley, M. (1971). Lipreading (Speechreading). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
20. Kreul, E.J., Nixon, J.C, Kryter, K.D., Bell, D.W. & Lamb, J.S. (1968). A proposed clinical test of speech discrimination. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 11, 536-52.
21. Kuhl, P.K. & Meltzoff, A.N. (1982). The bimodal development of speech in infancy. Science, 218, 361-81.
22. Massaro, D.W. (1987). Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Mogford, K. (1987). Lip-reading in the prelingually deaf. In B. Dodd & R. Campbell (Eds), Hearing by eye: The psychology of lip-reading, (pp. 191-211). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
24. Montgomery, A.A. & Jackson, P.L. (1983). Physical characteristics of the lips underlying vowel lipreading performance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, 2134-44.
25. Montgomery, A.A., Walden, B.E. & Prosek, R.A. (1987). Effects of consonantal context on vowel lipreading. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 50-59.
26. Moores, D.F. & Sweet, C. (1991). Factors predictive of school achievement. In D.F. Moores & K.P. Meadow-Orlans (Eds), Educational and developmental aspects of deafness. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
27. O’Neill, J.J. & Oyer, H.J. (1961). Visual communication for the hard of hearing: History, research and methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28. Owens, E., Kessler, D.K., Telleen, C.C., & Schubert, E.D. (1985). Minimal Auditory Capabilities Battery (Rev. Ed.). St. Louis, MO: Auditec.
29. Parasnis, I. (1983). Effects of parental deafness and early exposure to manual communication on cognitive skills and field independence of young deaf adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26, 588-94.
30. Stanovich, K.E. (1985). Explaining the variance in reading ability in terms of psychological processes: What have we learned? Annals of Dyslexia, 35, 67-96.
31. Summerfield, A.Q. (1987). Some preliminaries to a comprehensive account of audio-visual speech perception. In B. Dodd & R. Campbell (Eds), Hearing by eye: The psychology of lip-reading (pp. 3-51). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
32. Summerfield, A.Q. (1991). Visual perception of phonetic gestures. In I.G. Mattingly & M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds), Modularity and the motor theory of speech perception (pp. 117-38). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Wagner, R.K. & Torgesen, J.K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192-212.