Tadpoles' responses to risk of fish introduction

Oecologia

Volumn 134, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 270-277

  Teplitsky, C ^a   Plenet S ^a   Joly, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

Behaviour; Morphology; Plasticity; Predation; Vulnerability

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; AMPHIBIAN; ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; ECOMORPHOLOGY; INDUCED RESPONSE; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION;

AMPHIBIA; ANIMALIA; ANURA; HYLA ARBOREA; RANA DALMATINA; RANA RIDIBUNDA;

EID: 0037266925     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-1106-2     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adams MJ (1999) Correlated factors in amphibian decline: exotic species and habitat change in western Washington. J Wildl Manage 63:1162-1171
2. Adler FR, Harvell CD (1990) Inducible defenses, phenotypic variability and biotic environments. Trends Ecol Evol 5:407-410
3. Berven KA (1990) Factors affecting populations fluctuations in larval and adult stages of the woodfrog (Rana sylvatica). Ecology 71:1599-1608
4. Blaustein AR, Wake DB (1990) Declining amphibian populations: a global phenomenon. Trends Ecol Evol 5:203-204
5. Boersma M, Spaak P, DeMeester L (1998) Predator-mediated plasticity in morphology, life history, and behavior of Daphnia: the uncoupling of responses. Am Nat 152:925-927
6. Brönmark C, Edenhamn P (1994) Does the presence of fish affect the distribution of tree frogs (Hyla arborea). Conserv Biol 8:841-845
7. Delis PR, Mushinsky HR, McCoy ED (1996) Decline of some west-central Florida anuran populations in response to habitat degradation. Biodivers Conserv 5:1579-1595
8. Endler JA (1995) Multiple-trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. Trends Ecol Evol 10:22-29
9. Goodsell JA, Kats LB (I999) Effect of introduced mosquitofish on pacific treefrogs and the role of alternative prey. Conserv Biol 13:921-924
10. Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183-190
11. Harvell CD (1990) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Q Rev Biol 65:323-340
12. Joly P, Morand A (1997) Diversité des stratégies d'histoire de vie sous un régime multifactoriel de perturbations: les amphibiens de la plaine alluviale du Haut-Rhône français. Université Claude Bernard-Lyon I
13. Kats LB, Petranka JW, Sih A (1988) Antipredator defense and the persistence of amphibian larvae with fishes. Ecology 69:1865-1870
14. Lardner B (2000) Morphological and life history response to predators in larvae of seven anurans. Oikos 88:169-180
15. Laurila A, Aho T (1997) Do female common frogs choose their breeding habitat to avoid predation on tadpoles? Oikos 78:585-591
16. Laurila A, Kujasalo J (1999) Habitat duration, predation risk and phenotypic plasticity in common frog (Rana temporaria) tadpoles. J Anim Ecol 68:1123-1132
17. Laurila A, Kujasalo J, Ranta E (1998) Predator-induced changes in life history in two anuran tadpoles: effects of predator diet. Oikos 83:307-317
18. Lawler SP, Dritz D, Strange T, Holyoak M (1999) Effects of introduced mosquitofish and bullfrogs on the threatened California red-legged frog. Conserv Biol 13:613-622
19. McCollum SA, Leimberger JD (1997) Predator-induced morphological change in an amphibian: predation by dragonflies affects tadpole shape and color. Oecologia 109:615-621
20. McCollum SA, VanBuskirk J (1996) Costs and benefits of a predator-induced polyphenism in the gray treefrog Hyla chrysoscelis. Evolution 50:583-593
21. Meyer AH, Schmidt BR, Grossenbacher K (1998) Analysis of three amphibian populations with quarter-century long time-series. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:523-528
22. Moran NA (1992) The evolutionary maintenance of alternative phenotypes. Am Nat 139:971-989
23. Morand A (1996) Dynamique de la coexistence des espèces: de la théorie des perturbations à la théorie des traits d'histoire de vie. L'exemple du modèle amphibien dans l'espace alluvial du Haut-Rhône. Claude Bernard-Lyon I
24. Petranka JW, Kats LB, Sih A (1987) Predator-prey interactions among fish and larval amphibian: use of chemical cues to detect predatory fish. Anim Behav 35:420-425
25. Relyea RA (2001) The relationship between predation risk and antipredator responses in larval anurans. Ecology 82:541-554
26. Relyea RA (2002) Costs of phenotypic plasticity. Am Nat 159:272-282
27. Scheiner SM, Berrigan D (1998) The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. VIII. The cost of plasticity in Daphnia pulex. Evolution 52:368-378
28. Smith DC (1987) Adult recruitment in chorus frogs: effects of size and date at metamorphosis. Ecology 68:344-350
29. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. Freeman, New York
30. Stallard RF (2001) Possible environmental factors underlying amphibian decline in eastern Puerto Rico: analysis of US government data archives. Conserv Biol 15:943-953
31. Tollrian R, Harvell CD (1999) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton
32. Travis J, Keen WH, Julianna J (1985) The role of relative body-size in a predator-prey relationship between dragonfly naiads and larval anurans. Oikos 45:59-65
33. Van Buskirk J (2000) The costs of an inducible defense in anuran larvae. Ecology 81:2813-2821
34. Van Buskirk J, Saxer G (2001) Delayed costs of an induced defense in tadpoles? Morphology, hopping, and development rate at metamorphosis. Evolution 55:821-829
35. Van Buskirk J, Yurewicz KL (1998) Effects of predators on prey growth rate: relative contributions of thinning and reduced activity. Oikos 82:20-28
36. Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA, Werner EE (1997) Natural selection for environmentally induced phenotypes in tadpoles. Evolution 51:1983-1992
37. Wake DB (1991) Declining amphibian populations. Science 203:860
38. Wellborn GA, Skelly DK, Werner EE (1996) Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:337-363
39. West-Eberhard MJ (1989) Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:249-278