Quantitative evaluation of feature extractors for visual SLAM

Proceedings - Fourth Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision, CRV 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 157-164

  Klippenstein, Jonathan ^a   Zhang, Hong ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER VISION; IMAGE MATCHING; INVARIANCE; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS;

IMAGE PAIR EVALUATION; KANADE-LUCAS-TOMASI TRACKER (KLT);

FEATURE EXTRACTION;

EID: 34548723423     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CRV.2007.52     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. S. Agarwal and D. Roth. Learning a sparse representation for object detection. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Computer Vision, volume 4, pages 113-130, 2002.
2. S. Baker and I. Matthews. Lucas-Kanade 20 years on: A unifying framework. International Journal of Computer Vision, 56(3):221-255, February 2004.
3. T. D. Barfoot. Online visual motion estimation using FastSLAM with SIFT features. In IEEE/RSJ International Cnference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Edmonton, Canada, August 2005.
4. A. J. Davison. Real-time simultaneous localisation and mapping with a single camera. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, Nice, 2003.
5. M. W. M. G. Dissanayake, P. Newman, H. F. Durrant-Whyte, S. Clark, and M. Csorba. A solution to the simultaneous localization and map building (SLAM) problem. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 17(3):229-241, June 2001.
6. R. I. Hartley and A. Zisserman. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
7. A. Howard and N. Roy. The robotics data set repository (Radish), 2003. [Online], Available: http://radish.sourceforge.net.
8. W. Jeong and K. M. Lee. CV-SLAM: a new ceiling vision-based SLAM technique. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, August 2005.
9. G.-H. Kim, J.-S. Kim, and K.-S. Hong. Vision-based simultaneous localization and mapping with two cameras. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, August 2005.
10. P. D. Kovesi. MATLAB and Octave functions for computer vision and image processing. School of Computer Science and Software Engineering, The University of Western Australia. [Online], Available: http://www.csse.uwa.edu.au/~pk/ research/matlabfns/.
11. D. G. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 60(2):91-110, 2004.
12. K. Mikolajczyk and C. Schmid. A performance evaluation of local descriptors. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 27(10): 1615-1630, October 2005.
13. M. Montemerlo, S. Thrun, D. Koller, and B. Wegbreit. FastSLAM 2.0: An improved particle filtering algorithm for simultaneous localization and mapping that provably converges. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Acapulco, Mexico, 2003.
14. P. E. Rybski, S. I. Roumeliotis, M. Gini, and N. Papanikolopoulos. Appearance-based minimalistic metric SLAM. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, October 2003.
15. D. Shaw and N. Barnes. Regular polygon detection as an interest point operator for SLAM. In Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004.
16. J. Shi and C. Tomasi. Good features to track. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, 1994.
17. R. Sim, P. Elinas, M. Griffin, and J. J. Little. Vision-based SLAM using the Rao-Blackwellised particle filter. In IJCAI Workshop on Reasoning with Uncertainty in Robotics, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2005.