On the impact of a collaborative pedagogy on African American millennial students in software engineering

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 677-686

  Williams, Laurie ^a   Layman, Lucas ^a   Slaten, Kelli M ^b   Berenson, Sarah B ^b   Seaman, Carolyn ^c  

^a North Carolina State University   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c University of Marylandw Baltimore County   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CODES (SYMBOLS); DATA STRUCTURES; INFORMATION USE; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS; RESPONSE TIME (COMPUTER SYSTEMS); STUDENTS;

AGILE SOFTWARE METHODOLOGIES; COLLABORATIVE ACTIVITIES; STUDENTS CODING;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 34548759054     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICSE.2007.58     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. American Association of University Women Education Foundation, Educating Girls in the New Computer Age, 2000, http:www.aauw.org/ member_center/publications/TechSavvy/TechSavvy.pdf, accessed
2. V. R. Basili and A. J. Turner, "Iterative Enhancement: A Practical Technique for Software Development," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 1, no. 4, 1975, pp. 266-270.
3. K. Beck, Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, Second ed. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 2005.
4. K. Beck, M. Beedle, A. van Bennekum, A. Cockburn, W. Cunningham, M. Fowler, J. Grenning, J. Highsmith, A. Hunt, R. Jeffries, J. Kern, B. Marick, R. C. Martin, S. Mellor, K. Schwaber, J. Sutherland, and D. Thomas, "The Agile Manifesto," http://www.agileAlliance.org, 2001 2001
5. S. B. Berenson, K. M. Slaten, L. Williams, and C.-w, Ho, "Voices of Women in a Software Engineering Course: Reflections on Collaboration" ACM Journal on Educational Resources in Computing, vol. 4, no. 1, 2004, pp, 1-18.
6. S. B. Berenson, L. Williams, and K. M. Slaten, "Using Pair Programming and Agile Development Methods in a University Software Engineering Course to Develop a Model of Social Interactions," Crossing Cultures, Changing Lives Conference, Oxford, UK, 2005, pp. to appear.
7. M. T. H. Chi, "Self-Explaining: The Dual Process of Generating Inference and Repairing Mental Models," in Advances in Instructional Psychology, R. Glaser, Ed. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000, pp. 161-238.
8. A. Cockburn, Agile Software Development. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley Longman, 2001.
9. J. M. Cohoon, "Toward improving female retention in the computer science major," Communications of the ACM, vol. 44, no. 5, 2001, pp. 108-114.
10. J. W. Creswell, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.
11. B. Curtis, "Three Problems Overcome with Behavioral Models of the Software Development Process (Panel)," International Conference on Software Engineering, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989, pp. 398-399.
12. M. Fowler and J. Highsmith, "The Agile Manifesto," in Software Development, August 2001, pp. 28-32.
13. P. Freeman and W. Aspray, "The Supply of Information Technology Workers in the United States," Computing Research Association, Washington, DC, 1999.
14. R. E. Fullilove and P. U. Treisman, "Mathematics achievement among African American undergraduates of the University of California, Berkeley: An evaluation of the Mathematics Workshop Program," Journal of Negro Education, vol. 59, no. 3, 1990, pp. 463-478.
15. A. Joseph and M. Payne, "Group Dynamics and Collaborative Group Performance," Thirty-fourth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Reno, NV, March 2003, pp. 368-371.
16. D. Keirsey, Please Understand Me II. Del Mar, CA: Prometheus Nemesis Book Company, 1998.
17. C. Larman, Agile and Iterative Development: A Manager's Guide. Boston: Addison Wesley, 2004.
18. C. Larman and V. Basili, "A History of Iterative and Incremental Development," IEEE Computer, vol. 36, no. 6, June 2003, pp. 47-56.
19. J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
20. L. Layman, "Changing Students' Perceptions: An Analysis of the Supplementary Benefits of Collaborative Software Development," 19th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T '06), Turtle Bay, Hawaii, 2006, pp. 156-166.
21. L. Layman, T. Cornwell, and L. Williams, "Personality Types, Learning Styles, and an Agile Approach to Software Engineering Education," ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '06), Houston, TX, 2006, pp. 428-432.
22. L. Layman, L. Williams, J. Osborne, S. Berenson, K. Slaten, and M. Vouk, "How and Why Collaborative Software Development Impacts the Software Engineering Course," Frontiers in Education, Indianapolis, IN, 2005, pp. T4C 9-14.
23. J. Margolis and A. F. (1997), "Geek Mythology and Attracting Undergraduate Women to Computer Science," Joint National Conference in Engineering Program Advocates Network and the National Association of Minority Engineering Program Administrators., 1997, pp.
24. J. Margolis and A. Fisher, Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2002.
25. N. Nagappan, L. Williams, M. Ferzli, K. Yang, E. Wiebe, C. Miller, and S. Balik, "Improving the CS1 Experience with Pair Programming," ACM Special Interest Group Compuer Science Education (SIGCSE) 2003, Reno, 2003, pp. 359-362.
26. C. E. Nelson, "Student Diversity Requires Different Approaches to College Teaching, Even in Math and Science," American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 40, no. 2, 1996, pp. 165-175.
27. D. Oblinger, "Boomers, Gen-Xers, and Millennials: Understanding the New Students," Educause Review, vol. 38, no. 4, July/August 2003, pp. 37-47.
28. D. Oblinger and J. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the Net Generation. Boulder, CO: Educause, 2005.
29. C. Raines, Managing Millennials, 2002, htrp://www. generationsatwork.corn/articles/millenials.htm, accessed February 12, 2006.
30. C. B. Seaman, "Qualitative Methods in Empirical Studies of Software Engineering," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 25, no. 4, 1999, pp. 557-572.
31. K. M. Slaten, M. Droujkova, S. Berenson, L. Williams, and L. Layman, "Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Pair Programming and Agile Software Methodologies: Verifying a Model of Social Interaction," Agile 2005, Denver, CO, 2005, pp. 323-330.
32. R. E. Stake, The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 1995.
33. A. L. Strauss and J. M. Corbin, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures of Developing Grounded Theory, Second ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998.
34. U. Treisman, "Studying students studying calculus: A look at the lives of minority mathematics students in college.," The College Mathematics Journal, vol. 23, no. 5, 1992, pp. 362-372.
35. E. Walker and L. O'Neill, "IT courses and the IT industry: Does the future rely on gender or generation?," Annual International Conference of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA), Perth, Australia., 2002, pp. 695-703.
36. J. L. Wertsch and C. Toma, "Discourse and learning in the classroom: A sociocultural approach," in Constructivism in Education, L. Steffe and J. Gale, Eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995, pp. 159-174.
37. L. Williams and R Kessler, Pair Programming Illuminated. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley, 2003.
38. L. A. Williams, "The Collaborative Software Process," University of Utah Department of Computer Science, Salt Lake City, UT, PhD Dissertation, 2000.