The influence of the lexicon on speech read word recognition: Contrasting segmental and lexical distinctiveness

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 341-347

  Auer Jr , Edward T ^a  

^a HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LIP READING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SEMANTICS; SPEECH; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; DEAFNESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIPREADING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0036617566     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196291     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ANDREWS, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 802-814.
2. ANDREWS, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439-461.
3. AUER, E. T., JR., & BERNSTEIN, L. E. (1997). Speechreading and the structure of the lexicon: Computationally modeling the effects of reduced phonetic distinctiveness on lexical uniqueness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 3704-3647.
4. AUER, E. T., JR., BERNSTEIN, L. E., & TUCKER, P. E. (2000). Is subjective word familiarity a meter of ambient language? A natural experiment on effects of perceptual experience. Memory & Cognition, 28, 789-797.
5. BERNSTEIN, L. E., AUER, E. T., JR., MOORE, J. K., PONTON, C., DON, M., & SINGH, M. (2000, April). Does auditory cortex listen to visible speech? Poster presented at Cognitive Neuroscience Society, San Francisco.
6. BERNSTEIN, L. E., AUER, E. T., JR., & TUCKER, P. E. (2000). Can speechreading of sentences be improved by short-term training/practice? Results from deaf and hearing adults trained with speechreading alone and with a vibrotactile speech aid. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 44, 5-18.
7. BERNSTEIN, L. E., COULTER, D. C., O'CONNELL, M. P., EBERHARDT, S. P., & DEMOREST, M. E. (1993). Vibrotactile and haptic speech codes. In A. Risberg, S. Felicetti, G. Plant, & K.-E. Spens (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Tactile Aids, Hearing Aids, & Cochlear Implants (pp. 57-70). ISSN 0280-9850.
8. BERNSTEIN, L. E., DEMOREST, M. E., & TUCKER, P. E. (1998). What makes a good speechreader? First you have to find one. In R. Campbell, B. Dodd, & D. Burnham (Eds.), Hearing by eye: II. The psychology of speechreading and auditory-visual speech (pp. 211-228). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
9. BERNSTEIN, L. E., DEMOREST, M. E., & TUCKER, P. E. (2000). Speech perception without hearing. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 233-252.
10. BERNSTEIN, L. E., & EBERHARDT, S. P. (1986). Johns Hopkins Lipreading Corpus I-II: Disc I [Videodisk]. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
11. BERNSTEIN, L. E., EBERHARDT, S. P., & DEMOREST, M. E. (1989), Single-channel vibrotactile supplements to visual perception of intonation and stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 397-405.
12. BERNSTEIN, L. E., IVERSON, P., & AUER, E. T., JR. (1997). Elucidating the complex relationships between phonetic perception and word recognition in audiovisual speech perception. Proceedings of the ESCA/ESCOP Workshop on Audio-Visual Speech Processing (pp. 89-92). ISSN 1018-4554.
13. BREEUWER, M., & PLOMP, R. (1985). Speechreading supplemented with formant-frequency information from voiced speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77, 314-317.
14. CALVERT, G. A., BULLMORE, E. T., BRAMMER, M. J., CAMPBELL, R., WILLIAMS, C. R., MCGUIRE, P. K., WOODRUFF, P. W. R., IVERSEN S. D., & DAVID, A. S. (1997). Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading. Science, 276, 593-596.
15. CARROLL, J. B. (1970). An alternative to Julliand's usage coefficient for lexical frequencies, and a proposal for a standard frequency index (SFI). Computer Studies in Humanities & Verbal Behavior, 3, 61-65.
16. CLUFF, M. S., & LUCE, P. A. (1990). Similarity neighborhoods of spoken two syllable words: Retroactive effects on multiple activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 551-563.
17. FISHER, C. G. (1968). Confusions among visually perceived consonants. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 11, 796-804.
18. FORSTER, K. I., & SHEN, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 696-713.
19. GOLDINGER, S. D., LUCE, P. A., & PISONI, D. B. (1989). Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 501-518.
20. GOLDINGER, S. D., LUCE, P. A., PISONI, D. B., & MARCARIO, J. K. (1992). Form-based priming in spoken word recognition: The roles of competitive activation and response bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 1211-1238.
21. GRANT, K. W., & BRAIDA, L. D. (1991). Evaluating the articulation index for auditory-visual input. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2952-2960.
22. GRANT, K. W., & WALDEN, B. E. (1996). Spectral distribution of prosodic information. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 39, 228-238.
23. IVERSON, P., BERNSTEIN, L. E., & AUER, E. T., JR. (1998). Phonetic perception and word recognition. Speech Communication, 26, 45-63.
24. JEFFERS, J., & BARLEY, M. (1971). Speechreading (lipreading). Springfield, IL: Thomas.
25. KUČERA, H., & FRANCIS, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
26. KUHL, P. K., & MELTZOFF, A. N. (1988). Speech as an intermodal object of perception. In A. Yonas (Ed.), Perceptual development in infancy (Vol. 20, pp. 235-266). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. LAHIRI, A., & MARSLEN-WILSON, W. (1991). The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon. Cognition, 38, 245-294.
28. LUCE, P. A. (1986). Neighborhoods of words in the mental lexicon (Research on Speech Perception, Tech. Rep. No. 6). Bloomington: Indiana University, Department of Psychology, Speech Research Laboratory.
29. LUCE, P. A., GOLDINGER, S. D., AUER, E. T., JR., & VITEVITCH, M. S. (2000). Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 615-625.
30. LUCE, P. A., & PISONI, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear & Hearing, 19, 1-36.
31. LUCE, P. A., PISONI, D. B., & GOLDINGER, S. D. (1990). Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing (pp. 122-147). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. LUCE, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley.
33. LYXELL, B., & RÖNNBERG, J. (1987). Guessing and speechreading. British Journal of Audiology, 21, 13-20.
34. LYXELL, B., & RÖNNBERG, J. (1991). Visual speech processing: Word-decoding and word-discrimination related to sentence-based speech-reading and hearing impairment. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 32, 9-17.
35. MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D. (1992) Access and integration: Projecting sound onto meaning. In W. D. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 3-24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D., & WELSH, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63.
37. MASSARO, D. (1998). Perceiving talkingfaces: From speech perception to a behavioral principle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
38. MATTYS, S., BERNSTEIN, L. E., & AUER, E. T., JR. (in press). Stimulus-based lexical distinctiveness as a general word-recognition mechanism. Perception & Psychophysics.
39. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & ELMAN, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
40. MORRISON, C. M., & ELLIS, A. W. (1995). Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 116-133.
41. NORRIS, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous word recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.
42. OWENS, E., & BLAZEK, B. (1985). Visemes observed by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing adult viewers. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 28, 381-393.
43. RÖNNBERG, J. (1995). Perceptual compensation in the deaf and blind: Myth or reality? In R. A. Dixon & L. Bäckman (Eds.), Compensating for psychological deficits and declines (pp. 251-274). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. RÖNNBERG, J., SAMUELSSON, S., & LYXELL, B. (1998). Conceptual constraints in sentence-based lipreading in the hearing-impaired. In R. Campbell, B. Dodd, & D. Burnham (Eds.), Hearing by eye: II. The psychology of speechreading and auditory-visual speech (pp. 143-153). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
45. SEITZ, P. F., BERNSTEIN, L. E., AUER, E. T., JR., & MACEACHERN, M. E. (1998). PhLex (phonologically transformable lexicon): A 35,000-word computer readable pronouncing American English lexicon on structural principles, with accompanying phonological transformations, and word frequencies. Los Angeles: House Ear Institute.