A sex difference in visual influence on heard speech

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 582-592

  Irwin, Julia R ^a   Whalen, D H ^a   Fowler, Carol A ^a,b,c  

^a HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIP READING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIPREADING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; SEX FACTORS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33748847357     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03208760     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. ADOBE SYSTEMS (1995). Adobe Premiere Version 5.1 [Computer software]. San Jose, CA: Author.
2. ALOUFY, S., LAPIDOT, M., & MYSLOBODSKY, M. (1996). Differences in susceptibility to the "blending illusion" among native Hebrew and English speakers. Brain & Language, 53, 51-57.
3. ALSIUS, A., NAVARRA, J., CAMPBELL, R., & SOTO-FARACO, S. (2005). Audiovisual integration of speech falters under high attention demands. Current Biology, 15, 839-843.
4. BAXTER, L. C., SAYKIN, A. J., FLASHMAN, L. A., JOHNSON, S. C., GUERIN, S. J., BABCOCK, D. R., & WISHART, H. A. (2003). Sex differences in semantic language processing: A functional MRI study. Brain & Language, 84, 254-272.
5. BAYNES, K., FUNNELL, M. G., & FOWLER, C. A. (1994). Hemispheric contributions to the integration of visual and auditory information in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 633-641.
6. BRANCAZIO, L. (2004). Lexical influences in audiovisual speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 445-463.
7. BRANCAZIO, L., & MILLER, J. (2005). Use of visual information in speech perception: Evidence for a visual rate effect both with and without a McGurk effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 759-769.
8. CALVERT, G. A. (2001). Crossmodal processing in the human brain: Insights from functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 1110-1123.
9. CALVERT, G. A., BRAMMER, M. J., BULLMORE, E. T., CAMPBELL, R., IVERSEN, S. D., & DAVID, A. S. (1999). Response amplification in sensory-specific cortices during cross-modal binding. NeuroReport, 10, 2619-2623.
10. CALVERT, G. A., & CAMPBELL, R. (2003). Reading speech from still and moving faces: The neural substrates of visible speech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 57-70.
11. CALVERT, G. A., CAMPBELL, R., & BRAMMER, M. J. (2000). Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex. Current Biology, 10, 649-657.
12. CAMPBELL, R. (1994). Audiovisual speech: Where, what, when, how? Current Psychology of Cognition, 13, 76-80.
13. CONEY, J. (2002). Lateral asymmetry in phonological processing: Relating behavioral measures to neuroimaged structures. Brain & Language, 80, 355-365.
14. CONREY, B. L. (2004). Multimodal sentence intelligibility and the detection of auditory-visual asynchrony in speech and nonspeech signals: A first report. Research on Spoken Language Processing: Progress Report No. 26 (pp. 345-355). Bloomington: Indiana University, Department of Psychology, Speech Research Laboratory.
15. CONREY, B. L., & PISONI, D. B. (2004). Detection of auditory-visual asynchrony in speech and nonspeech signals. Research on Spoken Language Processing: Progress Report No. 26 (pp. 71-94). Bloomington: Indiana University, Department of Psychology, Speech Research Laboratory.
16. DALY, N., BENCH, R. J., & CHAPPELL, H. (1996). Gender differences in speech readability. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 29, 1-14.
17. DALY, N., BENCH, [R.] J., & CHAPPELL, H. (1997). Gender differences in visual speech variables. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 30, 63-76.
18. DESJARDINS, R. N., ROGERS, J., & WERKER, J. F. (1997). An exploration of why preschoolers perform differently than do adults in audiovisual speech perception tasks. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 85-110.
19. DESJARDINS, R. N., & WERKER, J. F. (2004). Is the integration of heard and seen speech mandatory for infants? Developmental Psychobiology, 45, 187-203.
20. DIESCH, E. (1995). Left and right hemifield advantages of fusions and combinations in audiovisual speech perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 320-333.
21. FOWLER, C. A., BROWN, J. M., & MANN, V. A. (2000). Contrast effects do not underlie effects of preceding liquids on stop-consonant identification by humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1-12.
22. FOWLER, C. A., & DEKLE, D. J. (1991). Listening with eye and hand: Cross-modal contributions to speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 816-828.
23. FREYD, J. J. (1983a). The mental representation of movement when static stimuli are viewed. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 575-581.
24. FREYD, J. J. (1983b). Representing the dynamics of a static form. Memory & Cognition, 11, 342-346.
25. FROST, J. A., BINDER, J. R., SPRINGER, J. A., HAMMEKE, T. A., BELLGOWAN, P. S. F., RAO, S. M., & COX, R. W. (1999). Language processing is strongly left-lateralized in both sexes: Evidence from functional MRI. Brain, 122, 199-208.
26. GREEN, K. P. (1998). The use of auditory and visual information during phonetic processing: Implications for theories of speech perception. In R. Campbell, B. Dodd, & D. K. Burnham (Eds.), Hearing by eye: II. Advances in the psychology of speechreading and auditory-visual speech (pp. 3-25). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
