Behavioural and growth responses of a territorial fish (Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, L.) to multiple predatory cues

Ethology

Volumn 113, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1061-1072

  Blanchet, Simon ^a   Bernatchez, Louis ^a   Dodson, Julian J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; AVOIDANCE REACTION; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; ENVIRONMENTAL CUE; FITNESS; GROWTH RATE; GROWTH RESPONSE; PREDATION; SALMONID; SURVIVAL; TERRITORIALITY;

ANIMALIA; SALMO SALAR;

EID: 35348987058     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01410.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Ajie, B. C., Pintor, L. M., Watters, J., Kerby, J. L., Hammond, J. I. Sih, A. 2007 : A framework for determining the fitness consequences of antipredator behaviour. Behav. Ecol. 18, 267 270. doi :.
2. Amo, L., Lopez, P. Martin, J. 2004 : Wall lizards combine chemical and visual cues of ambush snake predators to avoid overestimating risk inside refuges. Anim. Behav. 67, 647 653. doi:.
3. Bell, A. M. 2005 : Behavioural differences between individuals and two populations of stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). J. Evol. Biol. 18, 464 473. doi:.
4. Biro, P. A., Post, J. R. Parkinson, E. A. 2003 : From individuals to populations: prey fish risk-taking mediates mortality in whole-system experiments. Ecology 84, 2419 2431.
5. Brown, G. E. 2003 : Learning about danger: chemical alarm cues and local risk assessment in prey fishes. Fish Fisheries 4, 227 234.
6. Brown, G. E., Bongiorno, T., DiCapua, D. M., Ivan, L. I. Roh, E. 2006 : Effects of group size on the threat-sensitive response to varying concentrations of chemical alarm cues by juvenile convict cichlids. Can. J. Zool. 84, 1 8. doi:.
7. Chevan, A. Sutherland, M. 1991 : Hierarchical partitioning. Am. Stat. 45, 90 96.
8. Chivers, D. P. Smith, R. J. A. 1998 : Chemical alarm signalling in aquatic predator-prey systems: a review and prospectus. Ecoscience 5, 338 352.
9. Chivers, D. P., Mirza, R. S., Bryer, P. J. Kiesecker, J. M. 2001 : Threat-sensitive predator avoidance by slimy sculpins: understanding the importance of visual versus chemical information. Can. J. Zool. 79, 867 873. doi:.
10. Eklov, P. 2000 : Chemical cues from multiple predator-prey interactions induce changes in behaviour and growth of anuran larvae. Oecologia 123, 192 199.
11. Fausch, K. D. 1984 : Profitable stream position for salmonids : relating specific growth rate to net energy gain. Can. J. Zool. 64, 441 451.
12. Fraser, N. H. C. Metcalfe, N. B. 1997 : The costs of becoming noctural: feeding efficiency in relation to light intensity in juvenile Atlantic salmon. Funct. Ecol. 11, 385 391.
13. Griffiths, S. W., Brockmark, S., Höjesjö, J. Johnsson, J. I. 2004 : Coping with divided attention: the advantage of familiarity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 695 699. doi:.
14. Hansen, E. A. Closs, G. P. 2005 : Diel activity and home range size in relation to food supply in a drift-feeding stream fish. Behav. Ecol. 16, 640 648. doi:.
15. Hartman, E. J. Abrahams, M. V. 2000 : Sensory compensation and the detection of predators: the interaction between chemical and visual information. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 571 575.
16. Helfman, G. S. 1989 : Threat-sensitive predator avoidance in damselfish-trumpetfish interactions. Behav. Ecol. Soc. 24, 47 58.
17. Helfman, G. S. Winkelman, D. L. 1997 : Threat sensitivity in bicolor damselfish: effects of sociality and body size. Ethology 103, 369 383.
18. Hirvonen, H., Ranta, E., Piironen, J., Laurila, A. Peuhkuri, N. 2000 : Behavioural responses of naive Arctic charr young to chemical cues from salmonid and non-salmonid fish. Oikos 88, 191 199.
19. Hoffmann, H. A., Benson, M. E. Fernald, R. D. 1999 : Social status regulates growth rate: consequence for life-history strategies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 14171 14176.
20. Kalleberg, H. 1958 : Observations in a stream tank of territoriality and competition in juvenile salmon and trout (Salmo salar L. and S. trutta L.). 39, 55 98, Institute of Freshwater Research, Drottningholm, Sweden.
21. Kats, L. B. Dill, L. M. 1998 : The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience 5, 361 394.
22. Keenleyside, M. H. Yamamoto, F. T. 1962 : Territorial behaviour of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Behaviour 19, 139 169.
23. Klemetsen, A., Amundsen, P. A., Dempson, J. B., Jonsson, B., Jonsson, N. Mortensen, E. 2003 : Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L., brown trout Salmo trutta L. and Artic charr Salvelinus alpinus (L.): a review of aspects of their life histories. Ecol. Freshw. Fish. 12, 1 59.
24. Krams, I. 2000 : Length of feeding day and body weight of great tits in a single-and a two-predator environment. Behav. Ecol. Soc. 48, 147 153.
25. Kronfeld-Schor, N. Dayan, T. 2003 : Partitioning of time as an ecological resource. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 153 181.
26. L'Abee-Lund, J. H., Aass, P. Saegrov, H. 2002 : Long-term variation in piscivory in a brown trout population: effect of changes in available prey organisms. Ecol. Freshw. Fish. 11, 260 269.
27. Leduc, A. O. H. C., Kelly, J. M. Brown, G. E. 2004 : Detection of conspecific alarm cues by juvenile salmonids under neutral and weakly acidic conditions: laboratory and field tests. Oecologia 139, 318 324. doi:.
