Do alternative instructional approaches result in different game performance learning outcomes? Authentic assessment in varying game conditions

International Journal of Sport Psychology

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 263-282

  Tallir, Isabel B ^a   Lenoir, Matthieu ^a   Valcke, Martin ^a   Musch, Eliane ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Decision making; Invasion game; Motor skill execution; Physical education; Primary school; Video analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 35649010002     PISSN: 00470767     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anderson, J.R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369-406.
2. Chi, & Rees, E.T (1983) A learning framework for development. In M.T.H. Chi (Ed.), Contributions in human development, (vol. 9) (pp.71-107). Basel: Karger.
3. Bernaerdt, T., & Guns, J. (2006). Analysis of youth basketball game play: Comparison between 5 on 5 and 3 on 3 game play. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Ghent, Belgium.
4. Brooker, R., Kirk, D., & Braiuka, S. (2000). Implementing a game sense approach to teaching junior high school basketball in a naturalistic setting. European Journal of Education Review, 6(1), 7-26.
5. Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1982). A model for the teaching of games in secondary schools. Bulletin of Physical Education, 18, 7-10.
6. Capel, S. (2000) 'Approaches to teaching games'. In S. Capel & S. Piotrowski (eds). Issues in physical education. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer, Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 81-98.
7. French, K.E., & Thomas, J.R. (1987). The relation of knowledge development to children's basketball performance. Journal of Sport Psychology, 9, 15-32.
8. French, K.E., Werner, PH., Rink, J.E., Taylor, K., & Hussey, K. (1996). The effects of a 3week unit of tactical, skill, or combined tactical and skill instruction on badminton performance of ninth-grade students. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 15, 418-438.
9. Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
10. Gréhaigne, J.F., Godbout, P., & Bouthier (1997). Performance assessment in team sports. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16, 500-516.
11. Griffin, L. L., Mitchell, S. A. & Oslin, J. L. (1997). Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical games approach. Champaign, Il: Human Kinetics.
12. Harrison, J.M., Preece, L.A., Blakemore, CL, Richards R.P., Wilkinson, C., & Fellingham, G.W. (1999). Effects of two instructional models - skill teaching and mastery learning - on skill development, knowledge, self-efficacy, and game play in volleyball. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 19(1), 34-57.
13. Holt, NX., Strean, WB., & Bengoechea, E.G. (2002). Expanding the teaching games for understanding model: New avenues for future research and practice. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21(2), 162-176.
14. Kirk, D. (2005) 'Model-based teaching and assessment in physical education: The tactical games model'. In: K. Green & K. Hardman (eds.), Physical education: Essential issues. (pp. 128-142) London: Sage publications.
15. Light, R., & Fawns, R. (2003). Knowing the game: Integrating speech and action in games teaching through TGfU. Quest, 55(2), 161-176.
16. Metzler, M. W. (2000). Instructional models for physical education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
17. Mitchell, S.A., Griffin, L.L., & Oslin, J.L (1994). Tactical awareness as a developmentally appropriate focus for the teaching of games in elementary and secondary physical education. The Physical Educator, 51(1), 21-28.
18. Mitchell, S.A., Oslin, J.L., & Griffin, L.L. (1995) The effects of two instructional approaches on game performance. Pedagogy in practice - Teaching and coaching in physical education and sport, 1, 36-48.
19. Mitchell, S., Oslin,J., & Griffin, L. (2003). Sport foundations for elementary physical education: A tactical games approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
20. Musch, E., Mertens, B., Goethals, R., Van Den Bossche, W., Coen, W., & Dobbelaere, D. (1988). Het sportspelconcept van de RUG [The Ghent University sport game concept]. Tijdschrift voor Lichamelijke Opvoeding - Theorie, Praktijk, 110, 2-8.
21. Musch, E., Mertens, B., Graça, A., Timmers, E., Meertens, T., Taborsky, E, Remy, C., Multael, M., Vonderlinck, V., & De Clercq, D. (2002, October). The invasion games competence model: An alternative approach to games instruction and learning, presented on CD-ROM. Poster session presented at the AISEP congress of La Coruña, Spain.
22. Nevett, M., Rovegno, I., Babiarz, M., & McCaughtry, N. (2001). Changes in basic tactics and motor skills in an invasion-type game after a 12-lesson unit of instruction. Journal of Teaching in physical education, 20, 352-369.
23. Oslin, J.L., Mitchell, S.A., & Griffin, L.L. (1998). The game performance assessment instrument (GPAI): Development and preliminary validation. Journal of teaching in physical education, 17, 231-243.
24. Rink, J.E., French, K.E., & Tjeerdsma, B.L. (1996). Foundations for the learning and instruction of sport and games. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 15, 399-417.
25. Rumelhart, D.E., & Norman, D. A. (1981). Analogical processes in learning. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (p. 335-361). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Shank, R. C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Tallir, I.B., Musch, E., Valcke, M., & Lenoir, M. (2005). Effects of two instructional approaches for basketball on decision-making and recognition ability. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 36, 107-126.
28. Thomas, K.T., & Thomas, J.R. (1994). Developing expertise in sport: The relation of knowledge and performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 25(3), 295-312.
29. Turner, A.P., & Martinek, T.J. (1992). A comparative analysis of two models for teaching games (technique approach and game-centered (tactical focus) approach). International Journal of Physical Education, 29(4), 15-31.
30. Turner, A.P., & Martinek, T.J. (1995).Teaching for understanding: A model for improving decision making during game play. Quest, 47, 44-63.
31. Turner, A.P., & Martinek, T.J. (1999). An investigation into teaching games for understanding: Effects on skill, knowledge and game play. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70(3), 286-296.
32. Werner, P., Thorpe, R., & Bunker, D. (1996). Teaching games for understanding: evolution of a model. The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 67(1), 28-33.
33. Winn, W., & Snyder, D. (1996). Cognitive perspectives in psychology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 112-142). New York: Macmillan.