27. GREEN, K. P., KUHL, P. K., MELTZOFF, A. N., & STEVENS, E. B. (1991). Integrating speech information across talkers, gender, and sensory modality: Female faces and male voices in the McGurk effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 524-536.
28. GREEN, K. P., & NORRIX, L. W. (1997). Acoustic cues to place of articulation and the McGurk effect: The role of release bursts, aspiration, and formant transitions. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 40, 646-665.
29. GUR, R. C., ALSOP, D., GLAHN, D., PETTY, R., SWANSON, C. L., MALDJIAN, J. A., ET AL. (2000). An fMRI study of sex differences in regional activation to a verbal and spatial task. Brain & Language, 74, 157-170.
30. JAEGER, J. J., LOCKWOOD, A. H., VAN VALIN, R. D., KEMMERER, D. L., MURPHY, B. W., & WACK, D. S. (1998). Sex differences in brain regions activated by grammatical and reading tasks. NeuroReport, 9, 2803-2807.
31. JOHNSON, F. M., HICKS, L. H., GOLDBERG, T., & MYSLOBODSKY, M. S. (1988). Sex differences in lipreading. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 106-108.
32. JONES, J. A., & CALLAN, D. E. (2003). Brain activity during audiovisual speech perception: An fMRI study of the McGurk effect. NeuroReport, 14, 1129-1133.
33. JOSSE, G., & TZOURIO-MAZOYER, N. (2004). Hemispheric specialization for language. Brain Research Reviews, 44, 1-12.
34. KANSAKU, K., & KITAZAWA, S. (2001). Imaging studies on sex differences in lateralization of language. Neuroscience Research, 41, 333-337.
35. KNECHT, S., DRAGER, B., DEPPE, M., BOBE, L., LOHMANN, H., FLOEL, A., ET AL. (2000). Handedness and hemispheric dominance in healthy humans. Brain, 123, 2512-2518.
36. MACDONALD, J., ANDERSEN, S., & BACHMANN, T. (2000). Hearing by eye: How much spatial degradation can be tolerated? Perception, 29, 1155-1168.
37. MAJERES, R. L. (1999). Sex differences in phonological processes: Speeded matching and word reading. Memory & Cognition, 27, 246-253.
38. MASSARO, D. W. (1987). Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological enquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. MASSARO, D. W., & COHEN, M. M. (1983). Integration of visual and auditory information in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 753-771.
40. MCGURK, H., & MACDONALD, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
41. MUNHALL, K. G., & TOKHURA, Y. (1998). Audiovisual gating and the time course of speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 530-539.
42. ÖHRSTRÖM, N., & TRAUNMÜLLER, H. (2004). Audiovisual perception of Swedish vowels with and without conflicting cues. In Proceedings, FONETIK 2004 (pp. 40-43). Stockholm: Stockholm University, Department of Linguistics.
43. OLSON, I. R., GATENBY, J., & GORE, J. C. (2002). A comparison of bound and unbound audio-visual information processing in the human cerebral cortex. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 129-138.
44. PARÉ, M., RICHLER, R. C., TEN HOVE, M., & MUNHALL, K. G. (2003). Gaze behavior in audiovisual speech perception: The influence of ocular fixations on the McGurk effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 553-567.
45. PUGH, K. R., SHAYWITZ, B. A., SHAYWITZ, S. E., CONSTABLE, R. T., SKUDLARSKI, P., FULBRIGHT, R. K., ET AL. (1996). Cerebral organization of component processes in reading. Brain, 119, 1221-1238.
46. PUGH, K. R., SHAYWITZ, B. A., SHAYWITZ, S. E., FULBRIGHT, R. K., BYRD, D., SKUDLARSKI, P., ET AL. (1996). Auditory selective attention: An fMRI investigation. NeuroImage, 4, 159-173.
47. RIECKER, A., WILDGRUBER, D., DOGIL, G., GRODD, W., & ACKERMANN, H. (2002). Hemispheric lateralization effects of rhythm implementation during syllable repetitions: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 16, 169-176.
48. ROSENBLUM, L. D., & SALDAN̄A, H. M. (1996). An audiovisual test of kinematic primitives for visual speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 318-331.
49. ROSENBLUM, L. D., & SALDAN̄A, H. M. (1998). Time-varying information for visual speech perception. In R. Campbell, B. Dodd, & D. K. Burnham (Eds.), Hearing by eye: II. Advances in the psychology of speechreading and auditory-visual speech (pp. 61-81). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
50. ROSENBLUM, L. D., SCHMUCKLER. M. A., & JOHNSON, J. A. (1997). The McGurk effect in infants. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 347-357.
51. ROSSELL, S. L., BULLMORE, E. T., WILLIAMS, S. C. R., & DAVID, A. S. (2002). Sex differences in functional brain activation during a lexical visual field task. Brain & Language, 80, 97-105.
52. SEKIYAMA, K., KANNO, I., MIURA, S., & SUGITA, Y. (2003). Auditory-visual speech perception examined by fMRI and PET. Neuroscience Research, 47, 277-287.
53. SHAYWITZ, B. A., SHAYWITZ, S. E., PUGH, K. R., CONSTABLE, R. T., SKUDLARSKI, P., FULBRIGHT, R. K., ET AL. (1995). Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature, 373, 607-609.
54. SUMBY, W. H., & POLLACK, I. (1954). Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 212-215.
55. TIIPPANA, K., ANDERSEN, T. S., & SAMS, M. (2004). Visual attention modulates audiovisual speech perception. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 457-472.
56. VAN WASSENHOVE, V., GRANT, K. W., & POEPPEL, D. (2005). Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 1181-1186.
57. WATSON, C. S., QIU, W. W., CHAMBERLAIN, M. M., & LI, X. (1996). Auditory and visual speech perception: Confirmation of a modality-independent source of individual differences in speech recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 1153-1162.