Functional genomics of commercial baker's yeasts that have different abilities for sugar utilization and high-sucrose tolerance under different sugar conditions

Yeast

Volumn 24, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 901-911

  Tanaka Tsuno, Fumiko ^a   Mizukami Murata, Satomi ^a   Murata, Yoshinori ^a   Nakamura, Toshihide ^a   Ando, Akira ^a   Takagi, Hiroshi ^b   Shima, Jun ^a  

^a NATIONAL FOOD RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^b NARA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Baker's yeast; Bread baking; DNA microarray; Gene expression; High sucrose stress

Indexed keywords

CARBON; GLYCEROL; NITROGEN; SUCROSE; SUGAR; TREHALOSE;

ARTICLE; BIOSYNTHESIS; BREEDING METHOD; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; CARBON METABOLISM; CELL LEVEL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DOWN REGULATION; FOOD MICROBIOTECHNOLOGY; FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS; GENE DELETION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GROWTH RATE; NITROGEN METABOLISM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; UPREGULATION; YEAST CELL;

CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; FERMENTATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENOMICS; GLYCEROL; MULTIGENE FAMILY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SUCROSE; TREHALOSE;

EID: 35348984459     PISSN: 0749503X     EISSN: 10970061     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/yea.1541     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ando A, Tanaka F, Murata Y, Takagi H, Shima J. 2006. Identification and classification of genes required for tolerance to high-sucrose stress revealed by genome-wide screening of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 6: 249-267.
2. Attfield PV. 1997. Stress tolerance: the key to effective strains of industrial baker's yeast. Nat Biotechnol 15: 1351-1357.
3. Baetz K, Andrews B. 1999. Regulation of cell cycle transcription factor Swi4 through auto-inhibition of DNA binding. Mol Cell Biol 19: 6729-6741.
4. Benjamini Y, Drai D, Elmer G, Kafkafi N, Golani I. 2001. Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behav Brain Res 125: 279-284.
5. Birrell GW, Brown JA, Wu HI, et al. 2002. Transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to DNA-damaging agents does not identify the genes that protect against these agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 8778-8783.
6. Burchett SA, Flanary P, Aston C, et al. 2002. Regulation of stress response signaling by the N-terminal dishevelled/EGL-10/pleckstrin domain of Sst2, a regulator of G protein signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 277: 22156-22167.
7. Collart MA, Oliviero S. 1993. Preparation of yeast RNA. In Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, vol 2, Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, et al. (eds). Wiley: New York; 13.12.1-13.12.5.
8. Cronwright GR, Rohwer JM, Prior BA. 2002. Metabolic control analysis of glycerol synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 4448-4456.
9. De Virgilio C, Hottiger T, Dominguez J, Boller T, Wiemken A. 1994. The role of trehalose synthesis for the acquisition of thermotolerance in yeast. I. Genetic evidence that trehalose is a thermoprotectant. Eur J Biochem 219: 179-186.
10. Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D. 1998. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 14863-14868.
11. Erasmus DJ, van der Merwe GK, van Vuuren HJ. 2003. Genome-wide expression analyses: metabolic adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to high sugar stress. FEMS Yeast Res 3: 375-399.
12. Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L, et al. 2002. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418: 387-391.
13. Heyer LJ, Kruglyak S, Yooseph S. 1999. Exploring expression data: identification and analysis of coexpressed genes. Genome Res 9: 1106-1115.
14. Higgins VJ, Bell PJ, Dawes IW, Attfield PV. 2001. Generation of a novel Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain that exhibits strong maltose utilization and hyperosmotic resistance using nonrecombinant techniques. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 4346-4348.
15. Hino A, Mihara K, Nakashima K, Takano H. 1990. Trehalose levels and survival ratio of freeze-tolerant versus freeze-sensitive yeasts. Appl Environ Microbiol 56: 1386-1391.
16. Hirasawa T, Nakakura Y, Yoshikawa K, et al. 2006. Comparative analysis of transcriptional responses to saline stress in the laboratory and brewing strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with DNA microarray. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 70: 346-357.
17. Ho Sui SJ, Mortimer JR, Arenillas DJ, et al. 2005. oPOSSUM: identification of over-represented transcription factor binding sites in co-expressed genes. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 3154-3164.
18. Linko Y, Javanainen P, Linko S. 1997. Biotechnology of bread baking. Trends Food Sci Technol 8: 339-344.
19. Marchler G, Schüller C, Adam G, Ruis H. 1993. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae UAS element controlled by protein kinase A activates transcription in response to a variety of stress conditions. EMBO J 12: 1997-2003.
20. Martínez-Pastor MT, Marchler G, Schüller C, et al. 1996. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae zinc finger proteins Msn2p and Msn4p are required for transcriptional induction through the stress response element (STRE). EMBO J 15: 2227-2235.
21. Nagodawithana TW, Trivedi NB. 1990. Yeast selection for baking. In Yeast Strain Selection, Panchal CJ (ed.). Marcel Dekker: New York; 139-184.
22. Panadero J, Randez-Gil F, Prieto JA. 2005. Validation of a flour-free model dough system for throughput studies of baker's yeast. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 1142-1147.
23. Pandey G, Yoshikawa K, Hirasawa T, et al. 2007. Extracting the hidden features in saline osmotic tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae from DNA microarray data using the self-organizing map: biosynthesis of amino acids. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 75: 415-426.
24. Perez-Ortin JE, Garcia-Martinez J, Alberola TM. 2002. DNA chips for yeast biotechnology. The case of wine yeasts. J Biotechnol 98: 227-241.
25. Schüller C, Brewster JL, Alexander MR, Gustin MC, Ruis H. 1994. The HOG pathway controls osmotic regulation of transcription via the stress response element (STRE) of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae CTT1 gene. EMBO J 13: 4382-4389.
26. Shima J, Hino A, Yamada-Iyo C, et al. 1999. Stress tolerance in doughs of Saccharomyces cerevisiae trehalase mutants derived from commercial Baker's yeast. Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 2841-2846.
27. Tanaka F, Ando A, Nakamura T, Takagi H, Shima J. 2006. Functional genomic analysis of commercial baker's yeast during initial stages of model dough-fermentation. Food Microbiol 8: 717-728.
28. Varela C, Cardenas J, Melo F, Agosin E. 2005. Quantitative analysis of wine yeast gene expression profiles under winemaking conditions. Yeast 22: 369-383.
29. Verstrepen KJ, Iserentant D, Malcorps P, et al. 2004. Glucose and sucrose: hazardous fast-food for industrial yeast? Trends Biotechnol 22: 531-537.