28. Lima, S. L. Dill, L. M. 1990 : Behavioural decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68, 619 640.
29. Lind, J. Cresswell, W. 2005 : Determining the fitness consequences of antipredation behavior. Behav. Ecol. 16, 945 956. doi:.
30. Loot, G., Aulagnier, S., Lek, S., Thomas, F. Guégan, J. F. 2002 : Experimental demonstration of a behavioural modification in a cyprinid fish, Rutilus rutilus (L.), induced by a parasite, Ligula intestinalis (L.). Can. J. Zool. 80, 738 744. doi:.
31. Ludwig, G. X., Hokka, V., Sulkava, R. Ylonen, H. 2002 : Otter Lutra lutra predation on farmed and free-living salmonids in boreal freshwater habitats. Wildlife Biol. 8, 193 199.
32. Mac Nally, R. 2000 : Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: the distinction between and reconciliation of 'predictive' and 'explanatory' models. Biodivers. Conserv. 9, 655 671.
33. Martel, G. Dill, L. M. 1995 : Influence of movement by coho salmon (Oncorhynchus-kisutch) parr on their detection by common mergansers (Mergus merganser). Ethology 99, 139 149.
34. Metcalfe, N. B., Huntingford, F. A., Graham, W. D. Thorpe, J. E. 1989 : Early social status and the development of life-history strategies in Atlantic salmon. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 236, 7 19.
35. Metcalfe, N. B., Fraser, N. H. C. Burns, M. D. 1999 : Food availability and the nocturnal vs. diurnal foraging trade-off in juvenile salmon. J. Anim. Ecol. 68, 371 381.
36. Mikheev, V. N., Wanzenbock, J. Pasternak, A. F. 2006 : Effects of predator-induced visual and olfactory cues on 0+ perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) foraging behaviour. Ecol. Freshw. Fish. 15, 111 117. doi:.
37. Mirza, R. S. Chivers, D. P. 2001 : Are chemical cues conserved within salmonid fishes? J. Chem. Ecol. 27, 1641 1651.
38. Nakano, S. 1995 : Competitive interactions for foraging microhabitats in a size-structured interspecific dominance hierarchy of two sympatric stream salmonids in a natural habitat. Can. J. Zool. 73, 1845 1854.
39. Nyström, P. Abjornsson, K. 2000 : Effects of fish chemical cues on the interactions between tadpoles and crayfish. Oikos 88, 181 190.
40. Pinheiro, J. C. Bates, D. M. 2000 : Mixed-effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Springer-Verlag, New York.
41. Pont, D., Hugueny, B. Oberdorff, T. 2005 : Modelling habitat requirement of European fishes: do species have similar responses to local and regional environmental constraints? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62, 163 173. doi:.
42. R Development Core Team 2005 : R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, available at: http://www.R-project.org.
43. Reebs, S. G. 2002 : Plasticity of diel and circadian activity rhythms in fishes. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 12, 349 371.
44. Reinhardt, U. G. 1999 : Predation risk breaks size-dependent dominance in juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and provides growth opportunities for risk-prone individuals. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56, 1206 1212.
45. Relyea, R. A. 2003 : How prey respond to combined predators: a review and an empirical test. Ecology 84, 1827 1839.
46. Schoeppner, N. M. Relyea, R. A. 2005 : Damage, digestion, and defence: the roles of alarm cues and kairomones for inducing prey defences. Ecol. Lett. 8, 505 512. doi:.
47. Sih, A., Crowley, P., McPeek, M., Petranka, J. Strohmeier, K. 1985 : Predation, competition, and prey communities - a review of field experiments. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 16, 269 311.
48. Sih, A., Englund, G. Wooster, D. 1998 : Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 350 355.
49. Skelly, D. K. 1992 : Field evidence for a cost of behavioral antipredator response in a larval amphibian. Ecology 73, 704 708.
50. Sloman, K. A., Wilson, L., Freel, J. A., Taylor, A. C., Metcalfe, N. B. Gilmour, K. M. 2002 : The effects of increased flow rates on linear dominance hierarchies and physiological function in brown trout, Salmo trutta. Can. J. Zool. 80, 1221 1227. doi:.
51. Smith, M. E. Belk, M. C. 2001 : Risk assessment in western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis): do multiple cues have additive effects? Behav. Ecol. Soc. 51, 101 107. doi:.
52. Stapley, J. 2004 : Do mountain log skinks (Pseudemoia entrecasteauxii) modify their behaviour in the presence of two predators? Behav. Ecol. Soc. 56, 185 189. doi:.
53. Teplitsky, C., Plenet, S. Joly, P. 2003 : Tadpoles' responses to risk of fish introduction. Oecologia 134, 270 277. doi:.
54. Teplitsky, C., Plenet, S. Joly, P. 2004 : Hierarchical responses of tadpoles to multiple predators. Ecology 85, 2888 2894.
55. Van Buskirk, J. Yurewicz, K. L. 1998 : Effects of predators on prey growth rate: relative contributions of thinning and reduced activity. Oikos 82, 20 28.
56. Watson, R. T., Mathis, A. Thompson, R. 2004 : Influence of physical stress, distress cues, and predator kairomones on the foraging behavior of Ozark zigzag salamanders, Plethodon angusticlavius. Behav. Process. 65, 201 209.
57. Weightman, J. O. Arsenault, D. J. 2002 : Predator classification by the sea pen Ptilosarcus gurneyi (Cnidaria): role of waterborne chemical cues and physical contact with predatory sea stars. Can. J. Zool. 80, 185 190. doi:.
58. Zar, J. H. 1999 : Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall International, Upper Saddle River, NJ.