The role of CT and MRI in the assessment of peripheral vascular disease

Current Cardiology Reports

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 412-419

  von Ziegler, Franz ^b   Costa, Marco A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM; GADOLINIUM CHELATE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE; IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AGENT;

ALLERGIC REACTION; ANAPHYLAXIS; AORTA ANEURYSM; AORTA DISSECTION; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ENDARTERECTOMY; ENDOLEAK; FIBROMUSCULAR DYSPLASIA; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IONIZING RADIATION; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; KIDNEY DISEASE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NEPHROTOXICITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANGIOGRAPHY; AORTIC ANEURYSM, THORACIC; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CAROTID STENOSIS; FIBROMUSCULAR DYSPLASIA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; RADIATION DOSAGE; RENAL ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34548492968     PISSN: 15233782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02938369     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Yusuf S, Reddy S, Ounpuu S, Anand S: Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: part I: general considerations, the epidemiologic transition, risk factors, and impact of urbanization. Circulation 2001, 104:2746-2753.
2. Rubin GD: Techniques for performing multidetector-row computed tomographic augiography. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2001, 4:2-14.
3. Chicoskie C, Tello R: Gadolinium-enhanced MDCT angiography of the abdomen: feasibility and limitations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005, 184:1821-1828.
4. Zanzonico P, Rothenberg LN, Strauss HW: Radiation exposure of computed tomography and direct intracoronary angiography: risk has its reward. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 47:1846-1849.
5. Rubin GD, Schmidt AJ, Logan LJ, Sofilos MC: Multidetector row CT angiography of lower extremity arterial inflow and runoff: initial experience. Radiology 2001, 221:146-158.
6. Willmann JK, Mayer D, Banyai M, et al.: Evaluation of peripheral arterial bypass grafts with multi-detector row CT angiography: comparison with duplex US and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2003, 229:465-474.
7. Greess H, Lutze J, Nomayr A, et al.: Dose reduction in subsecond multislice spiral CT examination of children by online tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 2004, 14:995-999.
8. Wintersperger B, Jakobs T, Herzog P, et al.: Aorto-iliac multidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings: improved vessel enhancement and simultaneous reduction of radiation dose. Eur Radiol 2005, 15:334-341.
9. McCollough CH: Patient dose in cardiac computed tomography. Herz 2003; 28:1-6.
10. Nash K, Hafeez A, Hou S: Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis 2002, 39:930-936.
11. McCullough PA, Wolyn R, Rocher LL, et al.: Acute renal failure after coronary intervention: incidence, risk factors, and relationship to mortality. Am J Med 1997, 103:368-375.
12. McCullough PA, Adam A, Becker CR, et al.: Epidemiology and prognostic implications of contrast-induced nephropathy. Am J Cardiol 2006, 98:5K-13K.
13. Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, et al.: A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 44:1393-1399.
14. US Food and Drug Administration. Public health advisory: gadolinium-containing contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): Omniscan, OptiMARK, Magnevist, ProHance, and MuitiHance. Information for Healthcare Professionals. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/advisory/gadolinium_agents.htm. Accessed June 20, 2007.
15. Qureshi AI, Alexandrov AV, Tegeler CH, et al.: Guidelines for screening of extracranial carotid artery disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the multidisciplinary practice guidelines committee of the American Society of Neuroimaging; cosponsored by the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology. J Neuroimaging 2007, 17:19-47.
16. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Lancet 1991, 337:1235-1243.
17. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1991, 325:445-453.
18. Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, et al.: Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1998, 339:1415-1425.
19. Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K, et al.: Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003, 227:522-528.
20. Bartlett ES, Walters TD, Symons SP, Fox AJL: Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006, 27:13-19.
