Co-teaching as science in the schoolhouse: More questions than answers

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 218-223

  Weiss, Margaret P ^a  

^a 312 War Memorial Hall ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442424414     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00222194040370030601     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Austin, V. L. (2001). Teachers' beliefs about co-teaching. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 245-255.
2. Baker, J. M. (1995a). Inclusion in Minnesota: Educational experiences of students with learning disabilities in two elementary schools. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 133-143.
3. Baker, J. M. (1995b). Inclusion in Virginia: Educational experiences of students with learning disabilities in one elementary school. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 116-123.
4. Boudah, D. J., Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1997). Collaborative instruction: Is it an effective option for inclusion in secondary classrooms? Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 293-316.
5. Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.
6. Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1998). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. In E. L. Meyen, G. A. Vergason, & R. J. Whelan (Eds.), Educating students with mild disabilities: Strategies and methods (2nd ed., pp. 453-479). Denver: Love.
7. Council for Exceptional Children. (2003). Professional standards: Knowledge and skills base. Retrieved on May 19, 2003, from www.cec.sped.org/ps/ learning.doc
8. Deshler, D. D., Schumaker, J. B., Lenz, B. K., Bulgren, J. A., Hock, M. F., Knight, J., et al. (2001). Ensuring content-area learning by secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 96-108.
9. Gersten, R., & Brengelman, S. (1996). The quest to translate research into practice: The emerging knowledge base. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 67-74.
10. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § et seq.
11. Mastropieri, M. A. (2001). Introduction to the special issue: Is the glass half full or half empty? Challenges encountered by first-year special education teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 35, 66-74.
12. Murawski, W. W., & Swanson, H. L. (2001). A meta-analysis of co-teaching research: Where are the data? Remedial and Special Education, 22, 258-267.
13. National Center for Educational Restructuring and Inclusion. (1995). National study on inclusion: Overview and summary report. New York: Author.
14. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq.
15. Schiller, E. P., & Malouf, D. B. (2000). Research syntheses: Implications for research and practice. In R. Gersten, E. P. Schiller, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues (pp. 251-262). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (1984). A rationale for the merger of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 51, 102-111.
17. Swanson, H. L. (2000). What instruction works for students with learning disabilities? Summarizing the results from a meta-analysis of intervention studies. In R. Gersten, E. P. Schiller, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues (pp. 1-30). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. U.S. Department of Education. (1999). Assistance to states for the education of children with disabilities and the early intervention program for infants and toddlers with disabilities: Final regulations. Washington, DC: Author.
19. Vaughn, S., Bos, C. S., & Schumm, J. S. (2000). Teaching exceptional, diverse, and at-risk students in the general education classroom (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20. Wagner, M., Blackorby, J., & Hebbler, K. (1993). Beyond the report card: The multiple dimensions of secondary school performance of students with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Study of Special Education Students. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
21. Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63, 249-294.
22. Weiss, M. P. (1999). The actions of secondary special educators in co-taught and special education settings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
23. Weiss, M. P., & Brigham, F. J. (2000). Co-teaching and the model of shared responsibility: What does the research support? In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Educational interventions (pp. 217-246). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
24. Weiss, M. P., & Lloyd, J. W. (2002). Congruence between roles and actions of secondary special educators in co-taught and special education settings. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 58-68.
25. Will, M. C. (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 411-415.
26. Zigmond, N. (1995a). Inclusion in Kansas: Educational experiences of students with learning disabilities in one elementary school. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 144-154.
27. Zigmond, N. (1995b). Inclusion in Pennsylvania: Educational experiences of students with learning disabilities in one elementary school. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 124-132.
28. Zigmond, N. (1997). Educating students with disabilities: The future of special education. In J. W. Lloyd, E. J. Kame'enui, & D. Chard (Eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities (pp. 377-390). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.