Research in the Wake of the No Child Left behind Act: Why the Controversies Will Continue and Some Suggestions for Controversial Research

Behavioral Disorders

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 300-310

  Brigham, Frederick J ^a   Gustashaw III, William E ^a   Wiley, Andrew L ^a   Brigham, Michele St Peter ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b Albemarle Corporation   (United States)

^c Western Albemarle High School   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3543107450     PISSN: 01987429     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/019874290402900302     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Brigham, F. J., Gustashaw, W. E., III, & Brigham, M. S. P. (2004). Scientific practice and the tradition of advocacy in special education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 200-206.
2. Brigham, F. J., & Kauffman, J. M. (1998). Creating supportive environments for students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Effective School Practices, 17(2), 23-33.
3. Brigham, F. J., Tochterman, S., & Brigham, M. S. P. (2001). Students with emotional and behavioral disorders and their teachers in test-linked systems of accountability. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 26(1), 19-27.
4. Browder, D., Flowers, C., & Ahlgrim-Delzell, L. (2004). The alignment of alternate assessment content with academic and functional curricula. The Journal of Special Education, 37(4), 211-223.
5. Conroy, M. A., Davis, C. A., Fox, J. J., & Brown, W. H. (2002). Functional assessment of behavior and effective supports for young children with challenging behaviors. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 27(4), 35-47.
6. Cuban, L. (2000). Why is it so hard to get "good" schools? in L. Cuban & D. Shipps (Eds.), Reconstructing the common good in education: Coping with intractable American dilemmas (pp. 148-169). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7. Dobbs, M. (2004, April 22). "'No Child" law leaves schools' old ways behind. The Washington Post, p. A-1.
8. Doosje, B., & Branscombe, N. R. (2003). Attributions for the negative historical actions of a group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 235-248.
9. Espin, C. A., Deno, S. L., & Albayrak-Kaymak, D. (1998). Individualized education programs in resource and inclusive settings: How "individualized" are they? Journal of Special Education, 32, 164-174.
10. Feil, E. G., Walker, H., Severson, H., & Ball, A. (2000). Proactive screening for emotional/behavioral concerns in Head Start preschools: Promising practices and challenges in applied research. Behavioral Disorders, 26, 13-25.
11. Feynman, R. P., Robbins, J., & Dyson, F. J. (1999). The pleasure of finding things out: The best short works of Richard P. Feynman, Cambridge, MA: Helix/Perseus.
12. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 157-171.
13. Gillon, S. M. (2000). "That's not what we meant to do:" Reform and its unintended consequences in twentieth-century America. New York: Norton.
14. Goodman, J. F., & Bond, L. (1993). The individualized education program: A retrospective critique. Journal of Special Education, 26, 408-422.
15. Gottlieb, A. (2000). The dream of reason: A history of western philosophy from the Greeks to the Renaissance (1st American ed.). New York: Norton.
16. Gross, P. R., & Levitt, N. (1994). Higher superstition: The academic left and its quarrels with science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17. Gunter, P. L., & Coutinho, M. J. (1997). Negative reinforcement in classrooms: What we're beginning to learn. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20, 249-264.
18. Haack, S. (2003). Defending science-within reason: Between scientism and cynicism. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
19. Hammond, K. R. (1996). Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Hecht, J. M. (2003). Doubt: A history. The great doubters and their legacy of innovation, from Socrates and Jesus to Thomas Jefferson and Emily Dickinson. New York: HarperSanFrancisco.
21. Hess, F. M., & Brigham, F. J. (2001). How federal special education policy affects schooling in Virginia. In C. E. Finn, Jr., A. J. Rotherham, & C. R. Hokanson, Jr. (Eds.), Rethinking special education for a new century (pp. 161-181 ). Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
22. Hunt, P., & Farron-Davis, F. (1992). A preliminary investigation of IEP quality and content associated with placement in general education versus special education classes. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 247-253.
23. Koertge, N. (1998). A house built on sand: Exposing postmodernist myths about science. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Kramer, R. M. (1999). Stalking the sinister attribution error: Paranoia inside the lab and out. In R. J. Bies & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Research in negotiation in organizations (Vol. 7, pp. 59-91). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
25. Lewicka, M. (1998). Confirmation bias: Cognitive error or adaptive strategy of action control? In M. Kofta, G. Weary, & G. Sedek (Eds.), Personal control in action: Cognitive and motivational mechanisms (pp. 233-258). New York: Plenum.
26. MacBrayer, E. K., Milich, R., & Hundley, M. (2003). Attributional biases in aggressive children and their mothers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 698-708.
27. Neapolitan, J. (1987). Vigilante behavior and attribution bias. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 14(2), 123-137.
28. Nelson, J., Martella, R. M., & Marchand-Martella, N. (2002). Maximizing student learning: The effects of a comprehensive school-based program for preventing problem behaviors. Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders, 10(3), 136-148.
29. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175-220.
30. Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., & Ross, L. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 369-381.
31. Ruscio, J. (2002). Clear thinking with psychology: Separating sense from nonsense. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole/Thomson Learning.
32. Shermer, M. (2002). Why people believe weird things: Pseudoscience, superstition, and other confusions of our time. New York: Holt.
33. Showalter, E. (1997). Hystories: Hysterical epidemics and modern culture. New York: Columbia University Press.
34. Smith, S. W. (1990a). Comparison of individualized education programs (IEPs) of students with behavioral disorders and learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 24, 85-100.
35. Smith, S. W. (1990b). Individualized education programs (IEPs) in special education - From intent to acquiescence. Exceptional Children, 57, 6-14.
36. Sokal, A. D., & Bricmont, J. (1998). Fashionable nonsense: Postmodern intellectuals' abuse of science. New York: Picador USA.
37. Speece, D. L., Case, L. P., & Molloy, D. E. (2003). Responsiveness to general education instruction as the first gate to learning disabilities identification. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(3), 147-156.
38. Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Costs of expertise. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 347-354). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Why smart people can be so stupid. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40. Stone, D. (1997). Policy paradox: The art of political decision-making. New York: Norton.
41. Sugai, G., Sprague, J. R., Horner, R. H., & Walker, H. M. (2001). Preventing school violence: The use of office discipline referrals to assess and monitor school-wide discipline interventions. In H. M. Walker & M. H. Epstein (Eds.), Making schools safer and violence free: Critical issues, solutions, and recommended practices (pp. 50-57). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
42. Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43. U.S. Department of Education, (no date). More local freedom. Retrieved May 5, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/freedom/index.html
44. VanOostrum, N., & Horvath, P. (1997). The effects of hostile attribution on adolescents' aggressive responses to social situations. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 13(1), 48-59.
45. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(3), 137-146.
46. Walker, H. M. (1988). Systematic screening of pupils in the elementary age range at risk for behavior disorders: Development and trial testing of a multiple gating model. Remedial and Special Education, 9(3), 8-20.
47. Walker, H. M., & Severson, H. H. (1992). Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders (SSBD) (2nd ed.). Eugene: University of Oregon, Oregon Research Institute.
48. Weiss, M. P. (2004). Co-teaching as science in the schoolhouse: More questions than answers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 218-223.
49. Weiss, M. P., & Brigham, F. J. (2000). Co-teaching and the model of shared responsibility: What does the research support? In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (pp. 217-245). Greenwich, CT: JAI.