Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders and Their Teachers in Test-Linked Systems of Accountability

Assessment for Effective Intervention

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 19-27

  Brigham, Frederick J ^a   Tochterman, Suzanne ^b   Brigham, Michele St Peter ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^c Albemarle County Schools Charlottesville   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992784266     PISSN: 15345084     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/073724770002600104     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Brophy, J.E., & Good, T.L. (1986). Teacher behavior and students achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research of teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). New York: MacMilllan.
2. Clarke, M., Haney, W., Madaus, G., Lynch, P.S., & Lynch, C.A. (2000). High stakes testing and high school completion. The National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy. Available: http://nbetpp.bc.edu [2000, November 18].
3. Corbet, H.D., & Wilson, B.L. (1991). Testing, reform, and rebellion. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4. Duke, D.L., Tucker, P., & Heinecke, W. (2000). Initial responses of Virginia high schools to the accountability initiative. Charlottesville, VA, The University of Virginia: Thomas Jefferson Center for Educational Design.
5. Firestone, W.A., & Mayrowetz, D. (2000). Rethinking “high stakes” lessons from the United States and England and Wales. Teachers College Record, 102, 724–749.
6. Frase-Blunt, M. (2000). High stakes testing a mixed blessing for special students. CEC Today, 7(2), 1, 5, 7, 15.
7. Gillon, S.M. (2000). That's not what we meant to do: Reform and its unintended consequences in twentieth-century America. New York: Norton.
8. Glassberg, L.A., Hooper, S.R., & Mattison, R.E. (1999). Prevalence of learning disabilities at enrollment in special education students with behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 25, 9–21.
9. Hess, F.M., & Brigham, F.J. (2000). The promise and peril of high-stakes testing. American School Board Journal, 187(1), 26–29.
10. Heubert, J. P., & Hauser, R. M. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11. Hirsch, E.D.J. (1996). The schools we need and why we don't have them. New York: Doubleday.
12. Hockenbury, J.C. (1999). Mnemonic instruction in inclusive classrooms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia.
13. Horn, C., Ramos, M., Blumer, I., Madaus, G., Lynch, P.S., & Lynch, C.A. (2000). Cut scores: Results may vary. The National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy. Available: http://nbetpp.bc.edu [2000, November 18].
14. Hurwitz, N., & Hurwitz, S. (2000). Do high-stakes assessments really improve learning? American School Board Journal, 187(1), 20–25.
15. International Reading Association. (1999). High stakes assessments in reading. Reading Teacher, 53, 257–263.
16. Kauffman, J.M. (2001). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17. Kavale, K.A., & Fomess, S.R. (1999). Efficacy of special education and related services. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
18. Marshall, J.C. (1987). State initiative in minimum competency testing for students. Bloomington, IN: Consortium on Educational Policy Studies.
19. Miller, S.R., & Miller, P.F. (1997). Assessment of individuals with disabilities: Educational utility or social futility? In R. F. Dillon (Ed.), Handbook on testing (pp. 296–307). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
20. Mills, C.N., Melican, G.J., & Ahluwalia, N.T. (1991). Defining minimal competence. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(2), 7–10.
21. Quinn, M.M., Osher, D., Warger, C.L., Hanley, T.V., Bader, B.D., & Hoffman, C.C. (2000). Teaching and working with children who have emotional and behavioral challenges. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
22. Raspberry, W. (2000, October 9). Behind the buzz words. Washington Post, A23.
23. Reeves, D.B. (1998). Making standards work: How to implement standards-based assessments in the classroom, school and district. Denver, CO: Center for Performance Assessment.
24. Sacks, P. (1999). Standardized minds: The high price of America's testing culture and what we can do to change it. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
25. Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1992). Effective mainstreaming strategies for mildly handicapped students. Elementary School Journal, 92, 389–409.
26. Smith, M.L., & Rottenberg, C. (1991). Unintended consequences of external testing in elementary schools. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10, 7–11.
27. Taylor, C. (1994). Assessment for measurement or standards: The peril and promise of large-scale assessment reform. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 231–262.
28. Thurlow, M.L., & Johnson, D.R. (2000). High-stakes testing of students with disabilities. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 305–315.
29. Tochterman, S. (2000, November). Standards, high stakes assessment, charter schools, and school to work: Implications of reform initiatives on students with special needs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Teacher Educators of Children with Behavioral Disorders, Scottsdale, AZ.
30. Trejos, N. (2000, November 25). Letter grades no longer hit the mark. Washington Post, B7.
31. Webber, J., & Scheuermann, B. (1997). A challenging future: Current barriers and recommended action for our field. Behavioral Disorders, 22, 167–178.
32. Woolfolk, A.E. (1995). Educational psychology (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.