The judicial common space

Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 303-325

  Epstein, Lee ^a,e   Martin, Andrew D ^b,f   Segal, Jeffrey A ^c   Westerland, Chad ^d  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^e Department of Law ^*  (United States)

^f WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35649003448     PISSN: 87566222     EISSN: 14657341     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jleo/ewm024     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Babbin, Jed. 2005. "Poisonous Penumbras." American Spectator, http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=7976. (accessed April 4, 2005) (on-line version).
2. Bailey, Michael, and Kelly Chang. 2001. "Comparing Presidents, Senators, and Justices: InterInstitutional Preference Estimation," 17 Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 477-506.
3. Banner, Stuart. 2005. "When Killing a Juvenile was Routine." New York Times, March. 6, p. 4.
4. Bergara, Mario, Barak Richman, and Pablo T. Spiller. 2003. "Modeling Supreme Court Strategic Decision Making: The Congressional Constraint," 28 Legislative Studies Quarterly 247-80.
5. Binder, Sarah A., and Forrest Maltzman. 2002. "Senatorial Delay in Confirming Federal Judges, 1947-1998," 46 American Journal of Political Science 477-506.
6. Calvert, Randall L., and Richard F. Fenno Jr. 1994. "Strategy and Sophisticated Voting in the Senate," 56 Journal of Politics 349-76.
7. Cameron, Charles M. 1993. "Decision-Making and Positive Political Theory (Or, Using Game Theory to Study Judicial Politics)." Paper presented at the Wallis Institute of Political Economy, Rochester, N.Y.
8. Cameron, Charles M., Jeffrey A. Segal, and Donald R. Songer. 2000. "Strategic Auditing in a Political Hierarchy: An Informational Model, of the Supreme Courts Certiorari Decisions," 94 American Political Science Review 101-16.
9. Choi, Stephen J., and G. Mitu Gulati. 2004a. "A Tournament of Judges?" 92 California Law Review 299-322.
10. _. 2004b. "Choosing the next Supreme Court Justice," 78 Southern California Law Review 23-117.
11. Clinton, Joshua, Simon Jackman, and Douglas Rivers. 2004. "The Statistical. Analysis of Roll Call Data," 98 American Political Science Review 355-70.
12. Clinton, Joshua D., and Adam Meriowitz. 2004. "Testing Explanations of Strategic Voting in Legislatures: A. Reexamination of the Compromise of 1790," 48 American Journal of Political Science 675-89.
13. Comment. 1941. "The Attitude of Lower Courts to Changing Precedents," 50 Yale Law Journal 1448-59.
14. Cross, Frank B., and Emerson H. Tiller. 1998. "Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals," 107 Yale Law Journal 2155-75.
15. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
16. Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
17. Epstein, Lee, Jack Knight, and Andrew Martin. 2003. "The Norm of Prior Judicial Experience and Its Consequences for Career Diversity on the U.S. Supreme Court," 91 California Law Review 903-66.
18. Eskridge, William N., Jr. 1991. "Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions," 101 Yale Law Journal 331-417.
19. Giles, Micheal W., Virgina A. Hettinger, and Todd Peppers. 2001. "Picking Federal Judges: A Note on Policy and Partisan Selection Agendas," 54 Political Research Quarterly 623-41.
20. _. 2002. "Measuring the Preferences of Federal Judges: Alternatives to Party of the Appointing President." Emory University Typescript.
21. Greenhouse, Linda. 2005. "Supreme Court, 5-4, Forbids Execution in Juvenile Crime." New York Times, p. 1A.
22. Grofman, Bernard, and Timothy J. Brazill. 2002. "Identifying the Median Justice on the Supreme Court through Multidimensional Scaling: Analysis of 'Natural Courts' 1953-1991," 112 Public Choice 55-79.
23. Howard, Robert M., and David C. Nixon. 2003. "Local Control of the Bureaucracy: Federal Appeals Courts, Ideology, and the Internal Revenue Service," 13 Washington University Journal of Law and Policy 233-56.
24. Lupia, Arthur, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1994. "Learning from Oversight: Fire Alarms and Police Patrols Reconstructed," 10 Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 96-125.
25. Martin, Andrew D. 2001. "Congressional Decision Making and the Separation of Powers," 95 American Political Science Review 361-78.
26. Martin, Andrew D., and Kevin M. Quinn. 2001. "Bayesian Learning About Ideal Points of Supreme Court Justices, 1953-1999." Presented at the 2001 Political Methodology Summer Meeting.
27. _. 2002. "Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953-1999," 10 Political Analysis 134-53.
28. _. 2005a. "Ideal Points for the U.S. Supreme Court (November 19, 2004)." http://mqscor-es.wustl.edu/ (accessed April 1, 2005).
29. _. 2005b. MCMCpack: Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) Package. R Package Version 0.6-4. http://cran.rproject.org.
30. Martin, Andrew D., Kevin Quinn, and Lee Epstein. 2005. "The Median Justice on the United States Supreme Court," 83 North Carolina Law Review 1275-322.
31. McCubbins, Mathew D., and Thomas Schwartz. 1984. "Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols Versus Fire Alarms," 28 American Journal of Political Science 165-79.
32. McNollgast. 1994. "Politics and the Courts: A. Positive Theory of Judicial Doctrine and the Rule of Law," 68 Southern California Law Review 1631-82.
33. Moraski, Brian J., and Charles R. Shipan. 1999. "The Politics of Supreme Court Nominations: A. Theory of Institutional Choice and Constraints," 43 American Journal of Political Science 1069-95.
34. Poole, Keith T. 1998. "Estimating a Basic Space from, a Set of Issue Scales," 42 American Journal of Political Science 954-93.
35. _. 2005. "Common Space Scores, Congresses 75-108 (March 9, 2005)." http://voteview.-com/basic.htm (accessed April 1, 2005).
36. Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal, 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll-Call Voting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Revesz, Richard L. 2001. "Congressional Influence on Judicial Behavior," 76 New York University Law Review 1100-41.
38. Sala, Brian R., and James F. Spriggs III. 2004. "Designing Tests of the Supreme Court and the Separation of Powers," 57 Political Research Quarterly 197-208.
39. Scherer, Nancy. 2005. Scoring Points: Politicians, Activists and the Lower Federal Court Appointment Process. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
40. Segal, Jeffrey A. 1997. "Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Law and Courts," 91 American Political Science Review 28-44.
41. Segal, Jeffrey A., Charles M. Cameron, and Albert D. Cover. 1992. "A Spatial Model of Roll Call Voting: Senators, Constituents, Presidents, and Interest Groups in Supreme Court Confirmations," 36 American Journal of Political Science 96-121.
42. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Albert D. Cover. 1989. "Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices," 83 American Political Science Review 557-65.
43. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Spiller, Pablo T., and Rafael. Gely. 1992. "Congressional Control of Judicial Independence: The Determinants of U. S. Supreme Court Labor-Relations Decisions, 1949-1988," HRAND Journal of Economics 463-92.