21. Nandalur KR, Baskurt E, Hagspiel KD, et al.: Carotid artery calcification on CT may independently predict stroke risk. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 186:547-552.
22. Jenkins RH, Mahal R, MacEneaney PM: Noninvasive imaging of carotid artery disease: critically appraised topic. Can Assoc Radiol J 2003, 54:121-123.
23. Chalela JA, Kidwell CS, Nentwich LM, et al.: Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison. Lancet 2007; 369:293-298.
24. White PM, Wardlaw JM, Easton V: Can noninvasive imaging accurately depict intracranial aneurysms? A systematic review. Radiology 2000, 217:361-370.
25. Sommer T, Fehske W, Holzknecht N, et al.: Aortic dissection: a comparative study of diagnosis with spiral CT, multiplanar transesophageal echocardiography, and MR imaging. Radiology 1996, 199:347-352.
26. Barbant SD, Eisenberg MJ, Schiller NB: The diagnostic value of imaging techniques for aortic dissection. Am Heart J 1992, 124:541-543.
27. Yucel EK, Steinberg FL, Egglin TK, et al.: Penetrating aortic ulcers: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1990, 177:779-781.
28. Sawhney R, Kerlan RK, Wall SD, et al.: Analysis of initial CT findings after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Radiology 2001, 220:157-160.
29. Engellau L, Albrechtsson U, Dahlstrom N, et al.: Measurements before endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. MR imaging with MRA vs. angiography and CT. Acta Radiol 2003, 44:177-184.
30. Gorich J, Rilinger N, Soldner J, et al.: Endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms: treatment of complications. J Endovasc Surg 1999, 6:136-146.
31. Wicky S, Fan CM, Geller SC, et al.: MR angiography of endoleak with inconclusive concomitant CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003, 181:736-738.
32. Safian RD, Textor SC: Renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 2001, 344:431-442.
33. Halpern EJ, Rutter CM, Gardiner GA, Jr. et al.: Comparison of Doppler US and CT angiography for evaluation of renal artery stenosis. Acad Radiol 1998, 5:524-532.
34. Johnson PT, Halpern EJ, Kuszyk BS, et al.: Renal artery stenosis: CT angiography - comparison of real-time volume-rendering and maximum intensity projection algorithms. Radiology 1999, 211:337-343.
35. Willmann JK, Wildermuth S, Pfammatter T, et al.: Aortoiliac and renal arteries: prospective intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 2003, 226:798-811.
36. Fraioli F, Catalano C, Bertoletti L, et al.: Multidetector-row CT angiography of renal artery stenosis in 50 consecutive patients: prospective interobserver comparison with DSA. Radiol Med (Torino) 2006, 111:459-468.
37. Raza SA, Chughtai AR, Wahba M, et al.: Multislice CT angiography in renal artery stent evaluation: prospective comparison with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2004, 27:9-15.
38. Eklof H, Ahlstrom H, Bostrom A, et al.: Renal artery stenosis evaluated with 3D-Gd-magnetic resonance angiography using transstenotic pressure gradient as the standard of reference. A multireader study. Acta Radiol 2005, 46:802-809.
39. Prince MR, Schoenberg SO, Ward JS, et al.: Hemodynamically significant atherosclerotic renal artery stanosis: MR angiographic features. Radiology 1997, 205:128-136.
40. Hagspiel KD, Leung DA, Nandalur KR et al.: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5 T after implantation of platinum stents: in vitro and in vivo comparison with conventional stent designs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005, 184:288-294.
41. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, et al.: Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med 2004, 141:674-682.
42. Pentecost MJ, Criqui MH, Dorros G, et al.: Guidelines for peripheral percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the abdominal aorta and lower extremity vessels. A statement for health professionals from a Special Writing Group of the Councils on Cardiovascular Radiology, Arteriosclerosis, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention, the American Heart Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003, 14(9 Pt 2):S495-S515.
43. Ofer A, Nitecki SS, Linn S, et al.: Multidetector CT angiography of peripheral vascular disease: a prospective comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003, 180:719-724.
44. Ouwendijk R, Kock MC, Visser K, et al.: Interobserver agreement for the interpretation of contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography and MDCT angiography in peripheral arterial disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005, 185:1261-1267.
45. Ouwendijk R, de Vries M, Pattynama PM et al.: Imaging peripheral arterial disease: a randomized controlled trial comparing contrast-enhanced MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 2005, 236:1094-1103.